Restorative Justice-Based Rehabilitation for Narcotics Offenders in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis of the Attorney General’s Guideline Number 18 of 2021

Authors

  • Najwa Aulia Ramadhani Universitas Mpu Tantular
  • Appe Hutauruk Universitas Mpu Tantular
  • Hotman Sinambela Universitas Mpu Tantular
  • Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean Universitas Mpu Tantular

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/ng9qyh70

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Narcotics Rehabilitation, Narcotics Addicts, Attorney General's, Criminal Law

Abstract

The increasing number of narcotics abuse cases in Indonesia has encouraged the government to adopt a restorative justice approach that prioritizes rehabilitation over imprisonment for eligible narcotics offenders. The Attorney General’s Guideline Number 18 of 2021 serves as the primary legal framework governing the implementation of rehabilitation through legal proceedings for narcotics users, addicts, and victims of narcotics abuse. This study aims to examine the juridical basis, legal relevance, and practical implementation of rehabilitation under the Guideline, as well as to identify the legal challenges encountered in its application. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The study analyzes primary legal materials, including Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and the Attorney General’s Guideline Number 18 of 2021, supported by secondary legal materials from recent scholarly publications related to restorative justice, rehabilitation, and narcotics law. The findings indicate that rehabilitation through legal proceedings is legally consistent with the principles of restorative justice and the ultimum remedium doctrine, particularly for narcotics users requiring medical and social recovery rather than punitive sanctions. Nevertheless, the implementation of the Guideline continues to face several challenges, including the absence of clear legal benchmarks distinguishing narcotics addicts, abusers, and victims, inconsistent interpretations among law enforcement agencies, dependence on the Integrated Assessment Team’s recommendations, limited rehabilitation facilities, and inadequate post-rehabilitation monitoring. These issues may reduce legal certainty and create disparities in law enforcement practices. Therefore, strengthening legal standards, improving institutional coordination, and developing more objective assessment criteria are essential to enhance the effectiveness and consistency of restorative justice-based rehabilitation within Indonesia’s criminal justice system
Abstract Views 4PDF Downloads 2

References

Amaliyah, R., & Riani, D. S. (2024). Dampak psikologis penyalahgunaan narkotika terhadap tahanan di Kepolisian Resor (Polres) Musi Rawas. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 14(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.30999/jpkm.v14i2.3404

Analisis Pedoman Jaksa Agung Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 terhadap keadilan restoratif dalam perkara tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika. (2026). Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62281/9yjw2p58

Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan prinsip restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana narkotika. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(2), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no2.1667

Budiawan, S. V., Mulyadi, M., & Yunara, E. (2025). Analisis yuridis disparitas pidana terhadap putusan pengadilan penyalah guna narkotika kaitannya dengan barang bukti melebihi penyalah guna. Jurnal Rectum, 7(1), 45–63.

Damayanti, P. L. (2024). Peran lembaga rehabilitasi dalam sistem hukum pidana narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(4), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i4.4470

Hamdani, D. A., Arliman, L., & Amiruddin. (2025). Efektivitas rehabilitasi pengguna narkotika terhadap tingkat kesadaran hukum pelaku. Ekasakti Legal Science Journal, 2(4), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.60034/n9wdex74

Heriyanto, H., Winarno, R., & Ariesta, W. (2025). Penyelesaian tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika melalui restorative justice di tingkat kejaksaan. Yurijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.51213/yurijaya.v7i1.193

Hidayatun, S., & Widowaty, Y. (2020). Konsep rehabilitasi bagi pengguna narkotika yang berkeadilan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1209

Kurniawatie, E. (2024). Dasar pertimbangan hakim terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika ditinjau dari aspek rehabilitasi didasarkan Pasal 127 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang narkotika. SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(12), 1374–1396.

Mahendra, F., & Samosir, P. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi pecandu narkotika dalam perspektif hukum pidana positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 12(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.20961/jhp.v12i1.65432

Pambudi, M. R., Rozah, U., & Sutanti, R. D. (2022). Relevansi ketentuan sanksi rehabilitasi pecandu narkotika dengan tujuan pemidanaan. Diponegoro Law Journal, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2022.33591

Prakoso, A. (2013). Kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap penyalahguna narkotika dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.v2i1.132

Pratama, A. R. (2025). Menggugat efektivitas pemenjaraan terhadap pecandu narkotika dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 14(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p06

Putra, I. M. A., & Widnyana, I. W. (2023). Hambatan eksekusi rehabilitasi narkotika pada tahap penuntutan berdasarkan Pedoman Jaksa Agung Nomor 18 Tahun 2021. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 11(4), 782–795. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i04.p12

Ramadan, R. (2023). Kebijakan formulasi hukum pidana terhadap tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 10(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v10i1.8741

Ramadhan, A., & Soponyono, E. (2022). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penyelesaian perkara penyalahgunaan narkotika melalui keadilan restoratif. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.215-228

Setyawan, D., & Rochaeti, N. (2022). Urgensi pelaksanaan pendekatan restorative justice dalam perkara tindak pidana narkotika. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(5), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i5.234

Setyowati, R., & Handayani, T. (2024). Dualisme status hukum pecandu narkotika dalam implementasi kebijakan kriminal. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 24(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.189-202

Sihombing, D. C., Syahrin, A., Ablisar, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Penguatan kewenangan jaksa selaku dominus litis sebagai upaya optimalisasi penegakan hukum pidana berorientasi keadilan restoratif. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v3i2.42

Suhariyanto, B. (2018). Restorative justice dalam kebijakan kriminalisasi penyalahguna narkotika. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.491-504

Downloads

Published

2026-09-17

How to Cite

Restorative Justice-Based Rehabilitation for Narcotics Offenders in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis of the Attorney General’s Guideline Number 18 of 2021. (2026). JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi, 8(3), 1170-1180. https://doi.org/10.58258/ng9qyh70