Improving the Students’ Reading Comprehension Using Rare (Review, Answer, Read, Express) At SMPN 2 Palibelo

Edi Firman

Abstract


This study aims to see whether the RARE strategy can improve students' reading comprehension at SMPN 2 Palibelo. This research is a class action research (CAR). The data obtained in the form of quantitative and qualitative methods. The instrument used by the researcher was in the form of a test (posttest) in the form of multiple choices. There are four steps to doing: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. This classroom action research was carried out in two cycles. The first cycle was conducted in two meetings and the second cycle in two meetings. The first cycle was carried out by providing material about the types of vehicles and their existence, in the first cycle there was no increase and it was continued in the second cycle, namely with lots and lots of material, and some several. The results of this study indicate that there is an increase in students' reading in cycle II. Researcher found a significant increase in cycle II, this can be seen from the average cycle of 46 for pre-test, 62.3 for post-test I and 83 for post-test II. So teaching using the RARE strategy shows students are active and enthusiastic in learning English. In addition to the explanation above, the RARE strategy also has several advantages, such as: easy to understand and easy to implement. From the explanation above, the use of the RARE strategy in the learning process of reading comprehension has a positive effect on student achievement, because students can learn easily and relaxed without any burden. I hope this RARE strategy helps more students to improve their reading comprehension.

Keywords


Rare (Review, Answer, Read, Express), CAR (Classroom Action Research)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrew, P. J. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Education.

Bogdan, R. C. (1992). Qualitative Research For Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Borg, W. &. (1993). Educational Research: An Introduction,. London: New York.

Borg, W. &. (1993). Educational Research: An Introduction,Fifth Edition. New York: Longman.

Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Cameron-Jone. (1983). A Searching profession? The Growth of Classroom. Scotland: Moray house College of Education.

Cohen, L. &. (1989). Research Methods in Education. Routledge. London : New York. Dr. Linda Reetz, University of South Dakota, Handbook for Sped 731

Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change, Buckingham, Open. New York: University Press.

Ferrance, E. (2000). ACTION RESEARCH. New York: Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory At Brown University.

Gasong. (2007). Metode Pembelajaran Scaffolding. Medan: Medan.

Kemmis, K. a. (2000). Participatory Action Research. New York: University Press. Kemmis, S. &. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press. Kemmis, W. C. (1982). Educational Action Rsearcher. Educational Action Rsearcher, 347.

Mikulecky, B. S. (1996). More Reading Power. New York: Addison-wesley Publishing Company.

Oxford. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. New York: Newbury House.

Pang S, E. M. (2003). International Academic of Education: Teaching Reading. Paris: Sadac Bellegarde.

Riyanto. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surabaya: SIC.

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica: CA: RAND Corporation.

Strickland. (1987). The Teacher as Researcher: Toward the Extended Professional. Toward the Extended Professional, 760.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta. Taggart, K. S. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deakin University.

Tarigan. (1998). Berbicara sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa. Tarigan, H. G. (1987). Techniques For Teaching Language Skill. London: New City.

Vacca, R. T. (1999). Content Area Reading. Longman: Longman.

Wenden, A. L. (1987). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i4.6189

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Edi Firman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (p-issn: 2548-5555;e-issn:-) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.