Accountability and Transparency in Regional Governance: A Study of Good Governance Implementation

Francisco Borges Dos Santos

Abstract


This study aims to analyze digital transformation strategies in public administration as an effort to improve the quality of e-government-based public services. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design supported by a literature review. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation at government agencies that have implemented digital-based services. Data analysis was conducted interactively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion using triangulation techniques to ensure data validity. The results show that digital transformation has a positive impact on improving the quality of public services, particularly in aspects of reliability, responsiveness, transparency, and ease of access to services. The implementation of e-government systems can accelerate administrative processes, reduce complicated bureaucratic procedures, and increase service accountability. However, challenges faced include limited technological infrastructure, the digital literacy gap among the public, and resistance from some officials to change. The success of digital transformation is greatly influenced by visionary leadership, adaptive regulatory support, and increased human resource competency. Therefore, digital transformation strategies must be implemented in an integrated and sustainable manner to achieve public services that are effective, inclusive, and responsive to community needs.

Keywords


Digital Transformation; Public Administration; E-Government; Quality of Public Services Bureaucratic Reform.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.

Diamond, L. (2004). What is good governance? Hoover Digest, 3, 1–6.

Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671.

Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.

Heald, D. (2006). Transparency as an instrumental value. Public Administration, 84(1), 25–42.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi Offset.

Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.

O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112–126.

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.

Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing accountability. The Self-Restraining State, 13–28.

Shah, A. (2007). Local governance in developing countries. World Bank.

Konstitusi RDTL.

UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.

World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. World Bank.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v8i1.10463

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Francisco Borges Dos Santos

View My Stats

Lisensi Creative Commons
JIHAD : Ilmu Administrasi dan Hukum 2745-9489 (Print), 2746-3842 (Elektronik) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.

Alamat: Jl. Lingkar Selatan, Perum Elit kota Mataram Asri Blok O. No. 35, Jempong Baru, Sekarbela, Kota Mataram NTB. Indonesia