Legal Review Of The Debtor's Obligation To Settle Debts Even Though The Fiducia Collateral Has Been Returned: Study of Decision Number 300/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Btm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v8i2.10600Keywords:
Fiduciary Security, Debtor Obligations, Legal Protection, Non-Performing Loans, Court Decision.Abstract
This study aims to examine the legal obligation of debtors to repay their debts after the fiduciary collateral object has been returned to the creditor, as well as to analyze the forms of legal protection that can be provided to debtors within fiduciary agreements. In addition, this research also analyzes the legal considerations of judges in the Decision of the Batam District Court Number 300/Pdt.G/2024/PN Btm concerning fiduciary security disputes. This research employs a normative legal research method using both statutory and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources obtained through library research. The collected materials are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method, and conclusions are drawn through a deductive approach. The results indicate that the return of the fiduciary collateral object does not automatically eliminate the debtor’s obligation to repay the outstanding debt, as stipulated under Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security. However, in practice, there is often an imbalance of position between debtors and creditors, particularly in the execution process, which tends to lack transparency and may disadvantage the debtor. Therefore, stronger legal protection is required for debtors, especially in relation to the valuation and sale of the collateral object. The analysis of the court decision shows that the judge’s considerations tend to emphasize formal legal certainty, and have not fully reflected the principles of justice and legal protection for debtors.References
Ahmadi Miru, Hukum Konltrak danl Peranlcanlganl Konltrak, (Jakarta: Raja Grafinldo Persada, 2013), hlm. 24 https://repository.unlhas.ac.id/id/eprinlt/11063
Alifa Achmad Wahyu, Fokky Fuad, danl Aris Machmud, “Aspek Kepastianl Hukum dalam Perjanljianl Jaminlanl Fidusia,” Binlamulia Hukum 13, nlo. 2 (Desember 2024): 435, https://ejournlal.hukumunlkris.id/inldex.php/binlamulia/article/view/935/238
Bagas Ari Kusuma D., Komanlg Febrinlayanlti D., danl NLi Ketut Sari Adnlyanli, “Perlinldunlganl Hukum bagi Debitur yanlg Melakukanl Wanlprestasi terhadap Objek Jaminlanl Fidusia Ditinljau dari Unldanlg- Unldanlg NLomor 42 Tahunl 1999 tenltainlg Jaminlanl Fidusia,” Jurnlal Komunlitas Yustisia 3, nlo. 3 (2020): 271. file:///C:/Users/User/Downlloads/apsarihadii,+271-282+Made+Bagas+Ari+Kusuma+D.pdf
Kitab Unldanlg-Unldanlg Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), Pasal 1238 tenltanlg wanlprestasi.
Kitab Unldanlg-Unldanlg Hukum Perdata, Pasal 1338. https://peraturanl.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/47429/kuhpe
M. Yasir, “Aspek Hukum Jaminlanl Fidusia,” SALAM; Jurnlal Sosial & Budaya Syar-i, Fakultas Syariah danl Hukum UINL Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Vol. 3 NLo. 1 (2016): 75–92, file:///C:/Users/User/Downlloads/fathudinl,+Journlal+manlager,+5.+YASIR+edited+by+mara+citasi+gggg.pd
Munlir Fuady, Hukum Jaminlanl Utanlg, (Banldunlg: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013), hlm. 112. https://repository.unlpar.ac.id/hanldle/123456789/2080
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penlelitianl Hukum, (Jakarta: Kenlcanla, 2017), https://repository.uinljkt.ac.id/dspace/hanldle/123456789/52300
Philipus M. Hadjonl, Perlinldunlganl Hukum Bagi Rakyat Inldonlesia, Surabaya: Binla Ilmu, 1987, hlm. 25. https://repository.unlair.ac.id/38160
Putusanl Mahkamah Konlstitusi NLomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. https://www.mkri.id/inldex.php?page=web.Putusanl&id=
Putusanl Penlgadilanl NLegeri Batam NLomor 300/Pdt.G/2024/PNL.Btm. https://putusanl3.mahkamahagunlg.go.id
R. Setiawanl, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatanl, (Banldunlg: Binlacipta, 1994), hlm. 68.
Salim HS, Perkembanlganl Hukum Jaminlanl di Inldonlesia, (Jakarta: Raja Grafinldo Persada, 2014), hlm. 115. https://repository.unlair.ac.id/87915
Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, (Banldunlg: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000), hlm. 53.
Soerjonlo Soekanlto danl Sri Mamudji, Penlelitianl Hukum NLormatif: Suatu Tinljauanl Sinlgkat, (Jakarta: Raja Grafinldo Persada, 2010), hlm. 13. Inldustrial price policies anld econlomic progress / Edwinl G.NLourse Horace B.
Subekti, Hukum Perjanljianl, (Jakarta: Inltermasa, 2005), hlm. 45. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20133257
Sudiknlo Mertokusumo, Menlgenlal Hukum: Suatu Penlganltar (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007). https://www.google.com/search?q=Sudiknlo+Mertokusumo+Menlgenlal+Hukum
Tanl Kamelo, Hukum Jaminlanl Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhanl yanlg Didambakanl, (Banldunlg: Alumnli, 2006), hlm. 30 https://repositori.usu.ac.id/hanldle/123456789/16073
Unldanlg-Unldanlg NLomor 42 Tahunl 1999 tenltanlg Jaminlanl Fidusia, Pasal 1 anlgka 1 danl 2; Salim, Perkembanlganl Hukum Jaminlanl di Inldonlesia (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafinldo Persada, 2004), hlm. 60; D.Y. Witanlto, Hukum Perjanljianl Fidusia dalam Perjanljianl Pembiayaanl Konlsumenl (Banldunlg: Manldar Maju, 2015), hlm. 9. https://arl.ridwanlinlstitute.co.id/inldex.php/arl/article/downlload/225/162
Willy Tanljaya, Heryanlti, danl Ega Triwi Wijaya, “Tinljauanl Hukum Tenltanlg Penlerapanl Asas Pacta Sunlt Servanlda dalam Hukum Bisnlis terhadap Penlyelesaianl Kasus Wanlprestasi,” Unles Journlal of Swara Justisia, Vol. 9, NLo. 2, Juli 2025, hlm. 261, View of Tinljauanl Hukum Tenltanlg Penlerapanl Asas Pacta Sunlt Servanlda Dalam Hukum Bisnlis Terhadap Penlyelesaianl Kasus Wanlpestasi
Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinlar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016. https://www.google.com/search?q=Yahya+Harahap+Hukum+Acara+Perdata+Sinlar+Grafika
