Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a Screening Instrument for Postpartum Depression: A Literature Review.

Authors

  • Eprel Pranacinsa Tanagan Medical Education Study Program, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Mataram
  • Cut Warnaini Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Mataram
  • Agustine Mahardika Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/rmjv7949

Abstract

Background: Postpartum depression, a mental health problem that can affect maternal health and functioning, the mother–infant relationship, and family well-being. Screening is important to identify women who require further evaluation. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is one of the most widely used instruments for screening perinatal depression. Objective: This review aimed to examine the use of the EPDS as a screening instrument for postpartum depression, including its characteristics, score interpretation, psychometric evidence for the Indonesian version, advantages, limitations, and application in healthcare settings. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using literature addressing postpartum depression, the EPDS, screening accuracy, cut-off values, psychometric properties, adaptation of the Indonesian EPDS, and its application in healthcare settings. Results: The EPDS is a brief and practical 10-items instrument with good performance. Studies in Indonesia have demonstrated psychometric properties supporting the use of the Indonesian EPDS. However, its performance may vary according to the selected cut-off and population characteristics. The EPDS is not a diagnostic instrument; therefore, positive screening results require clinical evaluation, safety assessment, and appropriate follow-up. Conclusion: The EPDS can be recommended as a screening instrument to support the early identification of postpartum depression, including in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia.
Abstract Views 45PDF Downloads 16

References

[1] American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2022. doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787.

[2] American College of Obstetric and Gynecologists, Screening and diagnosis of mental health conditions during pregnancy and postpartum: Clinical Practice Guideline No. 4. Washington DC, 2023.

[3] Y. Bai et al., “Review Article Prevalence of Postpartum Depression Based on Diagnostic Interviews: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” vol. 2023, no. Cdc, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/8403222.

[4] K. Al-abri, D. Edge, and C. J. Armitage, “Prevalence and correlates of perinatal depression,” Nov. 01, 2023, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02386-9.

[5] S. S. Sainuddin, N. M. Noor, A. A. Kadir, and R. Zakaria, “Systematic / Narrative Review Article A 10-year systematic review and meta-analysis of determinants of postpartum depression in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries,” vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 675–686, 2023.

[6] C. Gastaldon, M. Solmi, C. U. Correll, C. Barbui, and G. Schoretsanitis, “analyses of observational studies Risk factors of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms: umbrella review of current evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies,” pp. 591–602, 2022, doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.222.

[7] S.-H. Park and J.-I. Kim, “Predictive validity of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale and other tools for screening depression in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., vol. 307, no. 5, pp. 1331–1345, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06525-0.

[8] M. Xu, Y. Luo, Y. Huang, and Y. Liu, “Risk factors for postpartum depression: an umbrella review,” no. January, 2026, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1714668.

[9] J. L. Cox, J. M. Holden, and R. Sagovsky, “Detection of Postnatal Depression,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 782–786, Jun. 1987, doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.

[10] I. S. Hutauruk, “Indonesian Version of The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation,” vol. 25, p. 16424, 2011.

[11] A. D. Paramita, A. T. Faradiba, and P. Febrayosi, “Psychometric Evaluation of the Indonesian Version Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale:,” pp. 410–414, 2020, doi: 10.5220/0008590204100414.

[12] D. N. Sari, H. Diatri, K. Siregar, and H. Pratomo, “Adaptation of The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in The Indonesian Version: Self-Reported Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Pregnant Women,” Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 1654–1659, 2021, doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.7783.

[13] A. Syam, M. Qasim, E. Kadrianti, and A. Kadir, “Factor Structure pf The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Indonesian Version” Medicina Clínica Práctica, vol. 4, p. 100238, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.mcpsp.2021.100238.

[14] M.-M. Z. Kjeldsen, A. Bricca, X. Liu, V. G. Frokjaer, K. B. Madsen, and T. Munk-Olsen, “Family History of Psychiatric Disorders as a Risk Factor for Maternal Postpartum Depression A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 1004–1013, 2022.

[15] United States Preventive Services and Task Force, “Interventions to Prevent Perinatal Depression,” 2019.

[16] B. Levis, Z. Negeri, Y. Sun, A. Benedetti, and B. D. Thombs, “Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data,” The BMJ, vol. 371, 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4022.

[17] P. Sultan et al., “Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Maternal Postpartum Depression Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline A Systematic Review,” pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14885.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-05

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Research of Service Administration Health and Sains Healthys (September)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Research of Service Administration Health and Sains Healthys agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

How to Cite

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a Screening Instrument for Postpartum Depression: A Literature Review. (2026). Research of Service Administration Health and Sains Healthys, 7(3), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.58258/rmjv7949