Analysis of Factors Causing Initial Reading Difficulties of Grade I Students of SD Negeri 29 Sanggau

Authors

  • Jumilah Septiani Universitas Nahdlatu Ulama Kalimantan Barat
  • Yunika Afryaningsih Universitas Nahdlatu Ulama Kalimantan Barat
  • Muhammad Agmal Nurcahyo Universitas Nahdlatu Ulama Kalimantan Barat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i4.6469

Keywords:

causative factors, difficulty reading beginnings

Abstract

This study aims to describe the shape, shape and factors causing initial reading difficulties of grade I students of SDN 29 Sanggau. This research uses a qualitative approach with a type of descriptive research and the subject is a class teacher, a grade I student of SDN 29 Sanggau. Data collection is carried out by interviews, observations and egra tests. Data analysis techniques use the Miles and Huberman model, namely data reduction, data display and data verification. The results of the observation and EGRA test of initial reading difficulties of grade I students of SDN 29 Sanggau, researchers concluded that of the 5 difficulties in the initial reading aspect, namely the aspect of recognizing letters from 2 aspects, namely the aspect of recognizing capital letters, 5 students could not mention capital letters. 4 students are not familiar with letters much and it is difficult to distinguish almost the same letters. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 71.4 and the percentage is 36%. Aspects of recognizing lowercase letters 4 students have not been able to pronounce lowercase letters. 4 students are not familiar with letters much and it is difficult to distinguish letters that are almost the same, namely. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 74.36 and the percentage is 32%. The aspect of reading words from 3 aspects, namely the aspect of identifying letters 9, students cannot identify letters. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 80.5 and the percentage is 36%. The aspect of stringing words is 15 students have not been able to string together words. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 66.1 and the percentage is 56%. Aspect of identifying words 5 students cannot identify words yet and need teacher help. 4 students said the wrong word.  6 students remove letters and change words with similar ones. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 67.2 and the percentage is 60%.  The aspect of reading words that have no meaning from 3 aspects, namely the aspect of identifying letters 9, students cannot identify letters. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 80.5 and the percentage is 36%. Aspect of stringing the arrangement Aspect of word fluency 3 students are not fluent in stringing words. 2 students have not yet assembled the arrangement of the letters ng. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 62.5 and the percentage is 60%.  Aspect of identifying the word 5 students pronounce the wrong word. 2 students omit letters and 2 students change words with similar ones. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 63.9 and the percentage is 60%.  Aspects of fluency in reading aloud and reading comprehension from 5 aspects, namely the aspect of identifying letters 9 students have not been able to identify letters. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 80.5 and the percentage is 36%. Aspect of stringing word arrangement 7 students cannot string together words and still need teacher help. 3 students stammered in stringing together the wording. 3 students are not fluent in stringing words. 2 students have not yet assembled the arrangement of the letters ng and ny. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 60.89 and the percentage is 60%. Aspect of identifying words 7 students cannot identify words yet and need teacher help. 5 students pronounce the word incorrectly. 2 students omit letters and 2 students change words with similar ones. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 62.31 and the percentage is 60%. The reading fluency aspect of 3 students is not fluent in reading and needs teacher help. 12 students read with spelling, too long and faltering. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 62.01 and the percentage is 60%.  The aspect of the ability to answer questions about the content of reading 5 students cannot answer the questions. 6 original students in answering the questions. 2 students answered two questions incorrectly. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 64.32 and the percentage is 52%. Listening aspect (listening comprehension) from 2 aspects, namely the aspect of listening attentively 7 students do not focus on listening to stories. 5 students lack focus on hearing stories. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 71.76 and the percentage is 48%.  The aspect of the ability to answer questions about the text listened to 5 students could not answer the questions. 6 original students in answering the questions. 2 students answered two questions incorrectly. In this aspect, the average score obtained is 65.52 and the percentage is 52%. The results of student interviews caused the initial reading difficulties of grade I students of SD 29 Sanggau were Physiological Factors with a percentage of 12%, Intellectual Factors with a percentage of 12%, Environmental Factors, with a percentage of 16%. Motivation Factor with a percentage of 24% and Confidence with a percentage of 4%.  

References

Abdurrahman, Mulyono. 1996. Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Depdikbud Dirjen Dikti.

Mayasari, Jiny. 2021. Analisis Kesiapan Membaca Permulaan Pada Siswa Kelas II Sd Negeri 10 Kota Pagar Alam Provinsi Sumatra Selatan. Skripsi.

Muammar. 2020. Membaca Permulaan di Sekolah Dasar. Cet.1 ; Sanabil.

Nana,Syaodih Sukmadinata. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rahim,Farida. 2018. Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Cet.5; Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

______. 2005. Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Rahmawati , Ulfi Pebri. 2017. Analisis Kesulitan Membaca Permulaan Siswa Kelas I pada Pembelajaran Tematik di SD Negeri 1 Notorejo Gondang Kabupaten Tulungagung. Skripsi.

Ramayanti, Sintia. 2019 .Kemampuan Literasi Awal Siswa Kelas Tiga Sd/Mi Di Kabupaten Sumedang Tahun Ajaran 2017-2018. Sumedang: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Skripsi.

Rathvon, Natalie. 2004. Early reading assessment: A practitioner’s handbook. New York: Guilford Press.

Richard, Olson & Byrne, Brian. 2005. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Reading and Language Ability and Disability (hlm. 173-200), dalam Catts, Hugh W. & Kamhi, Alan G. (Eds). 2005. The Connections Between Language and Reading Disabilities. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rizkiana. 2016. Analisis Kesulitan Membaca Permulaan Siswa kelas I SD Negeri BangunRejo 2 Kicak TegalRejo Yogyakarta. Skripsi.

Sahtiani, Jahrir & Andi. 2019. Membaca. Cv Penertbit Qinara Media

Santrock, John W. 2004. Psikologi Pendidikan, Edisi kedua. Alih Bahasa: Tri Wibowo BS. Jakarta: PRENADAMEDIA GROUP.

Subini, N dkk. 2012. Psikologi Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Mentari Pustaka.

Sugihartono,dkk. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan Yogyakarta: Mentari Pustaka.

Slamet, ST.Y. 2017. Dasar-dasar Pembelajatran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar. Sukarta: UNS Press.

Sugiyono.2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Cet. 22; Bandung: Alfabeta.

______. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharmi, Murti & Salamah Wahyuni. 2006. Metodologi penelitian bisnis. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.

Sujarweni,V. Wiratna. 2020. Metode Penelitian Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah Dipahami. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru.

Supriyadi. 1992. Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia 2. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Tarigan,Henry Guntur. 2021. Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: CV Angkasa.

Turkeltaub, Peter E. et. al. 2005. The Neurobiological Basis of Reading: A Special Case of Skill Acquisition (hlm. 103-129), dalam Catts, Hugh W. & Kamhi, Alan G. (Eds). 2005. The Connections

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Desember)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.