Evaluation of the Quality of Learning Outcomes Reviewed from the Learning Motivation of Students in the Specialization Development Education for Women and Children Criminal Investigators at the National Police Education and Training Center (Lemdiklat Polri)

Authors

  • Adi Wulandari Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta Indonesia
  • Irfan Abraham Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i3.9403

Keywords:

Learning Quality, Learning Motivation, Specialization Education, Investigators, Research Training

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of learning motivation on the quality of learning outcomes in the Specialization Development Education Program for Women and Children Criminal Investigators at the National Police Education and Training Center. Using a qualitative approach with observation techniques, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies, this study found that learning motivation has a significant influence on participants' success in absorbing training materials. The main findings indicate that intrinsic motivation—such as a sense of responsibility, concern for victims, and commitment to duty—is the dominant factor that drives active participant involvement. On the other hand, extrinsic motivation such as institutional incentives and support from superiors act as a booster for learning enthusiasm. A conducive learning environment, contextual teaching methods such as case studies and simulations, and support from instructors and colleagues also strengthen the effect of motivation on learning outcomes. This study confirms the relevance of the Self-Determination theory, learning ecology, and social learning in the context of police education. The results of this study contribute to the design of curriculum, instructor training, and institutional policies that are oriented towards improving the quality of training for police investigators, especially in handling cases of violence against women and children.

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Kusumawardani, L., & Sutisna, S. (2019). Pengaruh motivasi intrinsik terhadap komitmen dan prestasi kerja ASN pasca pelatihan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan, 10(2), 115–124.

Lestari, R. (2021). Pengaruh model problem-based learning terhadap kompetensi investigatif peserta pelatihan penyidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 5(1), 21–35.

Nurhadi, R., & Ramadhan, D. (2022). Interaksi edukatif pelatih-peserta dalam pelatihan aparatur negara. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pelatihan, 14(2), 45–58.

Prasetyo, D., & Astuti, S. (2020). Pembelajaran kolaboratif dalam pendidikan profesional: Pengaruh terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dan penguatan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi, 8(3), 133–144.

Supriyanto, A., & Gunawan, D. (2021). Pengaruh penghargaan karier terhadap semangat belajar anggota Polri. Jurnal Kepolisian dan Keamanan, 6(1), 67–76.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wibowo, H., Setyawan, R., & Pratiwi, A. (2020). Pengaruh lingkungan fisik dan sosial terhadap keberhasilan pelatihan teknis di institusi kepolisian. Jurnal Pengembangan SDM, 9(4), 201–215.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-09-13

Issue

Vol 10, No 3 (2025): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (September)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.

How to Cite

Evaluation of the Quality of Learning Outcomes Reviewed from the Learning Motivation of Students in the Specialization Development Education for Women and Children Criminal Investigators at the National Police Education and Training Center (Lemdiklat Polri). (2025). JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 10(3), 1172-1182. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i3.9403