Email this article The Impact of AI Chat-GPT Dependence on High School Teenagers in Bandung City
Abstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, especially ChatGPT, has had a major impact on the world of education, including among high school students. This study aims to identify the level of ChatGPT usage and the perceptions of high school teenagers in Bandung City regarding the positive and negative impacts of its use. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and documentation from 100 respondents selected using stratified random sampling. The results showed that 91% of students use ChatGPT for academic purposes, but only 35% understand how to use it wisely. As many as 77% of respondents are aware of the potential risk of dependency, but many still use it without critical consideration. These findings indicate that although AI can increase productivity and efficiency in learning, ignorance in its use has the potential to interfere with the development of critical and analytical thinking skills, social and collaborative development, and the low accuracy of information generated by Chat-GPT. Therefore, digital literacy and an educational approach are needed that prioritize the use of AI ethically and responsibly in the era of Society 5.0.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ceylan, V. K., Topal, M., & Atıcı, B. (2023). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ academic performance and critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00422-9
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Christie, S. (2017). Structure mapping for social learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 758–775.
Christie, S., & Gentner, D. (2010). Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 356–373.
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton & Company.
Financial Times. (2025). Generative AI models are skilled in the art of bullshit. https://www.ft.com/content/55c08fc8-2f0b-4233-b1c6-c1e19d99990f
Fitria, T. N., & Aslam, R. (2023). ChatGPT and its effects on students' learning behavior and academic integrity. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(4), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i4.4421
Floridi, L., et al. (2021). The ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. Springer.
Gasser, U. (2020). Kecerdasan buatan dan anak muda: Posisi kami saat ini. Youth and Media.
Gunkel, D. J., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2024). ChatGPT: Deconstructing the debate and moving it forward. AI and Society.
Harish, A., et al. (2023). Integrating AI into modern education: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Modern Education, 12(3), 102–114.
Hou, I., Man, O., Hamilton, K., Muthusekaran, S., Johnykutty, J., Zadeh, L., & MacNeil, S. (2025). "All roads lead to ChatGPT": How generative AI is eroding social interactions and student learning communities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09779.
Kabir, S., Udo-Imeh, D. N., Kou, B., & Zhang, T. (2023). Is Stack Overflow obsolete? An empirical study of the characteristics of ChatGPT answers to Stack Overflow questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02312. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02312
Kharis, S. A. A., & Indriyani, A. (2023). Analyzing social and psychological impacts: Shifting student interaction from teachers to ChatGPT in the learning process. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4779
Kim, H. K., Nayak, S., Roknaldin, A., Zhang, X., Twyman, M., & Lu, S. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on student interactions in computer-supported collaborative learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07082.
Li, C., & Xing, W. (2021). Natural language generation using deep learning to support MOOC learners. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(2), 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00235-x
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
Miranda, D., et al. (2019). ChatGPT for enhanced academic productivity. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 120–130.
Muarif. (2023). Hubungan perkembangan teknologi AI terhadap pembelajaran mahasiswa. Seroja: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 117–127.
Netragaonkar, S. (2024). Penerapan kecerdasan buatan dalam pendidikan untuk menghadapi tantangan era digital. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 8(1), 56–64.
Powers, T., & Rothman. (n.d.). Ethical implications of AI: A critical analysis. Journal of Ethics in Technology, 15(3), 201–215.
Prensky, M. (2019). What the world needs from education. https://marcprensky.com
Puyt, R. W., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2024). Evaluating ChatGPT-4’s historical accuracy: A case study on the origins of SWOT analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1402047.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1402047
Rizki, N. J. (2022). Penerapan teori perkembangan sosial dan kepribadian Erikson dalam pendidikan: Pendekatan psikososial untuk optimalisasi pembelajaran. Epistemic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.70287/epistemic.v3i3.69
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (Edisi ke-4). Prentice Hall.
Shen, X., Chen, Z., Backes, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). In ChatGPT we trust? Measuring and characterizing the reliability of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08979. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08979
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (ed. ke-2). Bandung: Alfabeta
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09292. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09292
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
Wei, Q., Yao, Z., Cui, Y., Wei, B., Jin, Z., & Xu, X. (2023). Evaluation of ChatGPT-generated medical responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08410. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08410
Yadav, A., Gupta, P., & Kumar, R. (2024). Peran kecerdasan buatan dalam meningkatkan pembelajaran yang dipersonalisasi di bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 15(2), 112–120.
Yuan, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Artificial intelligence and student critical thinking: A double-edged sword. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12345–12360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11520-0
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i2.8841
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Aip Syaepul Uyun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (p-issn: 2548-5555;e-issn: 2656-6745) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.
Alamat: Jl. Lingkar Selatan, Perum Elit kota Mataram Asri Blok O. No. 35, Jempong Baru, Sekarbela, Kota Mataram NTB. Indonesia