Analisis Kemampuan Siswa SMA Kabupaten Sumba Barat Daya Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dalam Pembelajaran Matematika

Edi Wahyudi, Samuel Rex Making Mulyadi

Abstract


This research aims to describe the competence of Senior High School students at South West Sumba in doing the high order thinking skills test on math lesson. This research is a survey research with 274 students of eleven SMA/MA in South West Sumba as the samples of research. The instrument used in this research was high order thinking skills test which are divided into 1 analysis test, 1 evaluation test and 1 creating test. The instrument has been tested in terms of construct validation and reliability by doing the instrument testing. The percentage of students who answer correctly on higher order thinking skills at analysis aspect with the ability of problem solving which are understanding the problems, making plans and finding solutions are 85.8%, 68.2% and 65.7%. The percentage of students who answer correctly on evaluation aspect with the ability of problem solving which include understanding the problem, making plans and finding solutions are 61.3%, 13.0% and 24.5%. While the percentage of students who answer correctly on creating aspect with the ability of problem solving that include understanding the problem, making plans and finding solutions are 15.3%, 13.5% and 12%. The average score gained by the students on analysis, evaluation and creating aspect which are converted on score 0-100 are 54, 37 and 34.

 


Keywords


analys, ability, higher order thinking skills.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mendikbud. (2016). Silabus Mata Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah/Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan/Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan.

BNSP. (2006). Standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

King, FJ., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2013) Higher Order Thinking Skills. www.cala.fsu.edu. 06 Agustus 2019.

Newman, F.M., King, M.B,, & Carmichael, D.L. (2007). Authentic instruction and assessment: Common standards for rigor and relevance in teaching academic subjects. Des Moines, IA: Department of Education

Riadi, A. & Retnawato. H. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan HOTS pada kompetensi bangun ruang sisi datar. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 126-135.

https://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/hasil-un/

Bloom, B. S (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York, NY: McKay.

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of education objectives. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Krulik, S. & Rudnick, J. A. (1999). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

Yen, T. S. & Halili, S. H. (2015). Effective teaching of higher-order thinking (HOT) ineducation. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(2), 41-47.

Saido, G. M., Siraj, A., Nordin, A. B. B., & Al Amedy, O. S. (2015). Higher order thinking skills among secondary school students in science learning. The Malaysian Online Journal of Education Science, 3(3), 13-20.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2015). Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Menengah, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Longman.

Butkowski, J., Corrigan, C., Nemeth, T., & Spencer, L. (1994). Improving student higher-order thinking skills in mathematics. Theses. Mathematics Education Research, Saint Xavier University-IRI, Fied-Based Master’s Program

Polya, G. (1973). How to Solve It. New Jerse: Princeton University Press

Sumarmo, U, Dedy, E dan Rahmat (1994). Suatu Alternatif Pengajaran untuk Meningkatkan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika pada Guru dan Siswa SMA. Laporan Hasil Penelitian FPMIPA IKIP Bandung.

Gagne, R.M. (1992). The Condition of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: Rinehart and Winston.

Rothstein & Pamela. (1990). Educational Psychology. New York: Mc. Graw Hill, Inc.

Haolader, F. A., Ali, R., & Foysol, K. (2015). The taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: Current practices at polytechnics in Bangladesh and its effects in developing students' competences. Research in vocational and traning. 2 (2). 99-118, DOI: 10.13152/IJRVET.2.2.9.

Geary, D. C., & Fuchs, L. S., (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities. American Psychological Association. 46(6), 1731-1746. DOI: 10.1037/a0020662.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jime.v6i2.1421

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Edi Wahyudi, Samuel Rex Making Mulyadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
JIME: Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (p-issn: 2442-9511;e-issn: 2656-5862) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.