Development of Diagnostic Assessment of Critical Thinking Skills in Four-Level Format on Kinematics Material

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i4.6288

Keywords:

test assessment, critical thinking, four levels, validity, reliability

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop a four-level critical thinking skills assessment that is valid and reliable. The assessment was developed based on four factors of critical thinking skills, namely explanation, analysis, conclusion and evaluation. This research is classified as development research (R&D). The research sample was 52 students in class XI of Nahdlatul Ulama High School, Tegal City. Data analysis methods include: expert validation, construct validity, and assessment reliability. Expert validation by two lecturers and two physics teachers, construct validity test with factor analysis consisting of: One-Sample K-S Test, KMO MSA test, correlation between variables (Anti-Image Correlation), communality, and Total Variance Explained. The results of the expert test analysis obtained an average questionnaire score of 78.8% with high validity criteria. The results of the One-Sample K-S Test for critical thinking skills assessment were 0.261, so it was concluded that the data was normally distributed. The results of the adequacy test via the KMO MSA value are 0.000, so factor analysis can be carried out. The results of the Total Variance Explained analysis in the scree plot diagram obtained 4 points where the eigenvalue was greater than 1.00, so that 4 factors were obtained which proved that the assessment had 4 component aspects of critical thinking skills as assessment factors. The reliability test of the assessment obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient value of 0.693, so it was found that the diagnostic assessment of critical thinking skills developed was reliable. The assessment developed is not only able to describe students' critical thinking skills, but is also able to provide an overview of how each aspect of critical thinking skills supports each other. The assessment developed is suitable for use as an instrument to measure critical thinking skills and the relationship of each aspect of students' critical thinking skills to kinematics material.

Author Biography

  • Doni Setiawan, Politeknik Muhammadiyah Tegal
    Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Muhammadiyah Tegal

References

Agustiani, N., Setiani, A., & Lukman, H. S. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes PLSV Berdasarkan Indikator Berpikir Kritis dan Pemecahan Masalah. Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 107-119.

Ahmad, S., Prahmana, R. C. I., Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Arianil, Y., & Zainil, M. (2017, December). The instruments of higher order thinking skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 943, No. 1, p. 012053). IOP Publishing.

Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), 21-39.

Amalia, N. F., & Susilaningsih, E. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi asam basa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2).

Benyamin, B., Qohar, A., & Sulandra, I. M. (2021). Analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X sekolah menengah atas dalam SPLTV. Jurnal Cendekia, 5(1), 922-932.

Changwong, K. & Susan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill : Analysis of a learning prosses management for high schools. Journal of International Studies, 13(2).

de Bie, H. & van der Meij, H. (2015). critical thinking assessment: Toward a Dutch appraisal of critical thinking. Thinking skills and creativity, 17, 33-44.

Dharmawati, D., Rahayu, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Pengembangan asesmen keterampilan berpikir kritis untuk siswa SMP pada materi interaksi antar makhluk hidup. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(5), 1498-1507.

Ennis, Robert H. 2011. The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Artikel Sixth International Conference on Thinking. Illinois: University of Illinois

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight assessment, 1(1), 1-23.

Febriana, R. (2015). Validitas Konstruk Asesmen PASS (Procrastination Assessment Scale For Student) Metode CFA. Jurnal Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(4), 277-287.

Firdaus, F., Kailani, I., Bakar, M. N. B., & Bakry, B. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills of students in mathematics learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(3), 226-236.

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving Thinking Skills on Three Different Models of Learning. International Journal of instruction, 8(1), 116-124.

Hartanto, H., Marlina, L., & Wiyono, K. (2021). Pengembangan e-schoology materi gelombang untuk memperbaiki kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 213-221.

Haynes, A., Goltz, M., & Harris, K. (2016). Moving assessment to improving students’ critical thinking skills: A model for implementing. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 44-61.

Heard, J., Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Ramalingam, D., & Teo, I. (2020). Critical thinking: Skill development framework.

Heinrich, W. F., Johnson, H. L., & Goralnik, L. (2015). Critical thinking assessment across sustainability experiential learning .Journal of Experiential Education, 8(3), 363-383.

Hendriana, H., Putra, H. D., & Hidayat, W. (2019). How to design teaching materials to improve the ability of mathematical reflective thinking of senior high school students in Indonesia?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), 17-25.

Hulinggi, S. A., & Samaela, D. P. (2023). Pengembangan Asesmen Autentik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Jigsaw Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Kolaboratif Dan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi. Biosfer: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 56-66.

Khairani, S., Suyanti, R. D., & Saragi, D. (2020). The Influence of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model Collaborative and Learning Motivation Based on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability Science Subjects in Class V State Elementary School 105390 Island Image. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(3), 1581-1590.

Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of Bloom's taxonomy. Educationalpsychologist, 45(1), 64-65.

Liu, O. L., Shaw, A., Hu, S., & Loyalka, P. (2018). Assessing critical thinking: preliminary results from Critical Thinking assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 997-1014.

Marfu’i, L. N. R., Nurihsan, A. J., & Damaianti, V. S. (2018). Self-regulation in critical thinking skills of buddhist teenagers for solving problems in Indonesia. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 9(1), 101-113.

Mas’ula, N., & Rokhis, T. A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Kinematika. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 4(3)

Miftahussa’adiah, H. A., & Handayani, D. (2020). Development of Critical Thingking Assesment of Circulation System Material for Grade XI High School Students.

Muna, N. (2018). Pengembangan asesmen kinerja pada materi Protista untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X di MAN 1 Malang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang)

Nawawi, S., & Wijayanti, T. F. (2018). Pengembangan asesmen keterampilan berpikir kritis terintegrasi nilai Islam. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 126-138.

Putriadi, D. N. (2020). Pengembangan asesmen kinerja pada praktikum IPA berbasis pendekatan saintifik dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas VII SMP. Wahana Matematika Dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, Dan Pembelajarannya, 14(2), 125-143.

Rahayu, C., & Festiyed, F. (2019). Validitas perangkat pembelajaran fisika SMA berbasis model pembelajaran generatif dengan pendekatan open-ended problem untuk menstimulus keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 7(1), 1-6.

Shaw, A., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., & Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: validating the critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1923-1938.

Supriyatno, T., Susilawati, S., & Hassan, A. (2020). E-learning development in improving students' critical thinking ability. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1099-1106.

Syafitri, E., Armanto, D., & Rahmadani, E. (2021). Aksiologi kemampuan berpikir kritis (kajian tentang manfaat dari kemampuan berpikir kritis). Journal of Science and Social Research, 4(3), 320-325.

The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2015. P21 Framework Defenitions. United State of America: U. S. Department of Education.

Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019900176.

Wangsa, G. N. A. S., Dantes, N., & Suastra, I. W. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar IPA kelas V SD Gugus IV Kecamatan Gerokgak. PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 5(1), 139-150.

Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., F., L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?. Thinking skills and creativity, 2(8), 124-132

Downloads

Published

2023-12-11

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Desember)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.