An Analysis of EFL Students’ Perceptions of Learning Difficulties in Digital Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58258/qr2nvh75Abstract
The rapid integration of digital learning in higher education has transformed the landscape of language learning, presenting unique challenges for students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). This study aims to analyze the perceptions of eighth-semester EFL students regarding the learning difficulties they face in a digital environment while taking English-based courses. Using a descriptive qualitative design, this study employed a dichotomous-scale screening questionnaire distributed to 12 respondents, followed by semi-structured interviews with six key informants selected through purposive sampling. The findings of the quantitative analysis indicate that participants experienced difficulties in communicating with their lecturers, with 91.7% experiencing problems with an inconsistent internet connection, and 91.7% reporting a decline in concentration and motivation. From a qualitative perspective, thematic analysis categorised these challenges into five main categories: technological infrastructure failures; boredom with the largely one-way nature of the learning process in the form of online lectures; mental fatigue due to excessive digital workload and anxiety; social isolation resulting from the lack of a tangible academic community; and language barriers arising from limited opportunities to speak and a fear of making mistakes. When evaluated through Krashen’s Affective Filter Theory, Moore’s Transactional Distance, and Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, the findings of this study demonstrate how physical separation and rigid online systems contribute to a significant increase in the affective filter and transactional distance, which in turn hinders the effective development of English language skills. This study provides actionable recommendations for educational institutions and teachers on creating engaging, supportive and flexible digital language learning environments.References
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The
challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(14), 863–875.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Agung, A. S., Surtikanti, M. W., & Quinones, C. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions of online
learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the English education study
program. Journal of Innovative Studies in Education and Language, 4(2), 225–235.
Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online
teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’
perspective.
Sustainability,
12(24),
Article
10367.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. SAGE Publications.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based
environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher
Education, 2(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson Longman.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon
Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods
sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Moore, M. G. (2013). Handbook of distance education. Routledge.
Putri, A., & Sari, R. (2022). Evaluating the advantages of digital resources in EFL
classrooms. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 15(1), 10–22.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and
applied linguistics. Longman.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International
Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review.
Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(1), 157–190.
https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A
tool on whose terms?. UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Radha Sulistia Gultom, Taufik Suadiyatno, Edi Firman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



