The Effectiveness of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2014 in Marriage Services at the KUA of Ampenan District: A Socio-Legal Study in Banjar Village
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of Government Regulation Number 48 of 2014 concerning Tariffs on Types of Non-Tax State Revenue Applicable to the Ministry of Religious Affairs, focusing on marriage service practices in Banjar Village, Ampenan District, Mataram City. The regulation stipulates a zero-rupiah tariff for marriages conducted at the Office of Religious Affairs and a Rp600,000 tariff for marriages conducted outside the office. This study aims to analyze the regulation of non-tax state revenue in marriage services, evaluate its implementation, and examine community responses to the policy. This research employed a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through observation, interviews with officials of the Office of Religious Affairs, community leaders, neighborhood heads, and residents, as well as documentation of marriage records and relevant regulations. The findings show that Government Regulation Number 48 of 2014 is administratively effective because it has been implemented according to formal procedures, payments are made through official mechanisms, and no major problems related to gratuities were found. However, its social effectiveness remains limited. The data indicate that most residents of Banjar Village still prefer to conduct marriages outside the Office of Religious Affairs due to Sasak customary traditions, the need for family witnessing, limited office space and service time, and the desire to hold marriage ceremonies as communal events. Some residents consider the Rp600,000 tariff burdensome, especially when combined with customary expenses. This study confirms that legal effectiveness must be assessed through the relationship between state regulation, public service delivery, economic conditions, and local culture.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar, K. (n.d.). PP 48 Tahun 2014 dan PMA 24 2014, menuju KUA berintegritas. Bimas Islam Kementerian Agama RI. Retrieved October 16, 2020, from https://bimasislam.kemenag.go.id/
Azizi, J., & Muzawir, M. (2023). Reformasi hukum perkawinan: Pencatatan perkawinan di berbagai negara Muslim. Jurnal Darussalam Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab, 3(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.59259/jd.v3i1.51
Aulya, A., & Ahmad, I. (2023). Koeksistensi hukum perkawinan Islam di Indonesia: Interpretasi Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap pernikahan beda agama di Indonesia. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam, 8(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.30863/ajmpi.v8i1.4149
Billah, M. (2024). The maslahah of state policy in responding to unregistered marriage: Inclusion of unregistered marriage on the family card. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam, 6(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v6i2.31138
Blandy, S. (2016). Socio-legal approaches to property law research. In Researching property law (pp. 24–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-48618-9_3
Curtin, M., & Fossey, E. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
Dangal, M. R., & Joshi, R. (2020). Hermeneutic phenomenology: Essence in educational research. Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 4(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0401.03025d
Fatma, Y. (2019). Batasan usia perkawinan dalam hukum keluarga Islam: Perbandingan antar negara Muslim: Turki, Pakistan, Maroko dan Indonesia. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 18(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v18i2.1670
Flynn, S. V., & Korcuska, J. S. (2018). Credible phenomenological research: A mixed-methods study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 57(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12092
Hadikusuma, H. (2003). Hukum perkawinan Indonesia menurut perundangan, hukum adat dan hukum agama. Mandar Maju.
Ifrohati, I., & Sintri. (2023). Relevansi pencatatan nikah sirri dalam kartu keluarga menurut hak asasi manusia dan maqashid syariah. JSLS, 1(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v1i1.45
Keenoy, J. E., Paldi, R., Perry, Y., Screven, M., & Eeden-Moorefield, B. van. (2024). A guide to conducting intersectional phenomenological research in family science. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(3), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12580
Khairunnisa, R., & Fawzi, R. (2022). Analisis hukum Islam dan implementasi Permenag Nomor 20 Tahun 2019 tentang pencatatan pernikahan. Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.vi.880
Koentjaraningrat. (n.d.). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Lenberg, P., Feldt, R., Gren, L., Tengberg, L. G. W., Tidefors, I., & Graziotin, D. (2023). Qualitative software engineering research: Reflections and guidelines. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2607
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mistiar, W., Afriani, A’zizah, Saleh, A., Suhaidi, Putra, M. E., & Hasyim, S. (2023). Penyuluhan hukum: Kajian yuridis tentang rancangan Qanun Nikah Siri Provinsi Aceh, pembenahan, dan dampak pada masyarakat di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Aceh Simeulue. Kawanad: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.56347/kjpkm.v2i2.172
Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, D. (2006). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mustika, D., & Marlina, S. (2019). Integrated marriage itsbat: Analyzing the polemics behind its implementation. Mazahib, 44–75. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v18i1.1344
Nastangin. (2022). Tinjauan filosofis Pasal 2 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Perkawinan No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang pencatatan perkawinan. Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 2(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v2i1.89
Noor, J. (2006). Metodologi penelitian. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noor, J. (2012). Metodologi penelitian: Skripsi, tesis, disertasi, dan karya ilmiah (Edisi pertama). Kencana.
O’Neill, C., & Kenny, N. (2023). “I saw things through a different lens…”: An interpretative phenomenological study of the experiences of autistic teachers in the Irish education system. Education Sciences, 13(7), 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070670
Roqib, M. (2016). Penolakan ithbat nikah siri bagi suami yang sudah beristri. Al-Hukama, 6(2), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2016.6.2.422-447
Setiawan, Y. (2022). Analisa pencatatan nikah (kawin belum tercatat) pada KK dalam perspektif Disdukcapil Purwakarta. Muttaqien: Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Islamic Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.52593/mtq.03.2.02
Soekanto, S. (1983). Penegakan hukum. Bina Cipta.
Soemiyati. (1982). Hukum perkawinan Islam dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan: Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Liberty.
Mertokusumo S. (1995). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. Liberty.
Usman, M. (1983). Kaidah-kaidah ushuliah dan fiqiyah: Pedoman dasar dalam istinbath hukum Islam. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Widiyanto, H. (2021). Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Purworejo Nomor 0028/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Pwr. dalam memutuskan perkara asal-usul anak di luar pernikahan. An-Nawa: Jurnal Studi Islam, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37758/annawa.v3i1.155
Yeh, C. J., & Inman, A. G. (2007). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation in counseling psychology: Strategies for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(3), 369–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006292596
Zairul, M. (2025). Mastering thematic analysis: A step-by-step guide for beginners with tips for systematic analysis using ATLAS.ti 25. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251384401
Zuhdi, M. H. (2016). Qawa’id fiqiyyah. Elhikam Press Lombok.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Dokumen
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2004 tentang Tarif atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak yang Berlaku pada Departemen Agama.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 47 Tahun 2004 tentang Tarif atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak yang Berlaku pada Departemen Agama.
Peraturan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengelolaan Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak atas Biaya Nikah dan Rujuk di Luar Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan.
KUA Ampenan. (2018–2020). Buku umum register nikah KUA Ampenan. KUA Kecamatan Ampenan.
KUA Ampenan. (2020–2021). Buku pencatatan nikah. KUA Kecamatan Ampenan.
Kelurahan Banjar. (2019). Monografi Kelurahan Banjar. Kelurahan Banjar, Kecamatan Ampenan, Kota Mataram.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v8i2.10610
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Siti Jahroh, Siti Jahroh
JIHAD : Ilmu Administrasi dan Hukum 2745-9489 (Print), 2746-3842 (Elektronik) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.
Alamat: Jl. Lingkar Selatan, Perum Elit kota Mataram Asri Blok O. No. 35, Jempong Baru, Sekarbela, Kota Mataram NTB. Indonesia