Application Analysis of Criminal Sanctions for Embezzlement of Tax Fees Deposits for Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) Acquisition Committed by Notaries - PPAT
Abstract
In practice, Notary or PPAT often act as intermediaries for depositing the Acquisition of Rights over Land and Buildings Tax BPHTB payments to facilitate the transaction process. However, it is regrettable that some individuals serving as Notaries occasionally abuse their power and authority regarding BPHTB payments. The type of research conducted in this paper is Doctrinal. The results of the discussion indicate that the responsibility of a Notary should be to carry out their duties and authority properly and firmly, without violating the rules governing their position. The conclusion drawn from this analysis is that a Notary is responsible for the assistance provided in the BPHTB payment process for clients, and not for exploiting the money for personal interests. Such actions can cause losses to clients and the state. The legal consequences for Notaries who abuse their authority include criminal sanctions and the obligation to compensate clients who suffer losses due to their actions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Adjie, Habib. Hukum Notaris Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008.
Anand, Ghansham. Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris Di Indonesia. Sidoharjo: Zifatama Publisher, 2014.
B.Ilyas, Wirawan dan Richard Burton, Hukum Pajak, Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2004. Anwar, Moch (Dading). Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus (KUHP Buku II), Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 1990.
Gunadi, Ismu dan Jonaedi Efendi, Cepat dan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group. 2014.
Komariah, Edisi Revisi Hukum Perdata. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2001
Mubarok, Nafi’. Buku Diktat Hukum Dagang. Surabaya: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Sunan Ampel, 2016.
Parlindungan, A.P. Pendaftaran Tanah di Indonesia. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, 2009.
Sjaifurrachman. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.
Siahaan, Marihot Pahalamana. Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan Teori Dan Praktek, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2003.
Soedjendro, J. Kartini. Perjanjian Peralihan Hak atas Tanah yang Berpotensi Konflik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 2001.
Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana (Revisi Ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010.
Waluyo, Doddy Radjasa. Hanya Ada Satu Pejabat Umum Notaris. Tangerang: Media Notaris, 2005.
Jurnal
Leomuwafiq, Ghazi. "Pertangungg Jawaban Notaris Ppat Dalam Melakukan Pelayanan Pembayaran Pajak Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan (BPHTB)." Jurnal Media Hukum dan Peradilan 5, no. 1 (2019): 101-117.
Sari, Devi Nurmala. "Analisis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Penggelapan Titipan Uang Pajak Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan (Bphtb) yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris–PPAT." PhD diss., UNS (Sebelas Maret University), 2017.
Wijaya, Eveline. "PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS/PPAT TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG ATAS PEMBAYARAN BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH (BPHTB)(Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 210/Pid. B/2022/PN SBY)." JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana 5, no. 3 (2023): 215-223.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang – Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris
Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana [Wetboek van Strafrecht]. Diterjemahkan oleh Moeljatno. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011.
Internet
https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/waspada-ini-pasal-pasal-yang-sering-menjerat-profesi-notaris-dan-ppat-lt5795e599691ec/
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwinieWMoMSEAxUTyzgGHRSCDQAQFnoECCoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fnotarylaw.journal.ulm.ac.id%2Findex.php%2Fnolaj%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F13%2F11&usg=AOvVaw1og25Na2L07ZZYaKul1xTA&opi=89978449
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i2.6938
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Enrian Yaurin Abdilla
View My Stats