A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ‘’BUZZ GROUP’’ AND ‘’CRITICAL DEBATE’’ TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT

Authors

  • K. Dedy Sandiarsa S Uiversitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram
  • Muhamad Suhaili

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v4i5.874

Keywords:

Buzz Group, Critical Debate and Speaking Achievement

Abstract

This research is aimed at finding the comparative study between Buzz Group and Critical Debate toward students’ speaking achievement. This research was experimental research. Statistic formula was used as the technique of data analysis. The subject of this research consisted of 44 students at the second grade students of MA Darul Qur’an Bengkel. The technique of collecting data used pre-test and post-test. The mean score of experimental group was 48.72 for pre-test, 66.18 for post-test and control group was 46.18 for pre-test, 63.27 for post-test. Variance of experimental group was 68.21, 62.91 for variance of control group and ttest score was 0.13 and t-table in significance level of 0.05 was 1.682 with degree of freedom was 42. It showed that t-test was higher than t-table, so that way, alternative hypothesis accepted and null hypothesis rejected. Therefore, the writer concluded there was significant compare of Buzz Group and Critical Debate towards students’ speaking achievement at the second grade students of MA Darul Qur’an Bengkel in academic year 2017/2018.

References

Barkley, Elizabeth F., Cross, K. Patricia, Major, Claire H. 2012. Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty 1st Edition. San Francisco, Calif. : Jossey-Bass,

Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for non- experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151-161.

Hughes, Arthur, 2002. Testing For Language Teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kothari, C.R. 2004. Research Methodology. New Delhi: New Age International Publisher.

Sujianto, Agus Eko. 2009. Aplikasi Statistik dengan SPSS 16.0. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 5 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.

How to Cite

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ‘’BUZZ GROUP’’ AND ‘’CRITICAL DEBATE’’ TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT. (2019). JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v4i5.874