Bagaimana Kualitas Data pada Survey Web ?

Authors

  • Rizal Kamsurya Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Media Nusantara Citra
  • Yetti Supriyati Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Ahmad Muchlisin Natas Pasaribu Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i1.1739

Keywords:

Kualitas Data, Survey Web

Abstract

Peningkatan jaringan internet di setiap daerah, disertai meningkatnya pengguna smartphone/tablet membuat peneliti mulai meninggalkan pengumpulan data secara tradisional seperti tatap muka dan beralih memanfaatkan teknologi untuk pengumpulan data, khususnya dalam penelitian survey. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kualitas data yang diperoleh dalam survey web melalui berbagai teknik pengumpulan serta jenis istrumen yang digunakan. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melaui studi literatur untuk menganalisis kualitas data yang diperoleh melalui survery web (online). Artikel yang dianalisis berasal dari berbagai sumber yaitu google scholar, eric library, dan scopus. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif yang terdiri dari reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kualitas data yang diperoleh dalam berbagai survey web dengan berbagai teknik pengumpulan data memiliki berbagai permasalahan sehingga menimbulkan terjadinya kesalahan pengukuran yang sistematis dan bias. Faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas data yang diperoleh dalam web survey yaitu penentuan sampel, pola gerakan responden dalam memberikan tanggapan, format pertanyaan yang digunakan dalam instrumen, alat yang digunakan dalam memberikan tanggapan HP/PC, serta tampilan dan pengingat yang digunakan dalam instrumen

References

Berchtold, A. (2019). Treatment and reporting of item-level missing data in social science research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(5), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1563978

Blumenberg, C., & Barros, A. J. D. (2018). Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Public Health, 63(6), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1108-4

Blumenberg, C., Menezes, A. M. B., Gonçalves, H., Assunção, M. C. F., Wehrmeister, F. C., Barros, F. C., & Barros, A. J. D. (2019). The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: a randomised trial. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1629755

Höhne, J. K., & Schlosser, S. (2019). SurveyMotion: what can we learn from sensor data about respondents’ completion and response behavior in mobile web surveys? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(4), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1550279

Kamsurya, R. (2019). Desain Research: Penerapan Pendekatan PMRI Konsep Luas Permukaan dan Volum Kerucut untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.30656/gauss.v2i1.1386

Kamsurya, R. (2020). Learning Evaluation of Mathematics during the Pandemic Period COVID-19 in Jakarta. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), ep2008. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8439

Kamsurya, R., & Saputri, V. (2020). Influence of Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) and Self Efficacy Learning Models on HOTS Problem-Based Problem Solving Ability. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 6(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v6i2.1396

Liu, M. (2019). The effect of interviewer evaluation of respondents’ attitudes and understanding on future survey participation in a panel study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(4), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1556379

McGaha, K. K., & D’Urso, P. A. (2019). A non-traditional validation tool: using cultural domain analysis for interpretive phenomenology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1621474

Rahmatih, A. N., Maulyda, M. A., & Syazali, M. (2020). Refleksi Nilai Kearifan Lokal (Local Wisdom) dalam Pembelajaran Sains Sekolah Dasar: Literature Review. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i2.1663

Revilla, M. (2017). Are There Differences Depending on the Device Used to Complete a Web Survey (PC or Smartphone) for Order-by-click Questions? Field Methods, 29(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16674701

Revilla, M., & Couper, M. P. (2018). Testing different rank order question layouts for PC and smartphone respondents. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 695–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1471371

Saputri, V., & Kamsurya, R. (2020). Mathematical Representation Ability and Mathematics Self Efficacy in CORE Learning Models with Open-Ended Approach. 3(2), 112–119.

Silber, H., Danner, D., & Rammstedt, B. (2019a). The impact of respondent attentiveness on reliability and validity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1507378

Silber, H., Danner, D., & Rammstedt, B. (2019b). The impact of respondent attentiveness on reliability and validity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1507378

Toninelli, D., & Revilla, M. (2016). Smartphones vs PCs: Does the device affect the web survey experience and the measurement error for sensitive topics? A replication of the mavletova & Couper’s 2013 experiment. Survey Research Methods, 10(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2016.v10i2.6274

Watson, N., & Wooden, M. (2009). Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response. Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, 1975, 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.ch10

Yan, T., Curtin, R., & Jans, M. (2010). Trends in income nonresponse over two decades. Journal of Official Statistics, 26(1), 145–164.

Zwarun, L., & Hall, A. (2014). What’s going on? Age, distraction, and multitasking during online survey taking. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.041

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-01-15

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education

Section

Articles

License

Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

How to Cite

Bagaimana Kualitas Data pada Survey Web ?. (2021). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i1.1739