Judicial Reasoning in Sentencing Class I Narcotics Crimes under Indonesian Criminal Law: A Case Study of Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Pst

Authors

  • Imam Syafii Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular, Indonesia
  • Appe Hutauruk Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular, Indonesia
  • Hotman Sinambela Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular, Indonesia
  • Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mpu Tantular, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/vqgjv440

Keywords:

Class I Narcotics Criminal Sentencing Indonesian Criminal Law Judicial Reasoning Legal Certainty

Abstract

Narcotics crimes remain one of the most significant challenges to criminal law enforcement in Indonesia, particularly concerning Class I narcotics, which carry a high potential for abuse and severe social consequences. Differences in judicial reasoning when imposing criminal sanctions may result in sentencing disparities and raise concerns regarding legal certainty, justice, and consistency in judicial decision-making. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning employed by judges in imposing criminal sanctions on Class I narcotics offenders and to examine whether the judicial considerations reflected in Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Pst are consistent with the provisions of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, and the fundamental principles of Indonesian criminal law. This research adopts a normative juridical approach using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research, including legislation, court decisions, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature, and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the judges’ reasoning was primarily based on legally admissible evidence, witness testimony, the defendant’s statement, material evidence, and relevant statutory provisions governing narcotics offenses. Furthermore, the court considered both aggravating and mitigating circumstances, reflecting juridical, philosophical, and sociological dimensions of criminal sentencing. The decision generally fulfills the principles of legal certainty, justice, and legal utility. Nevertheless, greater consistency in judicial reasoning is required to minimize sentencing disparities and strengthen the effectiveness of narcotics law enforcement in Indonesia. The study contributes to the development of Indonesian criminal law scholarship by providing a critical evaluation of judicial reasoning in narcotics cases and offering recommendations for more consistent sentencing practices.
Abstract Views 20PDF Downloads 12

References

Arief, B. N. (2018). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan tindak pidana narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(2), 215–233.

Asmara, R., & Rasyid, L. M. (2013). Perlindungan terhadap anak perempuan korban kejahatan kesusilaan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2).

Chazawi, A. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam tindak pidana narkotika. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(1), 45–62.

Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Sistem pembuktian dalam hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 6(3), 321–339.

Kusmawan, D. (2014). Perlindungan hak cipta atas buku. Yuridika, 19(2).

Mulyadi, L. (2016). Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5(2), 165–184.

Nst, V. F. H., Ichsan, R. N., & Panggabean, N. R. (2023). The effect of organizational commitment on employee performance at PT. Sentosa Deli Mandiri Medan. Jurnal Darma Agung, 31(1), 123–140.

Nst, V. F. H., Suma, D., Siregar, B. A., Ichsan, R. N., Panggabean, N. R., & Sibarani, J. P. (2023). Pendampingan pemasaran keripik ubi dalam meningkatkan penjualan berbasis digital di Desa Marendal 1 Kecamatan Patumbak, Deli Serdang–Sumatera Utara. Jurnal PKM Hablum Minannas, 2(1), 45–52.

Ramadhan, A. R. (2015). Pencemaran nama baik dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan).

Ratnadewi, N. N. E. (2014). Pelaksanaan transaksi e-commerce berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008. Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan).

Romi Asmara, & Laila M. Rasyid. (2013). Perlindungan terhadap anak perempuan korban kejahatan kesusilaan. Jurnal Panah Hukum, 1(1), 34–45.

Setyowati, K., dkk. (2005). Hak kekayaan intelektual dan tantangan implementasinya di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.

Sunarso, S. (2015). Politik hukum pemberantasan tindak pidana narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(4), 401–416.

Utami, D. A., & Lamonti, E. (2019). Perlindungan hak cipta dari tindakan pembajakan buku yang marak terjadi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik.

Venny Fraya Hartin Nst, Ichsan, R. N., & Panggabean, N. R. (2023). The effect of organizational commitment on employee performance at PT. Sentosa Deli Mandiri Medan. Jurnal Darma Agung, 31(2).

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Judicial Reasoning in Sentencing Class I Narcotics Crimes under Indonesian Criminal Law: A Case Study of Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Pst. (2026). JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi, 8(3), 1132-1140. https://doi.org/10.58258/vqgjv440