Juridical Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Denying the Rights of Restitution to Victims of Human Trafficking Crimes (Study Decision No. 359 / Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Cbi)
Abstract
The implementation of providing restitution is not easy for the court to grant. assist in fulfilling the rights of restitution to victims because prosecutors in carrying out loans have difficulty presenting evidence of expenditure to determine the size of compensation. Settlement case No. 359 /Pid.Sus/2020/PN Cbi is one of the cases where the panel of judges rejected the request for restitution requested by public submission. This research aims to determine the legal provisions governing restitution as a right for victims of human trafficking crimes in Indonesia, analyze the considerations of judges who deny the right to restitution for victims of TIP and enforce the judge's decision that refuses to grant the right to restitution for victims of TIP in the case of Decision No. 359 / Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Cbi. This research is included in normative juridical research with data obtained from literature studies or library research. The results of this research are that the legal provisions governing restitution as a right of victims of criminal acts of human trafficking in Indonesia are regulated in Article 48 of Law 21/2017 which basically regulates a series of mechanisms for implementing provisions for providing restitution for criminal acts of human trafficking. The panel of judges was correct in providing a legal opinion in rejecting the request for restitution. This causes general lending to not follow the terms, procedures and procedures for requests for restitution, and the panel of judges cannot decide on its own general order regarding the amount of restitution without being based on the provisions regarding restitution which are considered correct and in accordance with applicable regulations so that the panel of judges must request restitution. what is being requested is not in accordance with the applicable law and the impedance of a judge's sentence who refuses to grant a TIP victim the right to restitution. The victim will suffer either physical injury or physical or mental deterioration due to the absence of compensation given to him as a victim of the criminal act of trafficking in persons.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Y. P. Ginting, “Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Hasil Dari Korupsi Yang Mendapat Pengampunan Pajak,” J. Litigasi, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 266–285, 2020.
S. Rachmad, Dagang Manusia; Kajian Traffickingterhadap Perempuan dan Anak di Jawa Timur. Yogyakarta: Lappera Puataka Utama, 2003.
M. L. SUGIYANTO, “Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang,” 2022.
“Data TPPO Tahun 2023,” Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, 2023. https://katalog.data.go.id/dataset/data-tppo-th-2023.
A. Hasanudin, “Penerapan Ketentuan Restitusi Kasus Tppo Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana,” Nestor Tanjungpura J. Law, vol. Vol. 11, no. 2, 2015.
F. Afifah, “Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang,” 2022.
Sariyulis, “Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Terhadap Korban Jarimah Perencanaan Studi Putusan Nomor 16/JN/2021/MS.Jth dan 1/JN/2022/MS.Jth),” 2023.
T. P. Amboina, “Pelaksanaan Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Korban,” 2024.
P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.
M. F. ND and Y. Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
A. Zuliah, Hak Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2005.
M. D. Manullang, “Analisis Penjatuhan Putusan Bebas (Vrijspraak) Dalam Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Oleh HakimPengadilan Negeri Semarang (Studi Putusan Nomor 49/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn.Smg),” 2020.
R. Setiawan, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak,” 2009.
S. Permatasari, “Mekanisme Pemenuhan Restitusi Oleh Pelaku Tindak Pidana yang Mengakomodir Kepentingan Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Sebagai Bagian Integral dari Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” Padjadjaran Law Rev., vol. Vol. 6, pp. 74–88, 2018.
A. Wibowo, Adhi Wibowo, Perlindungan Hukum Korban Amuk Massa (Sebuah Tinjauan Viktimologi). Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2013.
I. D. S. Saimima, Rekonstruksi Pidana Restitusi dan Pidana Kurungan Pengganti dalam Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Yogyakarta: PENERBIT DEEPUBLISH (Grup Penerbitan CV BUDI UTAMA), 2012.
S. Susiana, D. Wahyuni, D. Martiany, F. Alawiyah, and A. M. Fahham, Perdagangan Orang: Pencegahan, Penanganan, dan Pelindungan Korban. Yogyakarta: Azza Grafika, Anggota IKAPI DIY, 2012.
Rina Arum Prastyanti, "Urgensi Pengaturan Artifisial Intelligence Untuk Mendukung Bisnis UMKM." Rio Law Jurnal, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024.
Nugrahaningsih, Widi, and Novemy Triyandari Nugroho. "Analisis Yuridis Pemanfaatan Aset Kripto untuk Kepentingan Investasi dan Transaksi di Indonesia." Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2024.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i2.6939
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nancy Natalia Dharmawan, Aris Prio Agus Santoso, Aryono Aryono
View My Stats