Education Financing Planning Strategy in the Field of Middle School Education Development, Maybrat Regency Education Office

Authors

  • Bonifasius Air Universitas Negeri Manado
  • Shelty D. M. Sumual Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i2.7030

Keywords:

Education Financing, Planning Strategy, Transparency, Accountability, Maybrat Regency.

Abstract

This research aims to examine education financing planning strategies in the field of junior high school education development at the Maybrat District Education Office. This study was carried out using a bibliographic approach, which involved collecting secondary data from various relevant literature sources. The main findings of this research show that the main source of education financing in Maybrat Regency comes from the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) and School Operational Assistance Funds (BOS). However, this funding allocation is often insufficient to meet school operational and development needs. In addition, some schools are trying to find alternative funding sources through collaboration with private institutions and non-governmental organizations, although these initiatives are still limited. This research also found that transparency and accountability in the management of education funds need to be improved through financial management training and the implementation of an integrated financial information system. In addition, annual budget planning carried out by schools in Maybrat Regency needs to be performance-based and more flexible in dealing with changing needs. Other challenges include limited facilities and infrastructure, as well as limited accessibility due to remote geographical conditions. Recommendations from this research include diversifying funding sources through developing partnerships with the private sector and non-governmental organizations, strengthening financial management capacity through regular training, optimizing the use of funds through performance-based budgeting, and increasing community involvement in planning and monitoring education financing. It is hoped that the implementation of these strategies can improve the quality of education and create a more conducive learning environment for students in Maybrat Regency.

References

Ahmed, K. (2012). "Educational Finance: Planning, Programming, and Budgeting." New York: Routledge.

Bray, M. (2000). "Financing Education: A Systematic Approach." UNESCO Publishing.

Brown, P. (2017). "Performance-Based Budgeting in Education." Journal of Education Finance, 42(3), 287-305.

Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. World Bank Publications.

Clark, D. (2010). "Exploring Alternative Funding for Education." International Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 421-429.

Crouch, L., & DeStefano, J. (2017). Improving education outcomes in developing countries: Evidence, knowledge gaps, and policy implications. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 1-14.

Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.

Davis, J. (2018). "Audit Practices in Education Finance." Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 30(2), 209-231.

Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Westview Press.

Hanson, M. (2016). "Transparency and Accountability in School Finance." Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 610-643.

Johnson, R. (2019). "Adapting Financial Plans in Education." Journal of Education Policy, 34(1), 110-123.

Jones, L. (2013). "Financial Planning for Educational Institutions." London: Sage Publications.

Levin, H. (2001). "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Education." Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

OECD. (2018). Effective policies, successful schools: Supporting students to achieve through distributed leadership. OECD Publishing.

Ramli, A. (2020). "Community Involvement in Education Financing." Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 8(1), 35-50.

Robinson, J. (2007). How performance management is killing performance—and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 58-67.

Smith, B. (2014). "Annual Budget Planning for Schools." School Business Affairs, 80(1), 22-27.

Supriyadi, D. (2015). "Optimizing APBD and BOS Funds." Journal of Indonesian Education, 23(2), 179-192.

Thompson, E. (2017). "Integrated Financial Management Systems in Schools." Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 385-401.

Transparency International. (2013). Global corruption report: Education. Routledge.

White, S. (2013). "Monitoring and Evaluation in School Finance." Journal of Educational Finance, 38(4), 455-472.

Williams, J. (2015). "Training School Administrators in Financial

Management." Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 301-319.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-20

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Juni)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.