The Study of APIPA Model Concept Development through the Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v10i3.7362Keywords:
Evaluation of the APIPA Model Program, Analytical Hierarchy Process.Abstract
Improving the quality of teacher performance programs certainly requires the important role of teachers and school leaders. The role of teachers can be seen in the implementation of performance programs which require systematic and structured evaluation of performance programs. The results of the evaluation and monitoring of the implementation of the teacher performance program by school leaders are used as material for consideration in making decisions about the quality level of the teacher performance program. Making this decision is very difficult for a school leader in evaluating teacher performance programs. In this case, a modified program evaluation was developed by the CIPP model program evaluation with ALKIN model program evaluation. The research used Development Research (R&D) using 4D design (Define, Design, Development, Dissemination). The Define stage conducts a literature review regarding weaknesses in the CIPP and ALKIN model program evaluation syntax. The Design stage prepares the topology related to the main ideas of the program evaluation development syntax. The Development stage carries out operational definitions and indicators for each program evaluation syntax. The dissemination stage carries out an expert judgment or assessment of the experts who are analyzed using the analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to determine the consistency of the program evaluation development concept. The results using AHP are consistent with the concept of developing the APIPA model program evaluation which has the syntax Assessment, Planning, Implementation, Product, and Appreciation for evaluating teacher performance programs.References
Alkin, M. C., & Christie, Christina, A. (2004). Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences. In New Directions for Evaluation (Issue 97).
Alkin, M., & Christie, C. (2012). An Evaluation Theory Tree. In Evaluation Roots. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157.n2
Alkin, M. C., & Patton, M. Q. (2020). The Birth and Adaptation of Evaluation Theories. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 16(35). https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i35.637
Alkin, M. C., & Stecher, B. (1983). Evaluation in context: Information use in elementary school decision making. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(83)90004-4
Alkin, & Woolley. (1969). A Model for Educational Evaluation. PLEDGE Conference, 8-11 Oktober Di San Dimas.
Carden, F., & Alkin, M. C. (2012). Evaluation Roots: An International Perspective. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17). https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v8i17.348
Christie, C. A., & Alkin, M. C. (2008). Evaluation theory tree re-examined. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.07.001
Davidson, E. J. (2006). Book Review: Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006287988
Evendi, E., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2021). Evaluation of Student Learning Outcomes in Problem-Based Learning: Study of Its Implementation and Reflection of Successful Factors. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1099
Lindarti, A., & Hasanudin, R. (2021). Evaluasi Program Permainan Tradisional (Cublak-Cublak Suweng) Menggunakan Model Alkin. ABNA: Journal of Islamic Early …, 2(1).
Matthews, J. M., & Hudson, A. M. (2001). Guidelines for evaluating parent training programs. Family Relations, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00077.x
Mertens, D. M. (2020). Research and evaluation in education and psychology : integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods / Donna M. Mertens, Gallaudet University. In Research and evaluation in education and psychology : integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods.
Montgomery, C., & Fernández-Cárdenas, J. M. (2018). Teaching STEM education through dialogue and transformative learning: global significance and local interactions in Mexico and the UK. In Journal of Education for Teaching (Vol. 44, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422606
Muñoz-Cantero, J. M., Espiñeira-Bellón, E., & Losada-Puente, L. (2017). El desempeño profesional del evaluador en instituciones de atención á la diversidad funcional. Dificultades y retos. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.23.1.3920
Onion, A. J. (2004). What use is maths to me? A report on the outcomes from student focus groups. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/23.4.189
Raj Acharya, B. (2017). Factors Affecting Difficulties in Learning Mathematics by Mathematics Learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11
Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The cipp model: Applications in language program evaluation. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.19.1360
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP Model for Program Evaluation. In: Evaluation Models. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol. 6. In Evaluation Models.
Syahrir, S., Supriyati, Y., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Evaluasi Dampak Program Pendidikan Jarak Jauh (PJJ) melalui model CIPP pada Kinerja Dosen aspek Pembelajaran pada Masa Pendemi Covid 19. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i1.1716
Taut, S. M., & Alkin, M. C. (2003). Program Staff Perceptions of Barriers to Evaluation Implementation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400205
Tseng, K. H., Ray Diez, C., Lou, S. J., Tsai, H. L., & Tsai, T. S. (2010). Using the context, input, process and product model to assess an engineering curriculum. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
