The Development of a Non-Cognitive Instrument to Measure Learning Motivation in Physics Among Students of The Radiology Engineering Program
Abstract
This study aims to develop a valid and reliable non-cognitive instrument to measure the learning motivation in Physics among students of the Radiology Engineering Program. Learning motivation is one of the psychological factors that influence students' academic achievement. In the context of Physics, which is often considered a difficult subject, learning motivation becomes a key element in overcoming challenges and enhancing understanding. Therefore, it is important to have an instrument that can accurately measure students' learning motivation, especially in relation to Physics material that is highly relevant to the Radiology Engineering field.The instrument developed in this study is based on learning motivation theory, which includes two main dimensions: intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation. Research Method The development process of the instrument was carried out through several stages. The first stage was the identification of motivation indicators relevant to these two dimensions. These indicators were then used to construct the instrument blueprint, which was later validated by experts to ensure the alignment of the items with the existing theory. The instrument was then empirically tested on a sample of students to assess its validity and reliability. Data analysis was performed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to assess construct validity, that is, whether the instrument accurately measures the dimensions of learning motivation. Additionally, the Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was used to measure the instrument's internal consistency, ensuring that the instrument provides consistent results. Research Findings The findings show that the developed instrument has good construct validity, with a total variance explained of 65%, indicating that the instrument can explain most of the variation in students' learning motivation in Physics. Furthermore, the instrument also demonstrates high reliability, with a Cronbach Alpha value of 0.89, indicating excellent internal consistency. Regression analysis shows that learning independence significantly affects concept understanding in Physics, with a value of F(2, 85) = 15.940, p < 0.001. This indicates that students with higher motivation, both intrinsic and extrinsic, tend to have a better understanding of Physics concepts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbar, M., & Anggraini, F. (2017). Teknologi dalam Pendidikan Literasi Digital dan Self Directed Learning pada MahasiswaSkripsi. Indigeneus, 2(1), 28-38.
Gilster, P. (2016). Digital Literacy. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence,7(3),1-12.
Mudjiman, H. (2007). Belajar Mandiri (Self - Motivated Learning). Surakarta: LPP UNS dan UNS Press.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Puspitasari, W. D., & Febrinita, F. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Pemahaman Konsep Kinematika Gerak ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. UPEJ Unnes PRais, H., & Ferinaldi. (2019). Pengaruh Minat Belajar terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis pada Mata Kuliah Teori Bilangan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika . Mat-Edukasia, 4(1), 71-77.
Simanjuntak, M. P. (2012). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Mahasiswa melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah Berbasis Video. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 55-60.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suhendri, H., & Mardalena, T. (2013). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Problem Solving terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar. Jurnal Formatif, 3(2), 105-114.
Pusdiklat Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Fisika di Sekolah. Jakarta: Pusdiklat.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suharyat, Y. (2009). Hubungan antara Sikap, Minat dan Perilaku Manusia. Jurnal Region, 1(3), 1-19.
Puspitasari, W. D., & Febrinita, F. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Pemahaman Konsep Kinematika Gerak ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. UPEJ Unnes PRais, H., & Ferinaldi. (2019). Pengaruh Minat Belajar terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis pada Mata Kuliah Teori Bilangan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika . Mat-Edukasia, 4(1), 71-77.
Suharyat, Y. (2009). Hubungan antara Sikap, Minat dan Perilaku Manusia. Jurnal Region, 1(3), 1-19.
Vivi, U., Ahmad, F., & Rosha, M. (2012). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Melalui Pendekatan PMR dalam Pokok Bahasan Prisma dan Limas. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 33-38.
Wiguna, D. G. E. S., Marhaeni, M. P. A. N., & Suastra, M. P. P. I. W. (2014). Kontribusi Gaya Kognitif dan Konsep Diri terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPA Mahasiswa Jurusan S1 PGSD Undiksha." Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Ganesha, 4(1), 1-10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v9i4.7943
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Samsun Samsun, Iva Sarifah, Gaguk Margono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (p-issn: 2548-5555;e-issn: 2656-6745) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.
Alamat: Jl. Lingkar Selatan, Perum Elit kota Mataram Asri Blok O. No. 35, Jempong Baru, Sekarbela, Kota Mataram NTB. Indonesia