REPRESENTASI MENTAL DAN PROSES KOGNITIF YANG MENDASARI TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL AND CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (TPACK)

Tomi Listiawan

Abstract


TPACK adalah sebuah kerangka kerja (framework) yang menggambarkan pengetahuan yang diperlukan guru untuk mengintegrasikan teknologi dalam merancang, melaksanakan, serta mengevaluasi pembelajaran. TPACK menggabungkan strategi berpikir kapan, dimana, dan bagaimana menggunakan suatu ranah pengetahuan (technology, pedagogy, dan content) dengan berbagai strategi pembelajaran dengan menggunakan teknologi yang tepat. Oleh beberapa penulis, TPACK dipahami sebagai potongan-potongan pengetahuan yang tidak koheren satu sama lain, di lain pihak, terdapat ahli yang memahami TPACK sebagai teori-teori yang koheren. Makalah ini mendeskripsikan kajian literatur tentang dua hal tersebut, kemudian menyajikan peluang studi dan penelitian terkait proses kognisi yang mendasari TPACK

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292–302.

Bearison, J. D., & Dorval, B. (2002). Collaborative cognition. Westport, CT: Ablex.

Cavus, Nadire & Huseyin Uzunboylu.(2009).Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,1(2009), 434–438

Despres, Charles & Chauval, Daniele.(2000).Knowledge Horizons: The Present and The Promise of Knowledge Management”. Boston, Oxford, Auckland, Johannesberg, Melbourne, New Delhi:Butterworth Heinemann.

Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using technological pedagogical content knowledge framework to design online environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing, 41(3), 319-346

Eggen, Paul., Kauchak, Don. (2007). Educational Psychology Windows on Classroom 7th ed .New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In Berliner, D. C., & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Guerrero, S. (2010). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 26(4), 132-139.

Harrington, R. A. (2008). The development of preservice teachers’ technology specific pedagogy. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 69(3).

Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3833-3840). Chesapeake,VA: AACE

Koh, J. L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers' technology integration expertise through the TPACKdeveloping instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35-58.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators ,New York, NY: Routledge.

Koehler, Matthew J., and Punya Mishra. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge?. Contemporary issues in Technology and Teacher education, (1), 60-70

Listiawan, T., & Baskoro, W. W. (2015). Analisis Technological Content Knowledge (TCK ) Calon Guru Matematika Dalam Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Geometri Dinamis, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 827–834

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Motiwalla, Luvai F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation, Computers & Education, 49(2007), 581–596 .

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.

Niess, M. L. (2006). Guest editorial: Preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6, 1-9.

Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4-24.

Niess, M. L., Suharwoto, G., Lee, K., & Sadri, P. (2006, April). Guiding inservice mathematics teachers in developing TPCK. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.

Niess, M. L., Lee, J. K., & Kajder, S. B. (2008). Guiding learning with technology. Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.

Parkay, F. W., & Stanford, B. H. (2009). Becoming a teacher (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon

Santrock, J. W. (2006). Educational psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.

Shafer, K. G. (2008). Learning to teach with technology through an apprenticeship model. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 8(1), 27-44.

Sharples, Mike.(2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning, Computers & Education,34(2000), 177-193.

Sharples dkk.(2003). Guidelines for learning in a mobile environment MOBIlearn/UoN,UoB,OU/D4.1/1.0.

Shavelson, R., Ruiz-Primo, A., Li, M., & Ayala,C. (2003, August). Evaluating new approaches to assessing learning (CSE Report 604). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. HarvardEducational Review. 57(1).

So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116.

Tee, M., & Lee, S. (2011). From socialisation to internalisation: Cultivating technological pedagogical content knowledge through problem-based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 89-104.

Thompson, A., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38-64.

uit Beijerse, R. P. (2000). Questions in knowledge management: Defining and conceptualizing a phenomenon. Journal of Knowledge Management,3, 94-109.

Shavelson, R., Ruiz-Primo, A., Li, M., & Ayala, C. (2003). Evaluating new approaches to assessing learning (CSE Report 604). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation.

Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In Calderhead, J. (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104–124). London, UK: Cassell.

Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational psychology: Active learning edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

View My Stats