Comparison of Corruption Eradication Institutions in Various Countries (Indonesia, Hong Kong, Japan, Australia, New Zealand)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i2.6968Keywords:
Comparative Study Corruption Anti Corruption Independent InstitutionAbstract
This study discusses the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) since 2019 there has been a significant change, because the second amendment to the KPK Law has been ratified through Law Number 19 of 2019, Indonesia's ranking index is at 115, amputated authority and declining performance. The study conducted a comparative approach between the Indonesian KPK and the corruption eradication institutions of Hong Kong, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. It was found that Asian and Australian countries have less authority, but are ranked high (3 to 14) in eradicating corruption compared to Indonesia which is ranked 115. The results of the study show that there has been a change in the position of the KPK institution in terms of state administration which is no longer an Auxiliary body but a state organ, full authority but requires permission from the supervisory board, accountability and full control by the government (executive).References
Abdoel Djamali,Pengantar Hukum Indonesia,Edisi Revisi, Jakarta, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2006
Barda Nawawi Arief, perbandingan hukum pidana, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2014
Dinsha Arjuna, Corruption and the paradox of transparency, stanford law school- rule of law program, 2018.
Dobel, J. (1978). The corruption of a state. American Political Science Review, 72(3), 958-973.
Elgar Encynclopedia of Comparative Law, 2006
https://fahum.umsu.ac.id/kasus-terbesar-yang-ditangani-oleh-kpk-di-indonesia/ , diakses 20 mei 2024
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7204505/polisi-jelaskan-progres-terkini-kasus-dugaan-firli-bahuri-peras-syl, diakses 20 mei 2024
https://sfo.govt.nz/about-us/who-we-are/legislation/, diakses 25 mei 2024
https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/en/document/opinionpapers/20160715.html, diakses tanggal 25 mei 2024
I Made Pasek Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2016
Johny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2006
Mahmuddin Muslim, Jalan Panjang Menuju KPTPK, Jakarta, Gerakan Rakyat Anti Korupsi (GeRAK) Indonesia, 2004
Moh. Yamin, Laporan Hasil Pendidikan : Command Cource 1989 Independent Commision Againts Corruption, Jakarta, 1989
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Pustaka Fajar, Yogyakarta, 2010
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2005
Rahmiati, Trias Saputra, Perbandingan Lembaga Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia, Singapura Dan Hongkong, Jurnal Jupisi, 2019
Sarmadan pohan, Perbandingan Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia Dan Beberapa Negara, jurnal justitia vol.1, 2018
The serious Fraud Office Act 1990, New Zealand, 2024
Transparency International, pelemahan jadi nyata, evaluasi komisi pemberantasan korupsi 2019-2023
Undang-undang nomor 19 tahun 2019 tentang perubahan kedua Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
Undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang nomor 31 tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-undang nomor 30 tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
www.antibriberyjapan.org/about, diakses tanggal 25 mei 2024
www.icac.nsw.gov.au./History. Diakses 25 mei 2024
www.icac.org.hk/ICAC history, diakses tanggal 25 mei 2024
www.nsw.gov.au/about. Diakses 25 mei 2024
www.transparency.org, corruption perceptions index, 2023.
