Cognitive Assessment Techniques on Student Learning Outcomes in SKI Subjects at MA Darul Ukhuwwah Putri 2 Singosari Malang

Authors

  • M. Sauqi Iza Masruri Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Meilia Kumala Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Khoula Azwary Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i2.6897

Keywords:

Cognitive assessment, Learning Outcomes, SKI

Abstract

Evaluation has a very significant role in the educational context, and effective and efficient evaluation is carried out continuously and comprehensively. Through the evaluation process, teachers can obtain an overview of the progress and achievements that have been achieved by students. One aspect of assessment in education, especially in Islamic cultural history subjects, is the cognitive domain. So, the purpose of conducting this research is to find out how the assessment techniques used by teachers affect student learning outcomes in SKI subjects at MA Darul Ukhuwwah Putri 2 Singosari Malang. The research method used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. The results of this research state that cognitive domain assessment is an activity carried out by teachers to measure students' understanding of learning. The cognitive domain assessment techniques used in SKI subjects at MA Darul Ukhuwwah are divided into 3 types, namely: written tests (multiple choice, short description and essay), group discussions, and oral tests. The written test can be carried out by giving several written questions to students via LKS/or a package book printed by MA Darul Ukhuwah Putri 2 Singosari Malang which contains questions and statements related to the material they have studied. The teacher carries out an oral test at the end of the lesson by conducting questions and answers between students and the teacher regarding the material they have studied, which is usually done during final exams.

Author Biography

  • M. Sauqi Iza Masruri, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
    mahasiswa pascasarjana UIN Malang

References

Aisa, S., & Muhammada. (2018). Implementasi media gambar dalam pembelajaran sejarah kebudayaan islam (SKI) di Mi. Roudlotul Mustarsyidin Keputran Bakalan Purwosari Pasuruan. Al-Murabbi: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 3(2), 149–164. https://jurnal.yudharta.ac.id/v2/index.php/mafhum/article/view/1340

Alam, H. S., & Prastowo, A. (2022). Implementasi Teknik Penilaian Kognitif Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JIE (Journal of Islamic Education), 7(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.52615/jie.v7i2.277

Antika, W., Sasomo, B., & Rahmawati, A. D. (2023). Analisis Asesmen Diagnostik Pada Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning di Kurikulum Merdeka SMPN 3 Sine. Pedagogy, 8(1), 250–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v8i1.2512

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Erniyanti, Junus, M., & Syam, M. (2020). Analisis Ranah Kognitif Soal Latihan Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi pada Buku Fisika Kelas X (Studi pada Buku Karya Ni Ketut Lasmi). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 1(02), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v1i02.337

Fachrudin, Y. (2023). Analisis Pembelajaran Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam. Dirasah: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 51–61. https://stai-binamadani.e-journal.id/jurdir/article/view/458

Muhibbin Syah. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mustika, D., Ambiyar, A., & Aziz, I. (2021). Proses Penilaian Hasil Belajar Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 6158–6167. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1819

Nana Sudjana. (2006). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurhasanah, & M. Yemmardhotillah. (2022). PEMBELAJARAN MATA PELAJARAN SEJARAH KEBUDAYAAN ISLAM (SKI) DI MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH NEGERI (MIN) BAWAN KECAMATAN AMPEK NAGARI KABUPATEN AGAM. El-Rusyd : Jurnal Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah STIT Ahlussunnah Bukittinggi, 5(1), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.58485/elrusyd.v5i1.51

Prastowo, A. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Rancangan Penelitian. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Putri, H., Susiani, D., Wandani, N. S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Kognitif pada Tes Uraian dan Tes Objektif. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v4i2.2649

Rahmayanti, I., & Wibowo, A. (2019). Kesesuaian Alat Evaluasi dengan Aspek Kognitif pada Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI SMA Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Revisi 2016 Terbitan Yrama Widya ( Analasis Isi ). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES.

Rosyidi, D. (2020). Teknik dan Instrumen Asesmen Ranah Kognitif. Tasyri` : Jurnal Tarbiyah-Syari`ah-Islamiyah, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.52166/tasyri.v27i1.79

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. CV. Alfabeta.

Tamrin, T., & Munawaroh, F. (2019). Teknik dan Instrumen Assessmen Ranah Kognitif Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran PAI. AL-LIQO: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.46963/alliqo.v4i1.20

Yanti, N., Duri, H., Duri, J. K., Stai, M. I., Duri, J. K., Siska, Z., Stai, W., & Karya Duri, J. (2022). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Ranah Kognitif pada Mata pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMK Negeri 1 Mandau. Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 19(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-05

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Juni)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.

How to Cite

Cognitive Assessment Techniques on Student Learning Outcomes in SKI Subjects at MA Darul Ukhuwwah Putri 2 Singosari Malang. (2024). JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 9(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i2.6897