Effectiveness of Direct learning on IPA Learning

Kharisty Afriani; Abdul Rafid Fakhrun Gani

doi:10.58258/jime.v11i1.7935

Effectiveness of Direct learning on IPA Learning

Kharisty Afriani, Abdul Rafid Fakhrun Gani

Abstract

The Direct learning model was one of the learning models commonly used in science education; however, it was considered less effective and resulted in monotonous learning. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Direct learning model in science education. The research was conducted at Muhammadiyah Private Junior High School 1 Medan using an experimental method with a pre-experimental design model of the one-shot case study type. The results of the study showed that Direct learning was not effective for science education, as the calculated t-value of 0.519 was smaller than the t-table value of 1.697. The ineffectiveness of Direct learning was due to its teacher-centered nature, which was unsuitable for science education that required students to be active in the learning process. Therefore, the Direct learning model was not suitable for application in science education.

Keywords

Direct Learning Pre-experimental design One shot case study

Full Text:

PDF

References

R. Pratama, M. Alamsyah, M. F. S, G. Marhento, and Jupriadi, “Pemanfaatan Canva Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Interaktif dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Peserta Didik Madrasah Aliyah pada Mata Pelajaran IPA,” Biol. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2023.

I. Nurhayati, K. S. E. Pramono, and A. Farida, “Keterampilan 4C (Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication And Collaboration) dalam Pembelajaran IPS untuk Menjawab Tantangan Abad 21,” J. Basicedu, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2024, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v8i1.6842.

M. Claramita, H. Nurokhmanti, N. Qomariyah, V. I. Budiastuti, P. S. Utomo, and A. Findyartini, “Facilitating Student-Centered Learning: In the Context of Social Hierarchies and Collectivistic Culture. In Challenges and Opportunities in Health Professions Education: Perspectives in the Context of Cultural Diversity,” Singapore Springer Nat. Singapore, pp. 17–43, 2022.

J. Mirdad, “Model-Model Pembelajaran ( Empat Rumpun Model Pembelajaran ),” (Indonesia J. Sakinah) J. Pendidik. dan Sos. Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2020.

O. Amtu, K. Makulua, J. Matital, and C. M. Pattiruhu, “Improving Student Learning Outcomes Through School Culture, Work Motivation and Teacher Performance.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 885–902, 2020.

A. Namoun and A. Alshanqiti, “Predicting Student Performance Using Data Mining and Learning Analytics Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review.,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 237, 2020.

A. M. Al Kandari and M. M. Al Qattan, “E-task-Based Learning Approach to Enhancing 21st-Century Learning Outcomes.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 551–566, 2020.

A. Suryadi, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Materi Minyak Bumi di Kelas X MIA-3 Semester I SMAN 1 Sanggar Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 44–55, 2022, doi: 10.53299/jppi.v2i1.168.

C. Martinez, “Developing 21st Century Teaching Skills: A Case Study of Teaching and Learning Through Project-Based Curriculum.,” Cogent Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022.

I. Engeness, “Developing Teachers’ Digital Identity: Towards The Pedagogic Design Principles Of Digital Environments to Enhance Students’ Learning In The 21st Century,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 96–114, 2021.

E. C. Sitio, Maison, D. A. Kurniawan, and W. Kalpatari, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Dan Korelasinya Dengan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Materi Fluida Statis Kelas XI MIPA 4 SMAN 2 Muara Bungo,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Riset dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2021, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 195–212, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.usahidsolo.ac.id/index.php/SENRIABDI.

D. D. Saputra, M. Tahir, and I. Ermiana, “Pengaruh Metode Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Peserta Didik Kelas V Di Sdn 12 Ampenan Tahun Ajaran 2021,” J. Ilm. Pendas Prim. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.29303/pendas.v3i1.84.

P. D. Leedy and J. E. Ormrod, Practical Research: Planning and Design. Boston: Pearson, 2015.

A. R. F. Gani and Sabani, “Analisis Kebutuhan Penilaian Berbasis Literasi Teknologi pada Materi Fluida,” J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 276–281, 2024.

A. Hani, I. Ermiana, and A. Fauzi, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contekstual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Berbantuan Video Animasi Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Peserta Didik,” J. Classr. Action Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 433–441, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jcar/index___________.

S. Farshi, A. K. Jaelani, and M. Erfan, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe GI Dengan Bantuan Mind Mapping Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa,” J. Classr. Action Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 537–544, 2024.

V. A. V Adelia and A. Heryanto, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Alam Sekitar Sebagai Media Pembelajaran IPA Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V SDN 68 Palembang,” Eskul J. Pengajaran dan Pengemb. Sek., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2024.

D. K. Wardani, Pengujian Hipotesis (deskriptif, komparatif dan asosiatif). Lppm Universitas Kh. A. Wahab Hasbullah, 2020.

M. A. Zakariah and V. Afriani, Analisis statistik dengan spss untuk penelitian kuantitatif. Yayasan Pondok Pesantren Al Mawaddah Warrahmah Kolaka, 2021.

S. Naharin, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Learnig) Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika kelas II di MI Baitul Mukminin Jati Kudus Tahun Pelajaran 2023,” IAIN KUDUS, 2023.

E. Harefa et al., Buku Ajar Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2024.

Suyono and Hariyanto, Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Konsep Dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

Winaputra, Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, 2007.

G. Mustofa, “Teori Contiguity Edwin Ray Guthrie (Teori Belajar Aliran Behavioristik Contiguous Conditioning Dan Penerapannya Dalam Pembelajaran Pai Di Sekolah),” J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 49–66, 2022.

S. H. Nisa’i, H. Syofyan, U. Hotimah, and R. Nurhayati, “Penggunaan Metode Ceramah dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Kelas Rendah dan Tinggi,” Pros. Esa Unggul, no. 9, pp. 258–261, 2022.

O. R. Ramadhani, V. Rahmawati, and A. Setyawan, “Pengaruh Kejenuhan Terhadap Konsentrasi Belajar dan Cara Mengatasinya pada Peserta Didik di SDN 1 Pandan,” J. PANCAR Pendidik Anak Cerdas dan Pint., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 242–250, 2022.

N. Cholifah, “Penerapan Media Virus (Visual Rumus) Pada Materi Lingkaran Untuk Meningkatan Hasil Belajar Kelas VI SDN Opo Opo Kec. Krejengan Kab. Probolinggo,” EduStream J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 2022, doi: 10.26740/eds.v4n2.p139-149.

Y. Vari, “Pemanfaatan Augmented Reality Untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Abad 21 Di Pembelajaran IPA,” J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 70–75, 2021.

E. T. Wahyuni, T. Mayasari, and E. Kurniadi, “Penerapan Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Penggunaan Media Flipbook untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa,” in Prosiding Konferensi Berbahasa Indonesia Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, 2023, pp. 437–445, doi: 10.30998/kibar.27-10-2022.6341.

W. Widia, S. Syahrir, and F. Sarnita, “Berpikir Kreatif Merupakan Bagian Terpenting dalam Meningkatkan Life Skills di Era Industri 4.0,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Pengetah. Alam, vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.56842/jp-ipa.v1i02.6.

L. Rosvadiana, F. A. Fadhilah, R. A. A. Faisal, and A. Suryanda, “Peranan Pembelajaran Jigsaw dalam Membangun Kemampuan Abad 21 Peserta didik,” J. Pendidik., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2023, doi: 10.52850/jpn.v24i1.8119.

R. Fitriah and N. Mardiati, “Pengaruh Faktor Sosiodemografi Terhadap Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Pada Penggunaan Antibiotik Di Kalangan Masyarakat Pedesaan : Studi Observasional Di Kecamatan Cempaka Banjarbaru The Influence Of Sociodemographic Factors On Knowledge And Attitudes About The U,” J. Farm. Sains dan Prakt., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 34–43, 2021.

A. Musliman and F. Damayanti, “Tinjauan Kritis Pembelajaran Kontekstual: Analisis terhadap Riset-Riset Pembelajaran IPA,” SCIENING Sci. Learn. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2024.

A. D. Pebrianti and N. Sutarna, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Pada Mata Pelajaran IPAS Kelas IV SDN 1 Karoya The,” Cendikiawan, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 200–206, 2024, doi: 10.35438/cendekiawan.v6i2.485.

I. Armana, I. Lasmawan, and I. Sriartha, “Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif,” J. Pendidik. IPS Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 63–71, 2020, doi: 10.23887/pips.v4i2.3380.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jime.v11i1.7935