KEEFEKTIFAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GUIDED INQUIRY DAN PBL DALAM PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DAN SIKAP ILMIAH

Anisah Anisah

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran Guided Inquiry dan PBL dalam pendekatan saintifik ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika dan sikap ilmiah siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Penelitian ini merupakan  penelitian eksperimen semu dengan pretest-posttest non-ekuivalen group design. Populasi penelitian ini mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP N 2 Godean yang terdiri dari empat kelas, yang dua kelasnya ditentukan secara acak sebagai sampel. Kelas VIII-B diberi perlakuan dengan model pembelajaran Guided Inquiry dalam pendekatan saintifik, sedangkan kelas VIII-A diberi perlakuan dengan model pembelajaran PBL dalam pendekatan saintifik. Instrumen penelitian terdiri dari soal tes prestasi belajar matematika dan angket sikap ilmiah dalam pembelajaran matematika. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran Guided Inquiry dan PBL dalam pendekatan saintifik pada masing-masing variabel, digunakan uji one sampel t-test. Selanjutnya untuk membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran Guided Inquiry dan PBL dalam pendekatan saintifik di analisis secara multivariat menggunakan uji  T2 Hotelling’s pada taraf signifikan 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran  Guided Inquiry dan PBL dalam pendekatan saintifik efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika dan sikap ilmiah dalam pembelajaran matematika dan model pembelajaran Guided Inquiry dalam pendekatan saintifik tidak lebih efektif daripada model pembelajaran PBL dalam pendekatan saintifik ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika dan sikap ilmiah siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika

References


Abidin, Y. (2014). Desain system pembelajaran dalam konteks kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (2010). Demystify math, science, and technology: creativity, innovation, and problem solving. New York : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Akinoglu, O., & Tandogan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning science education on students’academic achievement, attitude, and conceptlearning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Teknologi Education, 3, 71-81.

Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for students learning: Becoming a accamplisher teacher. New York: Routledge.

Bilgin, I. (2009). The effect of guided inquiry instruction incoparation a cooperative learning approach on university students’ achievement of acid and based concept and attitude toward guided inquiryinstruction. Scientific Research and Essay. 4, 1039-1046.

BSNP. (2012). Laporan hasil sekolah ujian nasional SMP/MTS tahun pelajaran 2011/2012.

BSNP. (2013). Laporan hasil sekolah ujian nasional SMP/MTS tahun pelajaran 2012/2013.

Campbell, A., & Norton, L. ( 2007). Learning, teaching and assessing in higher education: developing reflective practice. Southernhay East: Learning maters.

Carin, A. A., & Sund, R.B. (1999). Teaching science through discovery (6th ed). London : Meril Publishing Company.

Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.

Fatade. A.O, et al. (2013). Fffect of problem-based learning on senior secondary school students’achievements in further mathematics. Journal of Education. 3, 27-43.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21: kunci sukses implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Huberty, C. J., & Olejnik S. (2006).Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Jhonson, D. W., & Jhonson, R. T. (2002). Meaningfull assessment: a manageable and cooperative process. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (6th ed.). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2007). Guided Inquiry. Libraries Unlimitid.

Kyriacou, C. (2009). Effective teaching in schools: theory and practice. London: Nelson Thornes.

Lee, J., & Lee, M. (2004). Scientific Attitudes And Science Achievement. Journal Internasional of Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Hwa College of Medical Technology, 2, 483-490.

Llewellyn, Douglas (2011). Teaching high school science through inquiry. Thausand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Marchi, S. (2005). Computional and mathematical modeling in the social science.

Matthew, B.M., & Kenneth.I.O. (2013). A study on the effect of guided inquiry teacing method on students achievement in logic. The Internasional Research Journal “Internasional Research”. 1, 134-140.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The NCTM,Inc.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

OECD.(2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know Can Do- Student Performance In Reading Mathematics And Science (Volume 1), Golan, Heights:OECD.

OECD.(2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know Can Do- Student Performance In Reading Mathematics And Science (Volume 1), Golan, Heights:OECD.

Pitafi, A.I., & Muhammad, F. (2012). Measurement of scientific attitude of secondary school students in Pakistan. Internasional Journal.2, 1-15.

Powner, L. C., (2006). Teaching the scientific method in the active learning classroom. Proquest Social Science Journals. 3, 521-524.

Pritchard, A., & Woolard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: constructivism and social learning. New York : Routledge.

Rahmayanti, F., Ramdani, A., Japa, L., (2014). Pengaruh penerapan model inkuiri terbimbing (guided inquiry) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas XI peminatan matematika dan ilmu-ilmu alam SMAN 2 Gerung ahun ajaran 2014/2015. Journal Pendidikan, 1-14.

Rathus, S. A. (2014). Childhood adolescence: voyages in development. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Sawin, E. I. (2005). The scientific method and other bases for evaluation procedure. Proquest Scientific Journal. 2, 386-404. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sekar, P., & Mani, S. (2013). Science attitude of higher secondary students. Indian Journal of Research., 11, 23-38.

Skemp, R. R. (1971). The psychology of learning mathematics. London: Victoria.

Sullivan, P., & Lilburn Pat (2002).Good question for math teaching :Why ask them and what to ask, K-6. Los Angles: Oxford University Press.

Tan, O. (2009). Problem based learning and creativity. New Tech Park: Cengage Learning.

Tan, O. (2004). Enhancing thinking through problem-based learning aproaches. New Tech Park: Cengage Learning.

Torp, L., & Sage S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: problem –based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria: ASCD.

Trefil, J., & Hazen, R. M., (2010). The sciences an integrated approach ( 6th ed). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Uygun, N., & Tertemiz N.I. (2014). Effect of problem based learning on students attitudes, achievement and retention of learning in math course. Journal of Education and Science. 39, 75-90.

Villagonzalo, E. C. (2014). Process oriented guided inquiry learning: an effective approach in enhancing students’academic performance. DLSU Research Congress. 7, 1-3.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36312/jime.v2i1.288

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 32 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) - 47 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
JIME: Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (p-issn: 2442-9511;e-issn: 2656-5862) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.