Comparison of Evaluation Approaches: Tests and Non-Tests on Students' Critical Thinking at SMPN 1 Wera

Authors

  • muhammad Ajwar STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
  • I Nengah Suastika STKIP Taman Siswa Bima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i2.7116

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of critical thinking skills in facing the challenges of the 21st century. The 2013 curriculum in Indonesia has emphasized the development of these competencies, but its implementation faces challenges in effective evaluation. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of test and non-test approaches in developing students' critical thinking skills at SMP N 1 Wera. The research results show that non-test approaches, such as projects and group discussions, have a significant positive impact on the development of students' critical thinking skills. Students feel more involved and motivated in learning when evaluated with a non-test approach. This approach gives them the opportunity to develop creativity, collaboration, and problem solving, which are important aspects of critical thinking skills. Although there are challenges in implementing non-test approaches, such as lack of time and resources, the benefits far outweigh the barriers. This research concludes that the non-test evaluation approach has great potential in improving student learning and developing critical thinking skills at SMP N 1 Wera.   

References

Alamrani, M., Alammar, K., Alqahtani, S., & Salem, O. (2017). Membandingkan Pengaruh Metode Pengajaran Berbasis Simulasi dan Tradisional terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Percaya Diri Mahasiswa Keperawatan. Jurnal Penelitian Keperawatan , 26, 152–157.

Bailin, S. (1987). Critical and Creative Thinking. Informal Logic, 9

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 10-16.

Butler, A. (2018). Tes Pilihan Ganda dalam Pendidikan: Apakah Praktik Terbaik Penilaian Juga Baik untuk Pembelajaran? Jurnal Penelitian Terapan dalam Memori dan Kognisi.

Carter, A., Creedy, D., & Sidebotham, M. (2018). Mengukur berpikir kritis pada mahasiswa kebidanan pra registrasi: Pendekatan multi metode. Pendidikan perawat saat ini , 61, 169-174.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Dewey, J. (2008). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Forgotten Books.

Dwyer, C., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43-50.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 2(3), 1-23.

Ferniawan, F., Sabaryati, J., & Utami, L. S. (2020). Efektifitas Penggunaan Media Poster 3 Dimensi Secara Daring Pada Materi Tata Surya Berbasis Google Classroom Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 1 Wera Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 6(2), 284 293.52.

Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2010). Authentic Assessment and Pedagogical Strategies in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Studies, 2(1), 1-12.

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Gunawan, I. (2017). Instructional Management in Indonesia: A Case Study. Researchers World, 8, 99-107.

Handayani, F., Maharani, R. A., & Fitria, Y. (2022). Penilaian dan Jenis Tes yang Dibuat Oleh Guru di Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 726-737.

Kusnadi, E., Abdulkarim, A., Komalasari, K., & , S. (2020). Strengthening Student’s Soft Skills in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0.

Latif, I., Saputro, D., & , R. (2018). How does the high school mathematics teacher prepares the learning process based on the 2013 curriculum 2017 revision. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983.

Martinovic, D., & Freiman, V. (2017). How Does Mathematics Education Evolve in the Digital Era. , 671-672.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2002). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Pearson Education.

Shahzadi, U., Hussain, S., & Jamil, M. (2021). Mengkaji Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Tingkat Menengah Atas. Review Pendidikan, Administrasi & HUKUM .

Thanassoulis, E., Dey, P., Petridis, K., Goniadis, I., & Georgiou, A. (2017). Mengevaluasi kinerja pengajaran pendidikan tinggi menggunakan proses hierarki analitik gabungan dan analisis data envelopment. Jurnal Masyarakat Riset Operasional , 68, 431-445.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for the 21st Century: Issues and Prospects. UNESCO Publishing.

Van, V., & My, N. (2020). Critical thinking - An essential skill for English pedagogical major students: Review and applications. SOCIAL SCIENCES.

Vysotska, O., & Vysotska, S. (2021). Memasukkan Berpikir Kritis dalam FLT., 55-59.

World Economic Forum. (2016). The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills, and Workforce Strategy for the Fourt

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Juni)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.