Reconstruction of the Election System Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024: A Legal-Normative Review of the Separation of National and Regional Elections

Authors

  • MH. Isnaeni Univeristas Surakarta (UNSA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v7i3.9264

Keywords:

Constitutional Court Decision 135/PUU-XXII/2024, Split Elections, Substantive Democracy, Electoral Architecture, Electoral Law Reform.

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 marks a significant milestone in the reconstruction of Indonesia’s electoral system, particularly concerning the separation between national elections—including the presidential, DPR, and DPD elections—and regional elections for governors, regents/mayors, and local legislative councils (DPRD). This article focuses on analyzing the normative and institutional implications of the decision and its impact on the legal architecture of elections in Indonesia. Employing a normative juridical approach and drawing comparative insights from electoral systems in other democratic countries, this study finds that the separation of elections has the potential to enhance substantive democratic quality, improve voter focus, and reduce the technical and administrative burden on electoral bodies. Nonetheless, such a policy demands a comprehensive restructuring of the legal framework, including institutional design, the sequencing of electoral stages, and regulatory harmonization between central and regional authorities. Thus, the findings of this research serve as a conceptual foundation for advancing an electoral system that is more effective, representative, and aligned with democratic integrity principles.

References

Afrianto, D. (2024). Menakar Efisiensi Pemilu Pasca Putusan MK. Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 19(1), 55–70.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2023). Konstitusi dan Pemilu. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Budiman, A. (2022). Demokrasi dan Reproduksi Kekuasaan: Studi Kritis atas Praktik Kepemiluan. Jakarta: Obor Press.

Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hadar, G. M. (2020). Kepemiluan dan Tata Kelola Demokrasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2024). Putusan MK No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024.

Nuraini, R. (2021). Electoral System Reform in Post-Reform Indonesia: A Legal-Political Perspective. Indonesian Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(2), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.31078/ijcl.v18i2.732

Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Santosa, M. A. (2023). Evaluating Legal Certainty in Electoral Law Reform. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2023.v20i1.938

Soekanto, S. (1986). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Wahyudi, A. (2024). Harmonisasi Undang-Undang Pemilu: Antara Kepastian Hukum dan Dinamika Politik. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 54(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol54.no1.2147

Widodo, R. (2024). Reformulasi Regulasi Pemilu: Antara Norma dan Praktik. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 21(2), 88–105.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Reconstruction of the Election System Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024: A Legal-Normative Review of the Separation of National and Regional Elections. (2025). JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v7i3.9264