Common Teacher Mistakes in the Learning Outcome Evaluation Process: Implications for Evaluative Competency Development

Rindawan Rindawan, Mujriah Mujriah

Abstract


This study aims to analyze and identify the types of evaluation errors commonly made by primary and secondary school teachers in Southwest Praya Sub-district and explore the impact of these errors on student motivation and development. The study also aimed to develop strategic recommendations for developing teachers' evaluative competencies. The main problems identified include difficulties in selecting appropriate evaluation techniques, mismatching questions with students' abilities, and teachers' low understanding in developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-based questions. The study used a quantitative descriptive method with data collection through a questionnaire involving teachers as respondents. The results of the analysis showed that 75% of respondents experienced difficulties in choosing evaluation techniques, 80% considered the questions made were not in accordance with students' abilities, and 85% expressed a lack of understanding in developing HOTS-based questions. This finding confirms the need to increase teachers' capacity through structured training that focuses on preparing effective learning evaluations that meet students' needs. The contribution of this research is to provide practical recommendations for education policy makers to design more relevant professional development programs. The implications of the results of this study are expected to help improve the quality of learning evaluation at primary and secondary school levels, especially in the study area.

 

 


Keywords


Evaluation Errors, Impact of Evaluation Errors, Strategic Recommendations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amelia, U. (2023). Tantangan pembelajaran era society 5.0 dalam perspektif manajemen pendidikan. Al-Marsus: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 68-82.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2014). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.

Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the zone of proximal development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 23-48.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2021). Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment. Routledge.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2017). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.

Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2017). Principles of instructional design. Wadsworth Publishing.

Guskey, T. R. (2016). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.

Kinanthi, G. S., Saputri, N. F., & Rosita, N. A. Pentingnya Pengembangan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru dalam Menghadapi Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21. In Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series (Vol. 7, No. 3).

Lase, D. (2022). Keterampilan dan Kompetensi Guru Pendidikan Agama Kristen di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. SUNDERMANN: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi, Pendidikan, Sains, Humaniora dan Kebudayaan, 15(2), 53-66.

Lew, M. M., & Nelson, R. F. (2016). New Teachers' Challenges: How Culturally Responsive Teaching, Classroom Management, & Assessment Literacy Are Intertwined. Multicultural Education, 23, 7-13.

Marzano, R. J. (2015). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Educational assessment of students. Pearson Education.

Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International journal of adolescence and youth, 25(1), 104-112.

Popham, W. J. (2018). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Pearson.

Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education.

Silva, P., Lima, R., & Costa, M. (2022). Objectivity in Educational Evaluation: A Critical Perspective. Educational Measurement Quarterly, 39(2), 45–52.

Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Yazidah, N. I., Argarini, D. F., & Sulistyorini, Y. (2020). Pengembangan soal hots pada materi aljabar. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2)

Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Wang, H. (2021). Challenges in Educational Assessment for 21st Century Learning. Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 34–46.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i4.7888

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Rindawan Rindawan, Mujriah Mujriah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (p-issn: 2548-5555;e-issn: 2656-6745) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.

Alamat: Jl. Lingkar Selatan, Perum Elit kota Mataram Asri Blok O. No. 35, Jempong Baru, Sekarbela, Kota Mataram NTB. Indonesia