Analysis of the Utilization of AI ChatGPT in Assisting the Learning Process of Informatics Education Students at Citra Bangsa University

Authors

  • Felsita Natalia Hendrik Universitas Citra Bangsa
  • Maria Magdalena Beatrice Sogen Universitas Citra Bangsa
  • Wulan Marsela Baidenggan Universitas Citra Bangsa
  • Faldi Do'o Universitas Citra Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i2.8860

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Learning, Informatics, Students

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, specifically ChatGPT, in assisting the learning process of students in the Informatics Education study program. The research focuses on the following issues: the level of ChatGPT utilization by students during their learning activities; the benefits experienced from using ChatGPT as a tool to understand material, debug code, and complete assignments; and students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of ChatGPT in enhancing their understanding of Informatics coursework.The method used in this study refers to a quantitative approach with a survey method, employing data collection through the distribution of structured questionnaire instruments to research participants, namely active students of the Informatics Education Study Program. Out of 30 respondents, 96.7% use ChatGPT, primarily to understand material, complete assignments, and engage in independent learning. Students identified various functional benefits from using ChatGPT, such as increased study time efficiency, ease in obtaining conceptual clarifications, and the ability to access explanations that are more structured and easier to understand compared to conventional sourcesFurthermore, most students gave positive evaluations of ChatGPT as a digital entity capable of increasing learning motivation, improving material comprehension, saving time, and supporting practical tasks. These findings confirm ChatGPT’s potential as an effective learning support tool. However, its integration needs to be conducted wisely to avoid cognitive dependency and maintain academic integrity.Based on the overall findings presented, this study recommends that the use of ChatGPT in higher education contexts be done proportionally, prudently, and accompanied by a critical attitude. Students are encouraged not to passively accept every piece of information provided by the AI system but rather to use it as an intellectual stimulus to explore further knowledge, develop deeper understanding, and uphold academic integrity in every learning process.  

Author Biographies

  • Felsita Natalia Hendrik, Universitas Citra Bangsa
    Mahasiswa
  • Maria Magdalena Beatrice Sogen, Universitas Citra Bangsa
    Dosen
  • Wulan Marsela Baidenggan, Universitas Citra Bangsa
    Mahasiswa
  • Faldi Do'o, Universitas Citra Bangsa
    Mahasiswa

References

Handoyo, Emanuel Ristian, et al. "Identifikasi Pengaruh Penggunaan ChatGPT terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Mahasiswa di Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta Prodi Sistem Informasi Angkatan 2021." KONSTELASI: Konvergensi Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi 3.2 (2023): 342-352.

Pertiwi, Anna, Yulius Panter Bara, and Yohari Pakiding. "Mengoptimalkan Pengalaman Belajar menggunakan AI dalam Dunia Pendidikan pada Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan." Prosiding Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja 3.3 (2023): 1-12.

Kharis, Selly Anastassia Amellia, and Arman Haqqi Anna Zili. "Chatgpt Sebagai Alat Pendukung Pembelajaran: Tantangan dan Peluang Pembelajaran Abad 21." Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan 15.2 (2024): 206-214.

Alifka, Muh. Analisis dan Implementasi Algoritma Convolutional Neural Network pada Opinion Mining dalam Pemanfaatan Platform Chatbot di Twitter= Analysis and Implementation of Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm on Opinion Mining in the Utilization of Chatbot Platform on Twitter. Diss. Universitas Hasanuddin, 2024.

Hadian, Tantan, M. Pkim, and Eneng Rahmi. Berteman dengan ChatGPT: Sebuah Transformasi dalam Pendidikan. Edu Publisher, 2023.

Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165

Handoyo, E. R., Wibowo, A., & Prasetyo, T. (2023). Pemanfaatan ChatGPT dalam proses pembelajaran mahasiswa informatika. Jurnal Teknologi dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 45–52.

Ramadhan, R., Suryani, T., & Putra, D. M. (2023). Analisis pemanfaatan ChatGPT dalam dunia pendidikan: Peluang dan tantangan. Jurnal Riset Teknologi dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 4(2), 88–97.

Susanto, H., & Wijaya, A. F. (2023). Etika penggunaan AI dalam pendidikan tinggi: Studi kasus ChatGPT. Jurnal Etika dan Teknologi, 2(3), 33–40.

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-14

Issue

Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Juni)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.