Evaluation of Students' Creative Thinking Ability in Solving Fraction Problems in Class V of Elementary School

Authors

  • Nurwalidainismawati Nurwalidainismawati1 STKIP Harapan Bima, Bima Indonesia
  • Azra Fauzi STKIP Harapan Bima, Bima Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i4.6147

Keywords:

Pembelajaran Matematika, Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif, Evaluasi Pembelajaran

Abstract

Students with the ability to think creatively mathematically will receive more attention inside and outside the classroom, but the mathematics learning results obtained by students show unsatisfactory results, especially in solving problems. The objectives of this research are: 1) evaluating students' creative thinking abilities, 2) analyzing factors that inhibit students' creative thinking abilities. This research uses a qualitative type of research using the CIPP approach. The subject of this research was carried out in fifth grade elementary school with sub-subject material regarding fraction calculation operations. Data collection techniques use questionnaires, interviews and test questions. Data validation uses triangulation of sources and methods, with data analysis techniques using 4 research stages from Miles and Hubeman. The results are: 1) evaluation of creative thinking abilities on fluency indicators obtained as a percentage79.04%, flexibility obtained 64.44%, novelty obtained 63.33%, and detail 79.00%, these results show that students are creative in the learning process, not in problem solving activities in questions; 2) the causal factors are low understanding regarding the concept of multiplication calculation operations on fractions with different denominators, highshyness in conveying ideas, lack of practice and involvement in the learning process. In conclusion: the results of the KBK evaluation show that there is a tendency for learning activities to always focus on the teacher, students are more inclined to understand questions based on the example questions that are indicated, the concept of arithmetic operations is not mastered, understanding of the questions is lacking, and they tend to focus on obtaining learning outcomes rather than on the process learning.

References

Arifah, U., & Saefudin, A. A. (2017). Menumbuhkembangkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep

matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran guided discovery. Union: Jurnal

Pendidikan Matematik, 5(3), 263–272.

Ashari, W. A., Harun, L., & Supandi. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dengan

Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan

Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. 05(02), 99–107.

Bhakti, Y. B. (2017). Evaluasi program model CIPP pada proses pembelajaran IPA. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 1(2), 75-82.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Darwanto, D. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis:(Pengertian dan

Indikatornya). Eksponen, 9(2), 20-26.

Faelasofi, R. (2017). Identifikasi kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematika pokok bahasan peluang. JURNAL e-DuMath, 3(2).

Faturohman, I., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2020). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa melalui creative problem solving. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 107-118.

Fatwa, V. C., Septian, A., & Inayah, S. (2019). Kemampuan literasi matematis siswa melalui model pembelajaran problem based instruction. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 389-398.

Kamara, J. G., Simamora, R. E., & Rahayu, S. W. (2023). Eksplorasi faktor penghambat berpikir

kreatif matematis siswa menengah pertama. Mathematics Education And Application

Journal (META), 5(1), 18-30.

Kurniawati, N. (2018). Mengakses dan memonitor kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa kelas V sekolah dasar dalam pembelajaran matematika. Prisma, 7(1), 99-106.

Pratiwi, F. E., & Pangestika, R. R. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Mengerjakan Soal Materi Pecahan Di Kelas V SD Negeri Purworejo. Lencana: Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 223-228.

Saefudin, A. A. (2012). Pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik indonesia (PMRI). Al-Bidayah: jurnal pendidikan dasar Islam, 4(1).

Saputri, J. R., & Mampouw, H. L. (2018). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah dalam

menyelesaikan soal materi pecahan oleh siswa SMP ditinjau dari tahapan Polya. Math

Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 146-154.

Simamora, R. E., Darmayasa, J. B., & Kamara, J. G. (2022). Why is the mathematics educator called inspiring? Journal of Honai Math, 5(2), 147–168.

https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v5i2.334

Soraya, F., Yurniwati, U. C., & Cahyana, U. (2018). Penerapan Pendekatan Realistis Matematics Education (RME) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pokok Bahasan Pecahan Pada Siswa Kelas IV SDN Rawajati 06 Pagi. Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.

Sugilar, H. (2013). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Disposisi Matematika

Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah Melalui Pembelajaran Generatif. InfinityJurnal Ilmiah

Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, Vol 2, No.2.

Sugiyono, (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfa Beta

Widiastuti, Y., & Putri, R. I. I. (2018). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada pembelajaran operasi pecahan menggunakan pendekatan open-ended. Jurnal Pendidikan

Matematika, 12(2), 13-22.

Wulandari, A. (2018). Pembelajaran Pecahan Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah untuk Melatih Berpikir Kreatif Pada Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian, 4(1), 608-617.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-84.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Desember)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.