The Impact of AI Chat-GPT Dependence on High School Teenagers in Bandung City

Authors

  • Aip Syaepul Uyun Universitas Ma,soem
  • Jaenal Muttakin Universitas Ma,soem

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i2.8841

Keywords:

ChatGPT, high school students, dependency

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, especially ChatGPT, has had a major impact on the world of education, including among high school students. This study aims to identify the level of ChatGPT usage and the perceptions of high school teenagers in Bandung City regarding the positive and negative impacts of its use. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and documentation from 100 respondents selected using stratified random sampling. The results showed that 91% of students use ChatGPT for academic purposes, but only 35% understand how to use it wisely. As many as 77% of respondents are aware of the potential risk of dependency, but many still use it without critical consideration. These findings indicate that although AI can increase productivity and efficiency in learning, ignorance in its use has the potential to interfere with the development of critical and analytical thinking skills, social and collaborative development, and the low accuracy of information generated by Chat-GPT. Therefore, digital literacy and an educational approach are needed that prioritize the use of AI ethically and responsibly in the era of Society 5.0.

References

Ceylan, V. K., Topal, M., & Atıcı, B. (2023). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ academic performance and critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00422-9

Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Christie, S. (2017). Structure mapping for social learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 758–775.

Christie, S., & Gentner, D. (2010). Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 356–373.

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton & Company.

Financial Times. (2025). Generative AI models are skilled in the art of bullshit. https://www.ft.com/content/55c08fc8-2f0b-4233-b1c6-c1e19d99990f

Fitria, T. N., & Aslam, R. (2023). ChatGPT and its effects on students' learning behavior and academic integrity. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(4), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i4.4421

Floridi, L., et al. (2021). The ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. Springer.

Gasser, U. (2020). Kecerdasan buatan dan anak muda: Posisi kami saat ini. Youth and Media.

Gunkel, D. J., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2024). ChatGPT: Deconstructing the debate and moving it forward. AI and Society.

Harish, A., et al. (2023). Integrating AI into modern education: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Modern Education, 12(3), 102–114.

Hou, I., Man, O., Hamilton, K., Muthusekaran, S., Johnykutty, J., Zadeh, L., & MacNeil, S. (2025). "All roads lead to ChatGPT": How generative AI is eroding social interactions and student learning communities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09779.

Kabir, S., Udo-Imeh, D. N., Kou, B., & Zhang, T. (2023). Is Stack Overflow obsolete? An empirical study of the characteristics of ChatGPT answers to Stack Overflow questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02312. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02312

Kharis, S. A. A., & Indriyani, A. (2023). Analyzing social and psychological impacts: Shifting student interaction from teachers to ChatGPT in the learning process. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4779

Kim, H. K., Nayak, S., Roknaldin, A., Zhang, X., Twyman, M., & Lu, S. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on student interactions in computer-supported collaborative learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07082.

Li, C., & Xing, W. (2021). Natural language generation using deep learning to support MOOC learners. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(2), 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00235-x

Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.

Miranda, D., et al. (2019). ChatGPT for enhanced academic productivity. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 120–130.

Muarif. (2023). Hubungan perkembangan teknologi AI terhadap pembelajaran mahasiswa. Seroja: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 117–127.

Netragaonkar, S. (2024). Penerapan kecerdasan buatan dalam pendidikan untuk menghadapi tantangan era digital. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 8(1), 56–64.

Powers, T., & Rothman. (n.d.). Ethical implications of AI: A critical analysis. Journal of Ethics in Technology, 15(3), 201–215.

Prensky, M. (2019). What the world needs from education. https://marcprensky.com

Puyt, R. W., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2024). Evaluating ChatGPT-4’s historical accuracy: A case study on the origins of SWOT analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1402047.

https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1402047

Rizki, N. J. (2022). Penerapan teori perkembangan sosial dan kepribadian Erikson dalam pendidikan: Pendekatan psikososial untuk optimalisasi pembelajaran. Epistemic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.70287/epistemic.v3i3.69

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (Edisi ke-4). Prentice Hall.

Shen, X., Chen, Z., Backes, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). In ChatGPT we trust? Measuring and characterizing the reliability of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08979. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08979

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (ed. ke-2). Bandung: Alfabeta

Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09292. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09292

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

Wei, Q., Yao, Z., Cui, Y., Wei, B., Jin, Z., & Xu, X. (2023). Evaluation of ChatGPT-generated medical responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08410. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08410

Yadav, A., Gupta, P., & Kumar, R. (2024). Peran kecerdasan buatan dalam meningkatkan pembelajaran yang dipersonalisasi di bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 15(2), 112–120.

Yuan, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Artificial intelligence and student critical thinking: A double-edged sword. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12345–12360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11520-0

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-25

Issue

Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Juni)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.

How to Cite

The Impact of AI Chat-GPT Dependence on High School Teenagers in Bandung City. (2025). JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 10(2), 842-851. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i2.8841