The Study of APIPA Model Concept Development through the Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Syahrir Syahrir; Awaluddin Tjalla; Dinny Devi Triana

doi:10.58258/jime.v10i3.7362

The Study of APIPA Model Concept Development through the Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Syahrir Syahrir, Awaluddin Tjalla, Dinny Devi Triana

Abstract

Improving the quality of teacher performance programs certainly requires the important role of teachers and school leaders. The role of teachers can be seen in the implementation of performance programs which require systematic and structured evaluation of performance programs. The results of the evaluation and monitoring of the implementation of the teacher performance program by school leaders are used as material for consideration in making decisions about the quality level of the teacher performance program. Making this decision is very difficult for a school leader in evaluating teacher performance programs. In this case, a modified program evaluation was developed by the CIPP model program evaluation with ALKIN model program evaluation. The research used Development Research (R&D) using 4D design (Define, Design, Development, Dissemination). The Define stage conducts a literature review regarding weaknesses in the CIPP and ALKIN model program evaluation syntax. The Design stage prepares the topology related to the main ideas of the program evaluation development syntax. The Development stage carries out operational definitions and indicators for each program evaluation syntax. The dissemination stage carries out an expert judgment or assessment of the experts who are analyzed using the analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to determine the consistency of the program evaluation development concept. The results using AHP are consistent with the concept of developing the APIPA model program evaluation which has the syntax Assessment, Planning, Implementation, Product, and Appreciation for evaluating teacher performance programs.

Keywords

Evaluation of the APIPA Model Program, Analytical Hierarchy Process.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alkin, M. C., & Christie, Christina, A. (2004). Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences. In New Directions for Evaluation (Issue 97).

Alkin, M., & Christie, C. (2012). An Evaluation Theory Tree. In Evaluation Roots. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157.n2

Alkin, M. C., & Patton, M. Q. (2020). The Birth and Adaptation of Evaluation Theories. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 16(35). https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i35.637

Alkin, M. C., & Stecher, B. (1983). Evaluation in context: Information use in elementary school decision making. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(83)90004-4

Alkin, & Woolley. (1969). A Model for Educational Evaluation. PLEDGE Conference, 8-11 Oktober Di San Dimas.

Carden, F., & Alkin, M. C. (2012). Evaluation Roots: An International Perspective. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17). https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v8i17.348

Christie, C. A., & Alkin, M. C. (2008). Evaluation theory tree re-examined. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.07.001

Davidson, E. J. (2006). Book Review: Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006287988

Evendi, E., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2021). Evaluation of Student Learning Outcomes in Problem-Based Learning: Study of Its Implementation and Reflection of Successful Factors. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1099

Lindarti, A., & Hasanudin, R. (2021). Evaluasi Program Permainan Tradisional (Cublak-Cublak Suweng) Menggunakan Model Alkin. ABNA: Journal of Islamic Early …, 2(1).

Matthews, J. M., & Hudson, A. M. (2001). Guidelines for evaluating parent training programs. Family Relations, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00077.x

Mertens, D. M. (2020). Research and evaluation in education and psychology : integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods / Donna M. Mertens, Gallaudet University. In Research and evaluation in education and psychology : integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods.

Montgomery, C., & Fernández-Cárdenas, J. M. (2018). Teaching STEM education through dialogue and transformative learning: global significance and local interactions in Mexico and the UK. In Journal of Education for Teaching (Vol. 44, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422606

Muñoz-Cantero, J. M., Espiñeira-Bellón, E., & Losada-Puente, L. (2017). El desempeño profesional del evaluador en instituciones de atención á la diversidad funcional. Dificultades y retos. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.23.1.3920

Onion, A. J. (2004). What use is maths to me? A report on the outcomes from student focus groups. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/23.4.189

Raj Acharya, B. (2017). Factors Affecting Difficulties in Learning Mathematics by Mathematics Learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11

Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The cipp model: Applications in language program evaluation. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.19.1360

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP Model for Program Evaluation. In: Evaluation Models. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol. 6. In Evaluation Models.

Syahrir, S., Supriyati, Y., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Evaluasi Dampak Program Pendidikan Jarak Jauh (PJJ) melalui model CIPP pada Kinerja Dosen aspek Pembelajaran pada Masa Pendemi Covid 19. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i1.1716

Taut, S. M., & Alkin, M. C. (2003). Program Staff Perceptions of Barriers to Evaluation Implementation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400205

Tseng, K. H., Ray Diez, C., Lou, S. J., Tsai, H. L., & Tsai, T. S. (2010). Using the context, input, process and product model to assess an engineering curriculum. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(3).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jime.v10i3.7362