An Analysis of EFL Students’ Perceptions of Learning Difficulties in Digital Learning

Authors

  • Radha Sulistia Gultom UNDIKMA
  • Taufik Suadiyatno English Education Department, Mandalika University of Education, Indonesia
  • Edi Firman English Education Department, Mandalika University of Education, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/qr2nvh75

Abstract

The rapid integration of digital learning in higher education has transformed the landscape of language learning, presenting unique challenges for students of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). This study aims to analyze the perceptions of eighth-semester EFL students regarding the learning difficulties they face in a digital environment while taking English-based courses. Using a descriptive qualitative design, this study employed a dichotomous-scale screening questionnaire distributed to 12 respondents, followed by semi-structured interviews with six key informants selected through purposive sampling. The findings of the quantitative analysis indicate that participants experienced difficulties in communicating with their lecturers, with 91.7% experiencing problems with an inconsistent internet connection, and 91.7% reporting a decline in concentration and motivation. From a qualitative perspective, thematic analysis categorised these challenges into five main categories: technological infrastructure failures; boredom with the largely one-way nature of the learning process in the form of online lectures; mental fatigue due to excessive digital workload and anxiety; social isolation resulting from the lack of a tangible academic community; and language barriers arising from limited opportunities to speak and a fear of making mistakes. When evaluated through Krashen’s Affective Filter Theory, Moore’s Transactional Distance, and Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, the findings of this study demonstrate how physical separation and rigid online systems contribute to a significant increase in the affective filter and transactional distance, which in turn hinders the effective development of English language skills. This study provides actionable recommendations for educational institutions and teachers on creating engaging, supportive and flexible digital language learning environments.
Abstract Views 0PDF Downloads 0

Author Biographies

  • Taufik Suadiyatno, English Education Department, Mandalika University of Education, Indonesia
    -
  • Edi Firman, English Education Department, Mandalika University of Education, Indonesia
    -

References

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The

challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(14), 863–875.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Agung, A. S., Surtikanti, M. W., & Quinones, C. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions of online

learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the English education study

program. Journal of Innovative Studies in Education and Language, 4(2), 225–235.

Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online

teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’

perspective.

Sustainability,

12(24),

Article

10367.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

approaches. SAGE Publications.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based

environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher

Education, 2(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson Longman.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon

Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods

sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Moore, M. G. (2013). Handbook of distance education. Routledge.

Putri, A., & Sari, R. (2022). Evaluating the advantages of digital resources in EFL

classrooms. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 15(1), 10–22.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and

applied linguistics. Longman.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior. Pearson.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International

Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review.

Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(1), 157–190.

https://doi.org/10.28945/3502

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A

tool on whose terms?. UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological

processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04

How to Cite

An Analysis of EFL Students’ Perceptions of Learning Difficulties in Digital Learning. (2026). JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 10(3), 2162-2168. https://doi.org/10.58258/qr2nvh75