Media Monitoring Analysis of Moell Skincare's Clarification on Child Endorsement Issues in Live Streaming Marapthon During 29 March- 8April 2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58258/4zc79g09Abstract
This study examines media monitoring of Moell Skincare's clarification regarding the issue of child endorsement in Live Streaming Marapthon during March 29-April 8, 2026. The controversy emerged following the involvement of Andrew Raxy Neil, the son of public figure Erika Carlina, whose collaboration with Moell Skincare became associated with the program and generated extensive discussions on social media. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of public conversations following the brand's clarification. A qualitative descriptive approach using netnography was employed. Data were collected through non-participant observation using the Brand24 social media monitoring platform. The analysis focused on conversation volume, issue reach, public sentiment, dominant platforms, influential actors, and discussion themes. The findings recorded 256 mentions, with a social media reach of 12 million and a non-social media reach of 1 million. Positive sentiment dominated the conversations (65%), while negative sentiment accounted for 35%. TikTok and X emerged as the primary platforms, contributing 46.7% and 43.8% of total conversations, respectively, while online news media accounted for 9.5%. The dominant themes included child involvement in digital activities, the collaboration between Moell Skincare and Andrew Raxy Neil, the brand's clarification, and public responses to the controversy. The findings demonstrate that public conversations surrounding Moell Skincare's clarification were shaped by various actors, platforms, sentiments, and themes within digital environments. Media monitoring provides valuable insights into how organizational issues and brand clarifications develop across social media platforms.References
Benthaus, J., Risius, M., & Beck, R. (2016). Social media management strategies for organizational impression management and their effect on public perception. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(2), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.12.001
Boczkowski, P. J., & Mitchelstein, E. (2021). The digital environment: How we live, learn, work, and play now. MIT Press.
Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2016). Qualitative research in digital environments: A research toolkit. Routledge.
Fearn-Banks, K., & Kawamoto, K. (2024). Crisis communications: A casebook approach (6th ed.). Routledge.
Fenton, A., & Parry, K. D. (2022). Netnography: An approach to ethnography in the digital age. In L. Sloan, A. Quan-Haase, & S. H. S. Y. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods.
Kim, J. H., Sabherwal, R., Bock, G. W., & Kim, H. M. (2021). Understanding social media monitoring and online rumors. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61(6), 507-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2020.1762260
Lee, E. J., & Tandoc, E. C., Jr. (2017). When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12123
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Paul, M. J., & Dredze, M. (2017). Social monitoring for public health. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019). The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Climate change, 10(2), 569. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.569
Perakakis, E., Mastorakis, G., & Kopanakis, I. (2019). Social media monitoring: An innovative intelligent approach. Designs, 3(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs3020024
Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539
Rodríguez-Ibánez, M., Casánez-Ventura, A., Castejón-Mateos, F., & Cuenca-Jiménez, P. M. (2023). A review on sentiment analysis from social media platforms. Expert Systems with Applications, 223, 119862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119862
Srikandi, M. B., Suparna, P., & Haes, P. E. (2023). Audiens sebagai gatekeeper pada media sosial. Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik dan Komunikasi Bisnis, 7(2), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.24853/pk.7.2.179-192
Zhang, B., & Vos, M. (2014). Social media monitoring: Aims, methods, and challenges for international companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 19(4), 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2013-0044
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zulfanida Nurul Sadiyyah, Dewi Christina Marbun, Nisa Lathifah, Shinta Hartini Putri, Aulia Agistiyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
