Criteria For Good Test Questions (Analysis of Writing of Islamic Junior High School Exam Questions for Arabic Language Subjects at the Ta'mirul Islam Islamic Boarding School)

Luthfiyyah Nur Afifah

Abstract


The aim of this research was to analyze the odd exam question in Arabic subject to the ninth-grade students at Boarding School of Ta’mirul Islam Surakarta in academic year 2020/2021 which include the validity, power of difficulty, discrimination power, and answer patterns. This method used in the research was a descriptive quantitative method. The result of the analysis showed that the quality which was seen from the 1) validity there were 11 or 27,5% questions which were valid and the rest were 29 or 72,5% of questions were invalid. 2) from the level of difficulty, there were 4 or 10% of questions which average level of difficulty, and there were 32 or 90% of questions which had difficult and easy level. 3) From the discrimination power there were 10 or 25% of questions which had good discriminations and 30 or 75% of questions which had low and negative. 4) from the answer patterns, it is known that in general all distributor in the question were unfunctional properly


Keywords


Good questions criteria, Analysze exam question.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 1993. Manajemen Pengajaran. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta Arikunto, S. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi kedua. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara Arikunto, S. 2018. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta Bagiyono. 2017 Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Ujian Pelatihan

Radiografi Tingkat 1. Batan : Widyanuklida Vol 1.

Gene, Glass, & Stanley, Julian C, 1970. Statistical Methods in Education and Psichology.

New Jersey ; Prentice Hall, Inc.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Ghozali, Imam. 2009. Aplikas Analisis Multivariete dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : UNDIP.

Kadir, Abdul. 2015 Menyusun dan Menganalisis Tes : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Kendari.

Khaeruddin, Administrasi, Analisis, dan Kaidah Penulisan Tes ( Jurnal Madaniyah Vol 1 Edisi XII Januari 2017)

Koyan I Wayan. 2012. Kontruksi Tes. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Purwanto, M Ngalim, 1994 Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan.

Bandung:Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sudijono Anas, 2009. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Sudijono Anas. 2001. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Jakaarta.

Sudijono, S. 2006. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Tekan

Sudjana Nana. 2008. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung.

Sugianto, Aris. 2016. Ciri-Ciri (Karakteristik) Tes yang Baik. IAIN Palangkaraya. Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : ALFABETA Sukardi. 2011. Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta Timur : PT.

Bumi Aksara.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i3.5921

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Luthfiyyah Nur Afifah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (p-issn: 2548-5555;e-issn:-) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.