Common Teacher Mistakes in the Learning Outcome Evaluation Process: Implications for Evaluative Competency Development

Authors

  • Rindawan Rindawan Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika (UNDIKMA) Mataram
  • Mujriah Mujriah Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika (UNDIKMA) Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i4.7888

Keywords:

Evaluation Errors, Impact of Evaluation Errors, Strategic Recommendations.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and identify the types of evaluation errors commonly made by primary and secondary school teachers in Southwest Praya Sub-district and explore the impact of these errors on student motivation and development. The study also aimed to develop strategic recommendations for developing teachers' evaluative competencies. The main problems identified include difficulties in selecting appropriate evaluation techniques, mismatching questions with students' abilities, and teachers' low understanding in developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-based questions. The study used a quantitative descriptive method with data collection through a questionnaire involving teachers as respondents. The results of the analysis showed that 75% of respondents experienced difficulties in choosing evaluation techniques, 80% considered the questions made were not in accordance with students' abilities, and 85% expressed a lack of understanding in developing HOTS-based questions. This finding confirms the need to increase teachers' capacity through structured training that focuses on preparing effective learning evaluations that meet students' needs. The contribution of this research is to provide practical recommendations for education policy makers to design more relevant professional development programs. The implications of the results of this study are expected to help improve the quality of learning evaluation at primary and secondary school levels, especially in the study area.  

References

Amelia, U. (2023). Tantangan pembelajaran era society 5.0 dalam perspektif manajemen pendidikan. Al-Marsus: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 68-82.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2014). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.

Ash, D., & Levitt, K. (2003). Working within the zone of proximal development: Formative assessment as professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 23-48.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2021). Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment. Routledge.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2017). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.

Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2017). Principles of instructional design. Wadsworth Publishing.

Guskey, T. R. (2016). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.

Kinanthi, G. S., Saputri, N. F., & Rosita, N. A. Pentingnya Pengembangan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru dalam Menghadapi Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21. In Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series (Vol. 7, No. 3).

Lase, D. (2022). Keterampilan dan Kompetensi Guru Pendidikan Agama Kristen di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. SUNDERMANN: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi, Pendidikan, Sains, Humaniora dan Kebudayaan, 15(2), 53-66.

Lew, M. M., & Nelson, R. F. (2016). New Teachers' Challenges: How Culturally Responsive Teaching, Classroom Management, & Assessment Literacy Are Intertwined. Multicultural Education, 23, 7-13.

Marzano, R. J. (2015). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Educational assessment of students. Pearson Education.

Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International journal of adolescence and youth, 25(1), 104-112.

Popham, W. J. (2018). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Pearson.

Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education.

Silva, P., Lima, R., & Costa, M. (2022). Objectivity in Educational Evaluation: A Critical Perspective. Educational Measurement Quarterly, 39(2), 45–52.

Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Yazidah, N. I., Argarini, D. F., & Sulistyorini, Y. (2020). Pengembangan soal hots pada materi aljabar. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2)

Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Wang, H. (2021). Challenges in Educational Assessment for 21st Century Learning. Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 34–46.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16

Issue

Vol, 9 No 4 (2024) : JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Desember)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.