Difference Results Study Mathematics And Activity Study Using Learning Models Cooperative Type Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Numbered Heads Together (NHT) on Material Operation Count Algebra

Authors

  • Mila Dwi Nanda Ashari Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Happy Lumbantobing Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Yosefin Rianta Hadiyanti Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Ronaldo Kho Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Rina Ananta Sitepu Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i2.8807

Keywords:

Learning outcomes, TGT and NHT learning models, N-gain

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the disparities in mathematics learning outcomes of students instructed through the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Numbered Heads Together (NHT) cooperative learning methods concerning algebraic arithmetic operations. The study was conducted at SMP Muhammadiyah Jayapura. This research employs an experimental design using counterbalancing. The study population comprised class VII of SMP Muhammadiyah Jayapura during the 2024/2025 academic year, with the research sample consisting of classes VII-B and VII-C, each containing 34 pupils. The sample selection employed a purposive sampling method. Data on learning outcomes were obtained through a validated assessment instrument. We analyzed the pretest and posttest scores to derive normalized learning outcome values (N-gain). Due to the non-normal distribution of the data, we evaluated the N-gain value using non-parametric statistics via the Wilcoxon test. The study's results showed a significant difference in learning outcomes between the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Numbered Heads Together (NHT) cooperative learning models, with a sig. ρ value of 0.401, which is higher than 0.05. The mean N-gain value in Teams Games Tournament (TGT) (0.93) surpassed the mean N-gain value of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) (0.92). The study's results indicated that student engagement in learning through the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) method surpassed that of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) model. The disparity in activity was substantial according to the Wilcoxon test, with a significance level of sig. ρ = 0.705.

References

Abdullah, K., Jannah, M., Aiman, U., Hasda, S., Fadila, Z., Taqwin., M., Adiawan, N, K., Sari, E, M. 2022. Quantitative Research Methodology . edited by N. Saputra. Aceh: Muhammad Zaini Publishing Foundation.

Arib, MF, Rahayu S, M., Sidorj, AR, and Afgani W, M. 2024. “Experimental Research in Educational Research.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 4(1):5497–5511.

Arrasyid, H., Wapa, A., and Pratiw, D, M, D. 2022. “The Effect of Jigsaw Type Cooperative Learning Model on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Grade IV of Elementary School Cluster V Tegaldlimo.” Consilium: Education and Counseling Journal 2(1). doi: 10.36841/consilium.v2i1.1612.

Dani, U, A., Hilwa, N. 2020. “Comparison of Students’ Concept Understanding Through POE Learning and Modified Free Inquiry Learning.” Journal of Physics Education 8(2):1–9.

Bernadus, J, Y, E., Pengamen, S, A., Pesik, A. 2022. “The Effect of Numbered Heads Together Type Cooperative Learning Model on Civics Learning Outcomes.” Journal of Mathematics Research, Education and Collaboration 3(1):4548.doi:10.24042/terampel.v6i2.4812.

Kamarullah. 2017. "Mathematics Education in Our Schools." Al Khawarizmi: Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning1(1).doi:10.22373/jppm.v1i1.1729.

Lepith, C, G., Molle, S, J., and Tamalene, H. 2024. “Improving Student Learning Outcomes with the Numbered Head Together (NHT) Type Cooperative Learning Model on Algebra Material for Grade VII Junior High School.” Unpatti Mathematics Education Journal 5(3):136–41.

Mislinawati, S, F, F, I., 2017. “Teacher Obstacles in Implementing Learning Models in Thematic Learning Based on the 2013 Curriculum at SD Negeri 2 Banda Aceh City.” Scientific Journal of Elementary School Teacher Education, FKIP Unsyiah 2(1):88–97.

Mufida, S. 2024. “The Role of Teachers in the Formation of Student Character.” ( JMA) 2(6):3031–5220.

Sopian, A. 2016. “The Duties, Roles, and Functions of Teachers in Education.” Raudhah Proud To Be Professionals: Jurnal Tarbiyah Islamiyah 1(1). doi: 10.48094/raudhah.v1i1.10.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-25

Issue

Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Juni)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.

How to Cite

Difference Results Study Mathematics And Activity Study Using Learning Models Cooperative Type Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Numbered Heads Together (NHT) on Material Operation Count Algebra. (2025). JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 10(2), 729-732. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i2.8807