Pathomechanisms and Neuroprotective Strategies in Traumatic Brain Injury

Authors

  • Mufidah Radwah Ja'faruddin Universitas Mataram
  • Anis Wulan Prabajati Universitas Mataram
  • Ni Luh Putu Faniacetta Dahayu Wedantari Universitas Mataram
  • Nurussifa' Innuffus Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/wj4xqr67

Abstract

Cedera otak traumatik (traumatic brain injury/TBI) merupakan penyebab penting kematian dan disabilitas neurologis akibat cedera primer serta kaskade cedera sekunder yang melibatkan eksitotoksisitas, disfungsi mitokondria, neuroinflamasi, gangguan blood–brain barrier (BBB), edema, degenerasi akson, dan kematian sel. Tinjauan ini membahas patomekanisme cedera primer dan sekunder, mekanisme neuroprotektif endogen, strategi terapi neuroprotektif, serta peran biomarker pada TBI. Tinjauan naratif ini disusun melalui sintesis literatur ilmiah mengenai TBI, neuroproteksi, biomarker, dan terapi inovatif, terutama publikasi tahun 2016–2026. Cedera sekunder merupakan proses multifaktorial yang saling berhubungan; eksitotoksisitas glutamat memicu influx Ca²⁺, disfungsi mitokondria, produksi reactive oxygen species (ROS), dan apoptosis, sedangkan neuroinflamasi, gangguan BBB, edema, serta degenerasi akson memperburuk kerusakan neurologis. Strategi neuroprotektif meliputi modulasi eksitotoksisitas, perlindungan antioksidan dan mitokondria, modulasi inflamasi, faktor neurotrofik, terapi sel punca, dan vesikel ekstraseluler. GFAP dan UCH-L1 berpotensi mendeteksi cedera intrakranial akut, sedangkan NF-L mencerminkan cedera aksonal persisten. Neuroproteksi TBI memerlukan pendekatan multipel target berbasis waktu, heterogenitas pasien, dan profil biomarker. 
Abstract Views 2PDF Downloads 0

References

[1] H. Zhong, Y. Feng, J. Shen, T. Rao, H. Dai, W. Zhong, and G. Zhao, “Global burden of traumatic brain injury in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 754–763, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.001.

[2] J. Ginsburg and T. Smith, “Traumatic brain injury,” in StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL, USA: StatPearls Publishing, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557861/

[3] M. H. Ali, R. Rohadi, L. M. Prihatina, and Z. Haikal, “Hubungan antara perbedaan beban trauma dengan gambaran histopatologi inflamasi otak tikus pasca mengalami cedera otak traumatik,” Jurnal Sains Teknologi & Lingkungan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 194–205, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jstl.v9i1.430.

[4] S. Y. Ng and A. Y. W. Lee, “Traumatic brain injuries: Pathophysiology and potential therapeutic targets,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 528, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00528.

[5] Y. Gu, J. Chen, T. Wang, C. Zhou, Z. Liu, and L. Ma, “Hsp70 inducer, 17-allylamino-demethoxygeldanamycin, provides neuroprotection via anti-inflammatory effects in a rat model of traumatic brain injury,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 3767–3772, 2016, doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3821.

[6] M. Wurzelmann, J. Romeika, and D. Sun, “Therapeutic potential of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and small molecular mimetics of BDNF for traumatic brain injury,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2017, doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.198964.

[7] D. F. Muresanu, C. B. Barle, I. Muresanu, C. Costin, J. Vester, A. Rafila, O. V. Rosu, and D. Slavoaca, “Neuroprotection in TBI,” in Neuroprotection, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 333–346, doi: 10.1093/med/9780190279431.003.0027.

[8] M. L. Pearn, I. R. Niesman, J. Egawa, A. Sawada, A. Almenar-Queralt, S. B. Shah, J. L. Duckworth, and B. P. Head, “Pathophysiology associated with traumatic brain injury: Current treatments and potential novel therapeutics,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 571–585, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10571-016-0400-1.

[9] F. Li, X. Wang, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and P. Gao, “Dexmedetomidine attenuates neuroinflammatory-induced apoptosis after traumatic brain injury via Nrf2 signaling pathway,” Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, vol. 6, pp. 1825–1835, 2019, doi: 10.1002/acn3.50878.

[10] A. Cash and M. H. Theus, “Mechanisms of blood–brain barrier dysfunction in traumatic brain injury,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 3344, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijms21093344.

[11] S. S. Gopal, P. Kaur, P. M. A. Muneer, and J. Haorah, “The breakdown of neurovascular barriers: Molecular mechanisms of tight junction dysfunction,” Molecular Neurobiology, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-05592-z.

[12] P. M. Abdul-Muneer, N. Chandra, and J. Haorah, “Role of matrix metalloproteinases in the pathogenesis of traumatic brain injury,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 6106–6123, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9520-8.

[13] R. M. Jha, P. M. Kochanek, and J. M. Simard, “Pathophysiology and treatment of cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 145, pt. B, pp. 230–246, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.08.004.

[14] W. Czyżewski, J. Litak, B. Kulesza, P. Szmygin, G. Bartosz, A. Chałas, W. A. Turski, and R. Tarkowski, “Aquaporins: Gatekeepers of fluid dynamics in traumatic brain injury,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 25, no. 12, p. 6553, 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25126553.

[15] A. Xiong, R. Xiong, J. Yu, Y. Liu, K. Liu, G. Jin, J. Xu, and J. Yan, “Aquaporin-4 is a potential drug target for traumatic brain injury via aggravating the severity of brain edema,” Burns & Trauma, vol. 9, p. tkaa050, 2021, doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa050.

[16] J. D. Arena, D. H. Smith, R. Diaz-Arrastia, D. K. Cullen, R. Xiao, J. Fan, D. C. Harris, C. E. Lynch, and V. E. Johnson, “The neuropathological basis of elevated serum neurofilament light following experimental concussion,” Acta Neuropathologica Communications, vol. 12, p. 189, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40478-024-01883-z.

[17] J. Tuure, M. Mohammadian, O. Tenovuo, K. Blennow, I. Hossain, P. Hutchinson, H. R. Maanpää, D. K. Menon, V. F. Newcombe, R. S. K. Takala, J. Tallus, M. van Gils, H. Zetterberg, and J. P. Posti, “Late blood levels of neurofilament light correlate with outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 41, nos. 3–4, pp. 359–368, 2024, doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0207.

[18] L. Zhan, L. Liu, K. Li, B. Wu, D. Liu, D. Liang, H. Wen, Y. Wang, W. Sun, W. Liao, and E. Xu, “Neuroprotection of hypoxic postconditioning against global cerebral ischemia through influencing posttranslational regulations of heat shock protein 27 in adult rats,” Brain Pathology, 2016, doi: 10.1111/bpa.12472.

[19] E. Atkinson and R. Dickman, “Growth factors and their peptide mimetics for treatment of traumatic brain injury,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 90, p. 117368, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2023.117368.

[20] C. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, D. Smerin, L. Gu, S. Jiang, and X. Xiong, “Triolein alleviates ischemic stroke brain injury by regulating autophagy and inflammation through the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 30, p. 242, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s10020-024-00995-5.

[21] V. Zotey, A. Andhale, T. Shegekar, and A. Juganavar, “Adaptive neuroplasticity in brain injury recovery: Strategies and insights,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 9, p. e45873, 2023, doi: 10.7759/cureus.45873.

[22] Y. Xiong, A. Mahmood, and M. Chopp, “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as a cell-free therapy for traumatic brain injury via neuroprotection and neurorestoration,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2024, doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.374143.

[23] L. Zhong, J. Wang, P. Wang, X. Liu, P. Liu, X. Cheng, and L. Zhou, “Neural stem cell-derived exosomes and regeneration: Cell-free therapeutic strategies for traumatic brain injury,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 198, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03409-1.

[24] I. Hossain, N. Marklund, E. Czeiter, P. Hutchinson, and A. Büki, “Blood biomarkers for traumatic brain injury: A narrative review of current evidence,” Brain & Spine, vol. 4, p. 102735, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102735.

[25] L. Papa, W. I. McKinley, A. B. Valadka, Z. C. Newman, R. K. Nordgren, P. E. Pramuka, C. E. Barbosa, A. M. P. Brito, L. J. Loss, L. Tinoco-Garcia, H. E. Hinson, M. A. Schreiber, and S. E. Rowell, “Diagnostic performance of GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2 within 30 and 60 minutes of traumatic brain injury,” JAMA Network Open, vol. 7, no. 9, p. e2431115, 2024, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31115.

[26] G. Spaziani, G. Rozzi, S. Baroni, G. Napoli, G. De Ninno, D. Della Polla, N. Bonadia, G. De Matteis, A. Piccioni, G. M. Della Pepa, A. Urbani, A. Gasbarrini, F. Franceschi, and M. Covino, “Prognostic value of GFAP and UCHL-1 biomarkers in high-risk mild traumatic brain injury: A prospective longitudinal study of short- and long-term outcomes,” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 101, pp. 41–47, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.12.021.

[27] H. Zarei, S. Roshdi Dizaji, A. Toloui, M. Yousefifard, and A. Esmaeili, “Diagnostic and prognostic values of S100B versus neuron-specific enolase for traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e29, 2024, doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2222.

[28] A. Sierakowska, E. Niewiadomska, S. Łabuda, A. Bieniasiewicz, M. Roszak, and B. Łabuz-Roszak, “Neuron-specific enolase as a biomarker for selected neurological and psychiatric disorders—A systematic review of the literature,” Medicina, vol. 61, no. 10, p. 1831, 2025, doi: 10.3390/medicina61101831.

[29] A. Behforouz, X. Zhang, and M. Zhu, “Neuron-specific enolase: A potential biomarker in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes in pediatric traumatic brain injury,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 26, no. 12, p. 5596, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ijms26125596.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-21

How to Cite

Pathomechanisms and Neuroprotective Strategies in Traumatic Brain Injury. (2026). Research of Service Administration Health and Sains Healthys, 7(3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.58258/wj4xqr67