Cyber Legal Responsibility for Personal Data Leaks from the Perspective of Substantive Justice in Indonesia

Authors

  • Hariang Dede Taufik Universitas Langlangbuana
  • Haerul Apandi Universitas Langlangbuana
  • Rudolf Paskaries Universitas Langlangbuana
  • Hariyanto Aritonang Universitas Langlangbuana
  • Andi Haruman Universitas Langlangbuana
  • Nugraha Pranadita Universitas Langlangbuana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v8i1.10350

Keywords:

Personal Data Protection, Cyber Legal Liability, Digital Corporations

Abstract

Digital transformation has increased the use of personal data as a strategic asset in various sectors, but it has also given rise to the risk of data leaks that cause material and immaterial losses to society. This study aims to analyse cyber legal liability for personal data leaks in Indonesia using a substantive justice perspective. The method used is descriptive qualitative through a literature study of regulations, legal doctrines, and data protection practices to obtain a comprehensive understanding of legal responsibility in the digital ecosystem. The results of the study show that cyber legal responsibility still faces challenges of cross-border jurisdiction, weak implementation of the responsibility of digital corporations as legal subjects, and suboptimal restoration of victims' rights. A damage-based jurisdiction approach is needed to reach global digital actors, while strengthening corporate accountability is key to preventing avoidance of responsibility. From a substantive justice perspective, the legal system needs to be oriented towards the effective restoration of victims' rights through compensation, ongoing protection, and system improvements. This study emphasises that strengthening an adaptive, accountable, and victim-oriented cyber legal framework is an important prerequisite for realising fair personal data protection and increasing public trust. 

References

Brandeis, L. D., & Warren, S. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. University of California Press.

Kshetri, N. (2014). Cybercrime and cybersecurity in the global South. Palgrave Macmillan.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nazir, M. (2013). Metode penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

Solove, D. J. (2006). A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(3), 477–560.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Svantesson, D. J. B. (2017). Solving the internet jurisdiction puzzle. Oxford University Press.

United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations.

Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. Atheneum.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01