Debaters’ Critical Thinking Skills In Reading Text

Authors

  • Edi Firman FBMB, Mandalika University of Education,Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i2.5275

Keywords:

Key Words, Debaters, Critical Thinking, Reading Text

Abstract

This research aimed at finding out the measurement of the level of E2DC debater’s critical thinking skill in reading newspaper and the strategy that used. There were many important things as debaters that were: make argumentation well, practice critical thinking and good public speaking as native speaker. Not only that but also you will have confidently in the classroom when you presentation and felt easier than other students. In providing evidence the debater should have good background of knowledge because that was the way to increase debaters’ critical thinking. The members of this community were trained to becoming debaters and being able to make an argumentation well and have critical thinking skills with kind of issue. The researcher identified several problems in Debaters’ critical thinking skills. In other words, a debater must have critical skills to understand the main idea from the text and can make inference by their own words. Not only that but also, they must be able to make it different between the fact, opinion and non-fact. The result of observation section. First debater was Excellent as the OG (Opening Government), the second debater was Average as the OO (Opening opposition), the third debater was Good as the CG (Closing Government) and the last or the fourth debater was Below Average as the CO (Closing Opposition). From all the percentage shows that, the percentage of using Cognitive Domain in reading skills from the four debaters is higher than Incorporating Critical Thinking. 

References

Brown, H. D. (2004). Langguage assessment principal and class room practices.London: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

B Utami et al (2019). empowering critical thinking skills with problem solving in higher education. Surakarta. Journal of Physics

Chesla Elizabeth. (2000) read better, remember more. New york: Learning Express, LLC.

Creswell John W. (2009) Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and MixedStrategys Approaches. California: Sage Publication. Inc.

Elder Richard & Elder Linda. (2004). Critical thinking Tools for Taking Charge Of Your Professional and Personal Life. United state: person edition,inc.

Facione P. (2015). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts.Measured Reasons LLC. Insight Assessement

Garry Wolley. 2011. Reading comprehention: assisting children in learningDifficulties. Griffith university.

Kallet Michael. (2004). Think smarter Critical thinking to improve problem-Solving and Decision-Making Skills. Canada: john wiley&sons,inc.,

Miculecky, Beatrice. S. (1996).Reading power, reading faster, thinking skills,Reading for pleasure and comprehension skill. New York: BostonUniversity.

Rinela Elsa P et al (2018) The analyzing of critical thinking skills on students of high schoolgrade X in plaju and seberangulu II district. Palembang. Jurnal Pena Sains

SyavenyNiza. (2017) teaching reading comprehension by using directed Activities related to text (drta) for the student. Jurnal kata

Wallance James M. (2011). Critical thinking A Student’s Introduction. New York:McGraw-Hill.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-02

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Juni)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.