Data Literacy Intervention in Scientific Speaking Learning: Perspectives of Teachers and Students in High School
Abstract
Data literacy interventions in learning are an important part of improving student competency. Data literacy is a form of new literacy development that is considered adaptive and mandatory for students to support the competencies they want to achieve, especially in scientific speaking. This study aims to investigate data literacy interventions in scientific speaking learning from the perspectives of teachers and students at the high school level. Data literacy skills are considered to have a positive impact on how students speak argumentatively. This study used descriptive qualitative methods and data collection techniques through interviews and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques through data collection, data presentation, data condensation, and conclusion drawing. The research findings indicate that teachers' perspectives on data literacy interventions have a good and positive impact on students' tendency to argue through scientific speaking activities, and learning activities with data literacy interventions stimulate students to be able to access, collect, sort, and analyze various data into information that can be communicated through scientific speaking skills. Student perspectives on data literacy interventions indicate that data literacy has a positive impact on supporting scientific speaking skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alvermann, D. E., & Rush, L. S. (2004). Literacy intervention programs at the middle and high school levels. Adolescent Literacy Research and Practice, 210–227. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=48103b531504d2b629a4361fdba18739125a7829
Arciosa, R. M., Perfecio, J., & Cerado, E. C. (2022). Community extension: Literacy and numeracy enhancement program for alternative learning system and out-of-school youth learners. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 1(2), 75–80. https://ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/view/103
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007083
Beck, J. S., & Nunnaley, D. (2021). A continuum of data literacy for teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69(March), 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100871
Bhargava, R., & D’Ignazio, C. (2015). Designing tools and activities for data literacy learners. Workshop on Data Literacy, Webscience.
Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253
Brooks, G., & Wilson, J. (2014). Using oral presentations to improve students ’ English language skills Using Oral Presentations to Improve Students ’ English Language Skills. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 19(1), 199–212.
Bu, D., Chung, P. K., Zhang, C. Q., Liu, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Mental health literacy intervention on help-seeking in athletes: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197263
Cowie, B., & Cooper, B. (2017). Exploring the challenge of developing student teacher data literacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1225668
De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of an innovative instructional intervention on the acquisition of oral presentation skills in higher education. Computers and Education, 53(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.005
Deahl, E. S. (2014). Better the data you know: Developing youth data literacy in schools and informal learning environments. In SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2445621
Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers and Education, 51(1), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001
Eriyanti, R. W. (2018). Pengmbangan Bahan Ajar Keterampilan Berbicara Interaktif Bagi Mahasiswa. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v3i1.4381
Erwin, R. W. (2015). Data Literacy: Real-World Learning Through Problem-Solving With Data Set. American Secondary Education, 43(2), 18–26.
Gebre, E. (2022). Conceptions and perspectives of data literacy in secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1080-1095. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13246
Gebre, E. H. (2018). Young adults’ understanding and use of data: insights for fostering secondary school students’ data literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(4), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0034-z
Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15536–15545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117
Hafifah, G. N., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2020). Teachers’ ICT literacy and ICT integration in ELT in the Indonesian higher education setting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762050
Jacobs, J., Gregory, A., Hoppey, D., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). Data literacy: understanding teachers’ data use in a context of accountability and response to intervention. Action in Teacher Education, 31(3), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2009.10463527
Kansa, E., & Kansa, S. W. (2021). Digital data and data literacy in archaeology now and in the new decade. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 9(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2020.55
Khakima, L. N., Zahra, S. F. A., Marlina, L., & Abdullah, Z. (2021). Penerapan literasi numerasi dalam pembelajaran siswa MI/SD. Prosiding Seminar Nasional PGMI, 1(1), 775–791.
Kim, J. S., Burkhauser, M. A., Mesite, L. M., Asher, C. A., Relyea, J. E., Fitzgerald, J., & Elmore, J. (2021). Improving reading comprehension, science domain knowledge, and reading engagement through a first-grade content literacy intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000465
Kippers, W. B., Poortman, C. L., Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Data literacy: What do educators learn and struggle with during a data use intervention? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56(September 2017), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.001
Kjelvik, M. K., & Schultheis, E. H. (2019). Getting messy with authentic data: Exploring the potential of using data from scientific research to support student data literacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-02-0023
Koltay, T. (2015). Data literacy: In search of a name and identity. Journal of Documentation, 71(2), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2014-0026
Kusumawati, H. (2018). Retorika pemakaian bahasa para demonstran di kabupaten Pamekasan. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v4i2.7076
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648717
Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A Systemic View of Implementing Data Literacy in Educator Preparation. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12459803
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage.
Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. McGraw-Hill.
Mills, K. A. (2010). A Review of the “‘digital turn’” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364401
Nafila, A., & Al Fatah, S. A. A. (2022). Peranan self efficacy dalam mengatasi kecemasan berbicara di depan umum. Muttaqien; Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Islamic Studies, 3(2), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.52593/mtq.03.2.05
Oktavia, Y., & Hulu, F. (2017). Pengaruh metode quantum learning berbasis media interaktif terhadap prestasi belajar Bahasa Indonesia mahasiswa di Universitas Putera Batam. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v3i2.5133
Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2020). The social utility of ‘data literacy.’ Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1707223
Prado, J. C., & Marzal, M. Á. (2013). Incorporating data literacy into information literacy programs: core competencies and contents. Libri, 63(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0010
Raffaghelli, J. E., & & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’to support future practices in faculty development: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1696301
Reeves, T. D., & Honig, S. L. (2015). A classroom data literacy intervention for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.007
Ridsdale, C., Rothwell, J., Ali-Hassan, H., Bliemel, M., Irvine, D., Kelley, D., Matwin, S., Smit, M., & Wuetherick, B. (2016). Data Literacy: A Multidisciplinary Synthesis of the Literature. Nineteenth SAP Academic Conference Americas: Building the Talent of the Future for the Digital Enterprise, February, 11–14.
Robin, J., Harrison, J. E., Kaufman, L. D., Rudzicz, F., Simpson, W., & Yancheva, M. (2020). Evaluation of Speech-Based Digital Biomarkers: Review and Recommendations. Digital Biomarkers, 4(3), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1159/000510820
Sang, Y. (2017). Expanded territories of “literacy”: new literacies and multiliteracies. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 16–19.
Steviani, D. S. (2020). Presentasi interaktif dalam pembelajaran daring. Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian & Pengabdian, 1(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31933/ejpp.v1i1.211
Sukartaatmadja, I., & Muktiadji, N. (2020). PKM Kegiatan Outbound & Team Building Bagi Karyawan BPR Mandiri. Jurnal Abdimas Dedikasi Kesatuan, 1(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.37641/jadkes.v1i1.337
Susilawati, E., Syaf, A. H., & Susilawati, W. (2017). Pendekatan eksplorasi berbasis intuisi pada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Jurnal Analisa, 3(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v3i2.2015
Ting, Y. L. (2015). Tapping into students’ digital literacy and designing negotiated learning to promote learner autonomy. Internet and Higher Education, 26, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.004
Van Audenhove, L., Van den Broeck, W., & Mariën, I. (2020). Data literacy and education: Introduction and the challenges for our field. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-3-1
Watson, F. L., & Lom, B. (2008). More than a picture: helping undergraduates learn to communicate through scientific images. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-07-0045
Wijaya, E. M. (2018). Penerapan Metode Bermain Peran dalam Bentuk Dialog untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berbicara Bahasa Mandarin Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 2 Malang. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.vol3.no1.41-48
Wolff, A., Gooch, D., Cavero, J. J., Rashid, U., & Kortuem, G. (2016). Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3275
Yildiz, D. H. (2021). Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers’ TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1136–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619591
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i4.9871
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Haris Faisal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (p-issn: 2548-5555;e-issn: 2656-6745) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.
Alamat: Jl. Lingkar Selatan, Perum Elit kota Mataram Asri Blok O. No. 35, Jempong Baru, Sekarbela, Kota Mataram NTB. Indonesia