Disparity in Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding the Age Limits for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates (Study of Decision No. 29/PUU-XXI/2023 and Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the Age Limit for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates)

Ashari Ashari, Riska Ari Amalia, Khairul Umam, Rachman Maulana Kafrawi

Abstract


The aim of this research is to determine the disparity in constitutional court decisions regarding the age threshold for presidential and vice-presidential candidates. This research is a type of normative legal research that uses statutory, conceptual and case approach methods. The results of the research explain that if examined from the aspect of considerations of constitutional court judges in case number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, it is stated that determining the minimum age of the President and Vice President is the domain of law makers (open legal policy), while in case number 90/PUU- XXI/2023 the constitutional court interpreted that the existence of an open legal policy (open legal policy) although it can be accepted in constitutional practice, but in its development the constitutional court could ignore or set aside while giving a re-interpretation of the norm which is an open legal policy, while from the adoption procedure decision in the judge's deliberative meeting held in case Number 29/PUU-XXI/2023, the chairman of the constitutional court, Anwar Usman, did not participate in discussing and deciding to avoid conflicts of interest, while in case Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 with the same constitutionality issue the chairman The constitutional court participated in discussing and deciding the case with the decision being granted in part, namely being at least 40 years old or having/currently held a position elected through general elections, including regional head elections.


Keywords


Disparitas, Mahakamah Konstitusi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Faqih, M. "Nilai-Nilai Filosofi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Final dan Mengikat." Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.7, No. 3 (2016):

Gusman, Delfina. "Menguji Kenegarawanan Hakim Konstitusi Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023." Nagari Law Review, Vol 7, No. 2 (2023)

Imam, Aditya Perdana dan Muhammad. "Judisialisasi Politik Dalam Putusan MK Terkait Ambang Batas Usia Cawapres Dalam Pilpres 2024." Jurnal Pengawasan Pemilu (Bawaslu DKI Jakarta ), 2024

Konstitusi, Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2010.

Kusyandi, Adi. "Disparitas Putusan Hakim Pidana Berkualitas Yang mencerminkan Rasa Keadilan Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia." Jurnal Yustitia (Faculty Of Law Universitas Wirodola) Vol.9, No. 1 (2023):

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. 8. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2013.

Permadi, Heru. "Konflik Kepentingan Dalam Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023." MAKSIGAMA, Vol. 17, No. 2 (2023):

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945

Undang-Undang 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 20220

https://perludem.org/2023/10/17/tafsir-serampangan-inkonsistensi-logika-dan-konflik-kepentingan-mahkamah-konstitusi-dalam-putusan-no-90-puu-xxi-2023/

https://umsida.ac.id/kata-pakar-umsida-soal-putusan-mk-no-90-tahun-2023/

https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=19660&menu=2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v6i2.6959

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Ashari Ashari

View My Stats