Comparative Study Between Digital and Conventional Based Learning on Student Learning Outcomes at STKIP Hermon Timika

Authors

  • Maria Letisia Lipat Tupen Dosen STKIP Hermon Timika, Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v11i2.8618

Keywords:

Pembelajaran Digital, Pembelajaran Konvensional, Hasil Belajar

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology (ICT) has brought significant changes to the field of education, including higher education. The shift from conventional learning methods to digital-based learning has become an inevitable global trend. Conventional methods still offer advantages in terms of direct interaction between lecturers and students, but they are increasingly facing challenges related to flexibility and accessibility. On the other hand, digital learning methods provide easier access, greater flexibility, and improved efficiency, yet they also encounter obstacles such as limited face-to-face interaction and inadequate infrastructure—particularly in remote areas.This study is a comparative analysis aimed at examining the differences in student learning outcomes between digital-based learning and conventional learning. A descriptive comparative method with a quantitative approach was employed to collect data from two groups of students, each consisting of 25 participants, who engaged in learning through both digital and conventional methods. The data collected included demographic information, learning outcomes, as well as students’ perceptions and satisfaction levels with both approaches. The data were analyzed statistically.The findings indicate that digital-based learning is significantly more effective in improving learning outcomes compared to conventional methods. Students who participated in digital learning achieved higher average final exam scores. However, there were variations in student perceptions and satisfaction levels between the two methods, reflecting unique preferences and challenges associated with each approach.

References

M. (2017)., “Pembelajaran Digital.,” Bandung Alf., 2017.

U. (2023). Arifin, B., Handayani, E., Yunaspi, D., … R. E.-I. J. O., & 2023, “Transformasi Bahan Ajar Pendidikan Dasar Ke Arah Digital: Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar Di Era Teknologi Cybernetics. J-Innovative.Org, 3(5), 1–10.,” https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i5.4746, 2023.

N. W. S. D. (2022)., “Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Flipped Classroom Pada Era Digital Dengan Pemanfaatan Google Classroom.,” J. Pendidik. Dan Pembelajaran Bhs. Indones. 11(2), 168–177. https//doi.org/10.23887/jurnal_bahasa.v11i2.749, 2022.

K. (2011). Moore, M. G., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, “E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135.,” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001, 2011.

U. (2023). Syahirah, D., Qibtiah, M., Nurhalisa, I., Sastrawati, E., Gusmaulia Eka Putri, A., & Jambi, “Hambatan Penggunaan E-Learning Bagi Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Jambi.,” J. Sinestesia (Vol. 13, Issue 2). https//sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/475, 2023.

A. Santos-Meneses, L. F., Pashchenko, T., & Mikhailova, “Critical thinking in the context of adult learning through PBL and e-learning: A course framework.,” Think. Ski. Creat. 49. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101358, 2023.

& P. P. (2020). Parulian, H. M., “Tantangan Penerapan Sistem Belajar Online Bagi Mahasiswa Ditengah Pandemik Covid-19.,” J. Ekon. Dan Bisnis (EK&BI), 3(1), 277. https//doi.org/10.37600/ekbi.v3i1.130, 2020.

A. (2020). Hakim, L., & Mulyapradana, “Pengaruh penggunaan media daring dan motivasi belajar terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa pada saat pandemi Covid-19.,” Widya Cipta J. Sekr. dan Manajemen, 4(2), 154-160, 2020.

(2024) Cndroningtyas dan Marsofiyat, “Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Digital Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa.,” J. Cendikia Pendidikan, 10(3), 1-11. https//ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/sindorocendikiapendidikan/article/view/8935/7920, 2024.

A. (2023) Azkia, N.F., Muin, A., dan Dimyati, “Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Digital Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika: Meta Analisis.,” J. Pembelajaran Mat. Inov. 6(5), 1873-1886. https//journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/jpmi/article/view/18629/5937, 2023.

S. (2022). Darmawati, “Model Pembelajaran Konvensional dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa.,” J. Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(3), 112–119., 2022.

Z. C. Ortiz-Garcia, W. R., & Navarrete-Villarraga, “Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to Analyze the Scope of CLIL Classes with Children. HOW, 31(1).,” https://doi.org/10.19183/how.31.1.788, 2024.

D. & M. (2009)., “Belajar dan Pembelajaran.,” Jakarta: Rineka Cipta., 2009.

E. (2023). Maiteh, S. M., & Szeréna Zoltán, “Descriptive comparative analysis of post-disaster settlements.,” 2023.

M. W. (2021). Wardhani, S. L., & Kusuma, “Pengaruh Personal Attitude dan E-learning terhadap Minat Berwirausaha pada Era Pandemi Covid-19.,” J. Maksipreneur Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrep. 11(1), 90. https//doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v11i1.782, 2021.

M. S. (2023). Ardiansyah, Risnita, & Jailani, “Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan Pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif.,” J. IHSAN J. Pendidik. Islam. 1(2), 1–9. https//doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57, 2023.

R. R. (1999). Hake, “Analyzing Change/Gain Scores.,” Educ. Res. 28(1), 12-19., 1999.

T. (2008). Anderson, “The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed.).,” AU Press, 2018.

R. (2012)., “Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru.,” Jakarta: Rajawali Pers., 2012.

C. R. (2013). Graham, “Emerging practice and research in blended learning.,” M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handb. Distance Educ. (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge., 2013.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30