Dynamics of Business Competition in the Business Sector Online Transportation: Case Study of Grab Indonesia's Discriminatory Allegations Against Independent Drivers According to the Business Competition Supervisory Commission's Perspective

Authors

  • Firyal Nur Salsabilasyah Fakultas Hukum Program Studi Ilmu Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Viona Ardhanareswari Fakultas Hukum Program Studi Ilmu Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Saffira Aulia Fakultas Hukum Program Studi Ilmu Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Dwi Desy Yayi Tarina Fakultas Hukum Program Studi Ilmu Hukum UPN “Veteran” Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i4.7631

Keywords:

Online Ojek, Business Competition, Discrimination.

Abstract

This research discusses the dynamics of business competition in the online transportation sector, focusing on a case study of allegations of discrimination by Grab Indonesia against independent drivers. Ride-hailing has become an integral part of modern society, leveraging technological developments to provide efficient and transparent transportation services. However, behind the convenience offered, the issue of unfair business competition arises, such as what happened to Grab Indonesia. This research explores how the cooperation between Grab Indonesia and PT TPI, which provides rental vehicles for drivers, has led to allegations of discrimination against independent drivers. Using a normative juridical research method, this study analyzes the mechanism for resolving violations of law related to discrimination by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). The results show that the discriminatory actions taken by Grab Indonesia have negatively impacted independent drivers and triggered regulatory intervention by KPPU.

References

Hikam, H. a. A. (2019, October 9). Terseret Perkara Grab di KPPU, Siapa Sih PT TPI? Detikfinance. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-4739134/terseret-perkara-grab-di-kppu-siapa-sih-pt-tpi

CNN Indonesia. (2020, Juli 3). Kronologi Kasus Grab hingga Denda Rp30 M oleh KPPU. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20200703074627-92-520318/kronologi-kasus-grab-hingga-denda-rp30-m-oleh-kppu

Rewangrencang. (n.d.). Kasus Persaingan Usaha Grab. Rewangrencang. https://rewangrencang.com/kasus-persaingan-usaha-grab/

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). (2019). Salinan Putusan 13-KPPU-I-2019. https://putusan.kppu.go.id/simper/_lib/file/doc/Salinan%20Putusan%2013-KPPU-I-2019.pdf

Tempo. (2020, Januari 21). Awal Mula KPPU Seret Grab ke Meja Hijau: Diskriminasi Order Taksi. Tempo.co. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1254583/awal-mula-kppu-seret-grab-ke-meja-hijau-diskriminasi-order-taksi

CNBC Indonesia. (2020, Juli 3). Runutan Kasus Grab TPI di KPPU. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20200703181036-37-170110/runutan-kasus-grab-tpi-di-kppu

Gold-Kapten PT. TPI dan Grab Indonesia Tertipu dan Terancam. (n.d.). Konfederasi Serikat Buruh Seluruh Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.ksbsi.org/home/read/1342/Gold-Kapten-PT.-TPI-dan-Grab-Indonesia-Tertipu-dan-Terancam

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01