Efl Students’ Perception Towards Self-Efficacy In Teaching Internship Program With Technology Integration

Authors

  • Nur Irma Yanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Sampit
  • Intan Nor’aini Husaini Universitas Muhammadiyah Sampit
  • Nikmah Sistia Eka Putri Universitas Muhammadiyah Sampit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i3.9414

Keywords:

Teaching Internship, Self-efficacy, Technology Integration, EFL Students

Abstract

This research was conducted based on the research problem related to the self-efficacy of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students during their teaching internships with technology integration. This research focuses on students perceive their ability to teach English using digital tools and the factors that contribute to the development of their self-efficacy. The aim of research is to explore EFL students' perceptions of self-efficacy and identify key contributing factors.This research used a qualitative approach with a case study design. The participants were six EFL students from Universitas Muhammadiyah Sampit who had completed their Teaching Internship III. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. To ensure the validity of the findings, triangulation was applied by comparing the data.The findings indicate that 67% of participants demonstrated high self-efficacy, reinforced by successful teaching experiences and positive responses from students. Meanwhile, 33% of participants exhibited medium self-efficacy in the classroom or nervousness while teaching. The questionnaire data support these findings. Among the four factors, the most dominant is mastery experience (x̅ = 12.00), followed by verbal persuasion (x̅ = 11.67), vicarious experience (x̅ = 11.33), and the least dominant is emotional and physiological states (x̅ = 11.00). 

References

Amankwah, F., Oti-Agyen, P., & Sam, F. K. (2017). Perception of pre-service teachers’ towards the teaching practice programme in college of technology education, University of Education, Winneba. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4), 13–20.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy. In Cristine Hastings (Ed.), W.H. Freeman and Company (First). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885512472964

Barni, D., Danioni, F., & Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of personal values and motivations for teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (L. Habib (ed.); Third, Vol. 01). Sage Publication.

Ertmer, P. A., Tondeur, J., & Ottenbreith-Leftwich, A. (2014). Teacher beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st century teaching and learning. In Internation Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs (1st ed.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294736258_Teacher_Beliefs_and_Uses_of_Technology_to_Support_21st_Century_Teaching_and_Learning

Fadhilah Suralaga. (2021). Psikologi pendidikan implikasi dalam pembelajaran (2021st ed.). Rajawali Pers.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596

Ghufron, M. N., & S, R. R. (2017). Teori-teori psikologi (R. Kusumaningrati (ed.); 2nd ed.). Ar-Ruzz Media.

Hesbol, K. (2019). Principal Self-Efficacy and Learning Organizations: Influencing School Improvement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 14(1), 33–51.

Hoang, T. (2018). Teacher Self-efficacy Research in English as Foreign Language Contexts: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(4), 976–990.

Lap, T. Q., Lien, N. T. H., & Thao, L. T. (2022). EFL Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Classroom Management: Perceptions, Practices and Reflections on Professional Learning and Development. European Journal of English Language Studies, volume-2-2(volume-2-issue-1-june-2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejels.2.1.1

Lee, Y.-J., & Davis, R. (2023). Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy through Hybrid Field Practicum in a Korean Teacher Education Program. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16421a

Manasikana, I., & Hartono. (2021). Teaching Internship Program for the Development of Student Teachers Pedagogical Competence: Students Voices. Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.30659/jamr.2.2.53-61

Maryam, I. S., Febriani, R. B., & Kurnia, A. D. (2019). EFL Learners’ Perception towards Their Self-Efficacy in Learning Public Speaking. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 3(3), 377–391.

Mpele Lekhanya, L., & Lucky Dlamini, H. (2017). Customer’s perception towards product quality of automotive SMEs operating in Metropolitan areas, and consideration of environmental impact. Environmental Economics, 8(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(1).2017.04

Nurazizah, S., Amalia, I., & Septiana, T. I. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using Digital Posters Presentation to Enhance Students ’ Speaking Skill. Wanastra : Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(1), 15–21.

Nurfajriani, W. V., Ilhami, M. W., Mahendra, A., & Sirodj, R. A. (2024). Triangulasi Data dalam Analisis Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(17), 826–833.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). In Sage Publications (3rd ed., Vol. 3, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X0300300213

Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2015). Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x

Qiong, O. U. (2017). A Brief Introduction to Perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.3968/10055

Rachmawati, D. (2017). Self-concept of EFL Pre-service Teachers: A Reflection from a Teacher Practicum in Indonesia Context. Journal of English Language Studies, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v2i1.1589

Rahmawati, R. D., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., & Fredy, F. (2022). Determinants of Self Efficacy in Mathematical Communication Elementary School Students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3693–3704. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1827

Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. English Australia Journal, 32(1), 113–116.

Runtukahu, A., Saerang, D., Pandowo, Mhc., G Runtukahu, A. L., E Saerang, D. P., & Ch Pandowo, M. H. (2024). The Impact Of Self-Efficacy And Self Esteem On Internship Students Job Performance Pengaruh Efikasi Diri Dan Harga Diri Terhadap Kinerja Kerja Mahasiswa Magang. 12(03), 1092–1103.

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Septiana, I. G. Y., Wibawa, I. M. C., & Trisna, G. A. P. S. (2022). International Education of Elementary. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 182–194.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. ALFABETA.

Sulistiani, I. R., & Dewi, M. S. (2024). Teachers’ Performance in Integrating Technologu in The Digital Era Through Professional Competence and Self-Efficacy. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru MAdrasah Ibtidayaiyah, 14(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.18952/aladzkapgmi.v14i1.11016

Suwanti, V., Suastika, I. K., Ferdiani, R. D., & Harianto, W. (2022). Analisis Dampak Implementasi Program MBKM Kampus Mengajar pada Persepsi Mahasiswa. JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 6(3), 814. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v6i3.8773

Syapira, S. A., Budiman, & Selamat, M. N. (2022). Self-Efficacy And Self-Regulation With Academic Procrastination in Muslim Adolescents During the Online Learning Period. Psikologi Islami, 8(1), 88–101. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/psikis/article/view/11894

Sydhagen, P. B. (2017). How Can We Distinguish Perception from Cognition? The Perceptual Adaptation Hypothesis (p. 108).

Ulla, M. B., & Winitkun, D. (2018). In-service teacher training program in Thailand: Teachers’ beliefs, needs, and challenges. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(3), 1579–1594.

Warini, N. L., Dewi, N. P. E. S., Susanto, P. C., & Dewi, P. C. (2020). Daya Tarik Tiktok Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Online. Sinesa Prosiding, November, 27–34.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-09-18

Issue

Vol 10, No 3 (2025): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (September)

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics

This scientific code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the publication process of scientific journals, namely managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. The statement of the ethical code of scientific publications is based on the Head Regulation of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication, which in essence is the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication which essentially upholds the three ethical values in publication, namely

  1. Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications;
  2. Justice, namely to give authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors / writers; and
  3. Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Editor-in-Chief’s Duties and Responsibilities of the

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scope of science, scale, and accreditation if necessary.
  2. Determine editor membership.
  3. Defining relationships between publishers, editors, best partners, and other parties.
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and best-partner partners.
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  6. Conduct a journal policy review and submit it to authors, editors, best partners, and readers.
  7. Make a code of conduct guide for editors and best partners.
  8. Publish journals regularly.
  9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing.
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing.
  11. To improve the quality of the journal.
  12. Prepare licensing and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. The editor comments on the author's writing so the reader can understand what the writer wants to say, through comments written on the script.
  2. The editor comments on the author's writing in accordance with the EYD language (Enhanced Spelling) or the language according to the standard of the journal.
  3. The editor strives to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  4. The editor puts forward freedom of opinion objectively,
  5. The editor conveys corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies if needed,
  6. The editor ensures that the writer's writings are not related to SARA or anything that could harm the Publisher and coordinate the writer's writings to the editor in chief of the publisher if the writing is slightly controversial.
  7. Editor receives, examines, and follows up complaints from all parties involved in publishing the journal;
  8. The editor supports initiatives to educate researchers about the ethics of publication,
  9. Editors do not maintain their own opinions, authors or third parties that can result in non-objective decisions,
  10. The editor encourages the author, so that he can make repairs to the paper until it is worth publishing.
  11. The editor performs the layout of the manuscript to be published so that it matches the journal template.
  12. Editor membantu pemimpin redaksi dalam menyelesaikan pengumpulan naskah sebelum dicetak dan diterbitkan, terutama dalam hal bahasa, format, dan tata letak.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Peninjau

  1. Memberikan umpan balik tertulis yang objektif dan tidak bias tentang nilai beasiswa dan kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan;
  2. Menunjukkan apakah penulisan naskah cukup jelas, lengkap, dan relevan, serta apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal;
  3. Tidak memberikan kritik atau komentar yang bersifat pribadi; dan
  4. Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah, dengan tidak membicarakannya dengan pihak-pihak yang tidak terkait, atau mengungkapkan informasi yang terkandung dalam naskah kepada pihak lain.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Administrator Situs Web

Administrator Situs Web adalah orang yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengelola situs web jurnal. Secara spesifik, ruang lingkup tugas Administrator Situs Web adalah sebagai berikut:

  1. Menyiapkan situs web jurnal;
  2. Konfigurasikan opsi sistem dan kelola akun pengguna;
  3. Daftar untuk editor, pengulas, dan penulis;
  4. Kelola fitur jurnal;
  5. Melihat statistik laporan; dan
  6. Unggah/terbitkan makalah yang sudah diterima.

    Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta
    Penulis yang menerbitkan karya ilmiahnya di Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:

    1. Penulis memegang hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)  yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya tersebut dengan pengakuan atas kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini. 
    2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontraktual tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif atas versi karya yang diterbitkan jurnal tersebut (misalnya, mengunggahnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan atas penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
    3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mengunggah karya mereka secara daring (misalnya, di repositori institusi atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena hal ini dapat mengarah pada pertukaran yang produktif serta kutipan yang lebih awal dan lebih banyak dari karya yang diterbitkan.

How to Cite

Efl Students’ Perception Towards Self-Efficacy In Teaching Internship Program With Technology Integration. (2025). JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 10(3), 1183-1191. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i3.9414