Analysis Of Students’ Difficulties In Writing Scientific Works At The Faculty Of Culture, Management
Abstract
In general, students who are compiling their thesis often experience difficulties. The difficulties encountered are very diverse, ranging from a lack of understanding of the problem to be studied, limited references, lack of mastery of theory, not having the desire to start writing, being busy working, and so on. This study aims to analyze the difficulties of seventh semester students in writing scientific papers. This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Subject This research is students of seventh semester (semester VII) or final year who are under thesis guidance. Data collection techniques in this study using a questionnaire. A difficulty questionnaire was administered to students who were writing their thesis. Data analysis techniques using percentage techniques are then described. The results of the research generally obtained information that students had difficulty in putting ideas into scientific writing, namely around 58.47%. The use of statistics in data processing is a percentage of 41.64%, and the telling of research results is a percentage of 54.17%. The results of the research are expected to be input, information and reference for all students of the Faculty of Culture, Management and Business of the Mandalika University of Education so that the difficulty factor for students in completing thesis can be overcome.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arifin, E. Zaenal. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Penulisan Karangan Ilmiah. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Dalman. (2010). Karya Ilmiah. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Didiharyono, & Qur’ani, B. (2019). Increasing Community Knowledge Through the Literacy Movement. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.35914/tomaega.v2i1.235
Finoza, Lamuddin. 2010. Komposisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Diksi Insan Mulia.
Huber, M. M., Leach-López, M. A., Lee, E., & Mafi, S. L. (2020). Improving accounting student writingskills using writing circles. Journal of Accounting Education, 53, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100694
Hadis, H. A. H. S., & Manvender, K. S. S. G. (2016). The effect of reading on improving the writing of EFL students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(4), 1115–1138.
Jujun S Sumantri. 2006. Ilmu dalam Perspektif: Sebuah Kumpulan Karangan tentang Hakikat Ilmu. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia
Kuswandari, A. H., Slamet, S. Y., & Setiawan, B. (2018). Kontribusi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Sebagai Konstruksi Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Esai. Gramatika STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2018.v4i1.2410
Moleong, L,. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noeng, M,. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi IV, Yogyakarta : Rake Sarasin
Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode peneitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suratman, Ilyas, & Mariamah. (2021). Kemampuan Menulis Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Melalui Penerapan Metode Drill. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v7i1.2301
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i2.5143
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Fathurrahman Imran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (p-issn: 2548-5555;e-issn:-) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.