Development of Model School Trust to Increase the Competitiveness of Private Schools in the Era of Declining Student Demographics: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58258/m82b9058Abstract
The declining number of school-age children due to demographic changes has intensified competition among private schools, making public trust an increasingly important strategic resource for maintaining institutional sustainability and competitiveness. Despite the growing body of research on school trust, previous studies have primarily examined its relationship with school effectiveness, leadership, and organizational climate, while limited attention has been given to its role in enhancing the competitiveness of private schools in the context of demographic decline. Therefore, this study aims to systematically map the development of research on school trust, identify dominant research themes and methodological trends, synthesize key findings, and reveal research gaps that can inform future studies. This research employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature was systematically retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, and Google Scholar, resulting in 34 peer-reviewed articles that met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. The findings reveal five major themes influencing school trust: school leadership, school governance and organizational culture, parent engagement, school reputation, and demographic change and school sustainability. The review further indicates that school trust functions as a strategic organizational asset that strengthens institutional credibility, enhances parental loyalty, improves school reputation, and ultimately increases the competitive advantage of private schools. This study contributes to the literature by proposing a conceptual model that integrates organizational antecedents of school trust with competitive advantage and school sustainability, providing a theoretical foundation for future empirical research and practical guidance for educational leaders in responding to demographic challenges.References
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
Family engagement, inequality, and student learning: A systematic literature review across socioeconomic, cultural, and marginalized contexts. (2026). Learning in Context.
Family involvement in early childhood education: A systematic review of its measurement. (2025). Early Childhood Education Journal.
Fernández-Hawrylak, M., & González-García, J. (2026). Educational distrust and institutional legitimacy: A systematic review of the social distrust framework. World, 7(5).
Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can't improve without it. Teachers College Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9(3), 184–208.
Javornik, Š., & Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, E. (2023). Factors contributing to school effectiveness: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(10), 2095–2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100148 (MDPI)
Khonsa, N., Rugaiyah, R., Rahmawati, D., & Huda, S. A. (2026). Trends and implementation of school branding strategies to increase public trust: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(6), 715–731.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, Keele University.
Li, Y., & Rahman, M. N. A. (2025). Parental involvement in digital learning during elementary school education: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Education, 60(3).
Mardiningrum, W., Juharyanto, J., & Ubaidillah, A. (2026). Analysis of parents' level of trust in school financial transparency. Jurnal Manajemen dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 9(2), 175–184.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
Mudzana, T., & Mthembu, M. (2022). School accountability and its relationship with learning outcomes: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100358 (ScienceDirect)
Muijs, D. (2024). Quality in school trusts: A comparative study in four countries. Education Sciences, 14(7), 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070752 (Queen's University Belfast)
Niedlich, S., Kallfaß, A., Pohle, S., & Bormann, I. (2021). A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review. Review of Education, 9(1), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3239 (Bera Journals)
Niedlich, S., Kummer, B., Bauer, M., Rieckmann, M., & Bormann, I. (2021). A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review. Review of Education, 9(1), e3239. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3239 (DOI)
Oduro, D., Agud-Morell, I., Bertran-Tarrés, M., et al. (2026). A scoping review on community and parent involvement in quality education in rural primary schools. SN Social Sciences.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Peng, Y., Alias, B. S., Wan, X., & Mansor, A. N. (2026). The impact of parental involvement on sustainable school in improving educational quality: A systematic review. Discover Sustainability, 7, 608.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024. UNESCO.
United Nations. (2024). World population prospects 2024. United Nations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Dwi Listyaningsih, Rejokirono Rejokirono, Welius Purbonuswanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
