Criteria For Good Test Questions (Analysis of Writing of Islamic Junior High School Exam Questions for Arabic Language Subjects at the Ta'mirul Islam Islamic Boarding School)

Authors

  • Luthfiyyah Nur Afifah Pascasarjana UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i3.5921

Keywords:

Good questions criteria, Analysze exam question.

Abstract

The aim of this research was to analyze the odd exam question in Arabic subject to the ninth-grade students at Boarding School of Ta’mirul Islam Surakarta in academic year 2020/2021 which include the validity, power of difficulty, discrimination power, and answer patterns. This method used in the research was a descriptive quantitative method. The result of the analysis showed that the quality which was seen from the 1) validity there were 11 or 27,5% questions which were valid and the rest were 29 or 72,5% of questions were invalid. 2) from the level of difficulty, there were 4 or 10% of questions which average level of difficulty, and there were 32 or 90% of questions which had difficult and easy level. 3) From the discrimination power there were 10 or 25% of questions which had good discriminations and 30 or 75% of questions which had low and negative. 4) from the answer patterns, it is known that in general all distributor in the question were unfunctional properly

References

Arikunto, S. 1993. Manajemen Pengajaran. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta Arikunto, S. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi kedua. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara Arikunto, S. 2018. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta Bagiyono. 2017 Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Ujian Pelatihan

Radiografi Tingkat 1. Batan : Widyanuklida Vol 1.

Gene, Glass, & Stanley, Julian C, 1970. Statistical Methods in Education and Psichology.

New Jersey ; Prentice Hall, Inc.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Ghozali, Imam. 2009. Aplikas Analisis Multivariete dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : UNDIP.

Kadir, Abdul. 2015 Menyusun dan Menganalisis Tes : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Kendari.

Khaeruddin, Administrasi, Analisis, dan Kaidah Penulisan Tes ( Jurnal Madaniyah Vol 1 Edisi XII Januari 2017)

Koyan I Wayan. 2012. Kontruksi Tes. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Purwanto, M Ngalim, 1994 Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan.

Bandung:Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sudijono Anas, 2009. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Sudijono Anas. 2001. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Jakaarta.

Sudijono, S. 2006. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Tekan

Sudjana Nana. 2008. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung.

Sugianto, Aris. 2016. Ciri-Ciri (Karakteristik) Tes yang Baik. IAIN Palangkaraya. Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : ALFABETA Sukardi. 2011. Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta Timur : PT.

Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-09

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2023): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (September)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.

How to Cite

Criteria For Good Test Questions (Analysis of Writing of Islamic Junior High School Exam Questions for Arabic Language Subjects at the Ta’mirul Islam Islamic Boarding School). (2023). JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 8(3), 895-901. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i3.5921