Legal Reconstruction of Empirical Juridical Analysis of Unilated Determination of Defense  (Study of Pontianak District Court Decision Number 51/Pdt.G/2021/PN Ptk)

Efriza Erby; Rina Arum Prastyanti; R. Taufiq Nur Muftiyanto

doi:10.58258/jihad.v6i3.7254

Legal Reconstruction of Empirical Juridical Analysis of Unilated Determination of Defense (Study of Pontianak District Court Decision Number 51/Pdt.G/2021/PN Ptk)

Efriza Erby, Rina Arum Prastyanti, R. Taufiq Nur Muftiyanto

Abstract

Decision case number 51/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Ptk contains a legal problem, namely the unilateral determination of default and the legal consequences (the application for the sale of collateral was also carried out unilaterally). This research basically aims to find out the legality of unilateral determination of default in positive law in Indonesia and the legal construction of Pontianak State Decision No. 51/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Ptk in terms of the theory of legal certainty. This research has a normative juridical character, with a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials were obtained from primary legal sources (legislation and decisions) as well as secondary legal materials, namely library sources such as books and journals. The results of this research: The legality of unilateral determination of default in positive law in Indonesia refers to the Supreme Court (MA) Jurisprudence No. 186 K/Sip/1959 and based on the jurisprudence of the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Decision No. 852 /K/Sip/1972, in Indonesian law, it is not legal/legitimate/legitimate to carry out unilateral acts of default without a prior summons. The legal construction of the Pontianak District Decision No. 51/pdt.g/2021/pn PTK is viewed from the theory of legal certainty, namely that the judge must grant petitum number 3 "stating that the Defendant's decision stating that the Plaintiff is a bad debt debtor is an unlawful act and cancels the entire series of consequences of the decision. Unilateral default, namely making a Sales Request unilaterally. Because in the theory of legal certainty, compliance or implementation of legal sources (jurisprudence) is a concrete form of legal certainty.

Keywords

OSS RBA; OSS; PT; Business Licensing.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Yahman, Karakteristik Wanprestasi Dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Yang Lahir Dari Hubungan Kontraktual. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

S. Paujiah, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Lelang Objek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Pada Perbankan Syariah (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Muamalat Indonesia),” 2021.

Z. Siregar, “Akibat Hukum Pelaksanaan Lelang Tanpa Pemberitahuan Pihak Bank Terhadap Debitur (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 607/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Mdn),” 2016.

P. Oktavina, “Implikasi Yuridis Pelaksanaan Lelang Terhadap Barang Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Tanpa Pemberitahuan Kepada Debitur Dan Tanpa Pengumuman Lelang,” 2021.

B. Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Yahman, Karakteristik Wanprestasi dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan, Cet.3. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

K. Paendong and H. Taunaumang, “Kajian Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perikatan Dan Perjanjian Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata,” Lex Priv., Vol. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2022.

A. Miru, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Y. Harahap, Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian, Cetakan Ke. Bandung: ALUMNI, 1986.

W. R. Prodjodikoro, Azas-Azas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000.

J. Satrio, Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.

S. HS, Hukum Perjanjian, Teori dan Praktik Penyusunan Perjanjian, Cet. 5. Jakarta Pusat: Sinar Gafika, 2008.

K. Afendy, “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Hakim yang Mengabulkan Gugatan Wanprestasi Tanpa Didahului Surat Somasi,” Rechtsregel J. Ilmu Huk., vol. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 148–160, 2023.

R. T. Runtunuwu, O. A. Pangkerego, and R. V. Karamoy, “Kajian Terhadap Tanggung Gugat Karena Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata,” Lex Priv., vol. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 240–248, 2022.

M. Y. Harahap, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia, 1989.

J. Efendi, Kamus Istilah Hukum Populer. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

B. Manan and K. Magnar, Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara. Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2017.

P. M. Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.

B. Manan, Hukum Positif Indonesia, Satu Kajian Teoritik. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2004.

O. V. Agustine, “Keberlakuan Yurisprudensi pada Kewenangan Pengujian Undang-Undang dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 643–665, 2018.

S. Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogayakarta, 2019.

Z. Nur, “Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum (Refleksi Kajian Filsafat Hukum Dalam Pemikiran Hukum Imam Syâtibî),” MISYKAT AL-ANWAR J. Kaji. Islam DAN Masy., vol. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 248–271, 2023.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i3.7254

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.