Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Strategies for Improving the Quality of E-Government-Based Public Services

Mario Loe Sina

Abstract


This study aims to analyze digital transformation strategies in public administration as an effort to improve the quality of e-government-based public services. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design supported by a literature review. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation at government agencies that have implemented digital-based services. Data analysis was conducted interactively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion using triangulation techniques to ensure data validity. The results show that digital transformation has a positive impact on improving the quality of public services, particularly in aspects of reliability, responsiveness, transparency, and ease of access to services. The implementation of e-government systems can accelerate administrative processes, reduce complicated bureaucratic procedures, and increase service accountability. However, challenges faced include limited technological infrastructure, the digital literacy gap among the public, and resistance from some officials to change. The success of digital transformation is greatly influenced by visionary leadership, adaptive regulatory support, and increased human resource competency. Therefore, digital transformation strategies must be implemented in an integrated and sustainable manner to achieve public services that are effective, inclusive, and responsive to community needs.

Keywords


Digital Transformation; Public Administration; E-Government; Quality of Public Services Bureaucratic Reform.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128.

Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation, and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25.

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.

Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2019). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 1–21.

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.

Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment. SAGE Publications.

Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.

Nam, T. (2019). Digital government and public administration. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 373–384.

OECD. (2020). Digital government index: 2019 results. OECD Publishing.

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.*

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

United Nations. (2022). United Nations E-Government Survey 2022. United Nations.

West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v8i1.10464

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Duarte Braganca

View My Stats

Lisensi Creative Commons
JIHAD : Ilmu Administrasi dan Hukum 2745-9489 (Print), 2746-3842 (Elektronik) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.

Alamat: Jl. Lingkar Selatan, Perum Elit kota Mataram Asri Blok O. No. 35, Jempong Baru, Sekarbela, Kota Mataram NTB. Indonesia