The Role Of The Head Of The Institution's Leadership In Improving The Quality Of Education At LKPMr. Einstein

Authors

  • gita noviaty Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v1i2.9844

Keywords:

kepemimpinan pendidikan, ketua lembaga, mutu pendidikan, lembaga kursus, pendidikan nonformal

Abstract

This study aims to describe the leadership roles of the head of the institution in improving the quality of education at LKP Mr Einstein. The research focuses on  four  dimensions  of  educational  leadership,  namely  the roles  of  educator, administrator,   supervisor,   and   leader,   as   well   as   the   strategic   efforts undertaken  by  the  institutional  head  to  strengthen  teacher  professionalism, learning facilities, and student achievement. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, direct observations,  and  document  analysis.  Data  were  analyzed  using  Miles  and Huberman’s interactive model, which consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, supported by data validity checks through source and methodological triangulation.The findings indicate that the institutional head performs the leadership roles in an integrated and consistent manner. As an educator,  the  institutional  head  guides  and  facilitates  teachers’ professional development through training and mentoring activities. As an administrator, the institutional head designs program plans, manages resources, and ensures the  availability  of  a  conducive  learning  environment.  As  a  supervisor,  the institutional   head   monitors   the   teaching   process,   provides   constructive feedback,  and  addresses  instructional  challenges  faced  by  teachers.  As  a leader, the institutional head formulates educational visions, fosters a positive organizational  culture,  and  motivates  teachers  and  staff  through  effective collaboration   and   communication.   Furthermore,   the   institutional   head implements  strategic  efforts  such  as  enhancing  teacher  professionalism, improving  learning  facilities,  and  organizing  student  development  programs including  public  speaking,  confidence  shows,  and  outing  class  activitiesIn conclusion, the effectiveness of the institutional head’s leadership significantly contributes  to  the  improvement  of  educational  quality  at  LKP  Mr  Einstein, particularly in the areas ofinstructional processes, teacher performance, and student outcomes. These findings reinforce the importance of transformational and instructional leadership within the context of non-formal education
Abstract Views 200PDF Downloads 43

References

Akparep, J. Y., Jengre, E., & Mogre, A. A. (2019). The influence of leadership style on organizational performance at TumaKavi Development Association, Tamale, Northern Region of Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(5), 45–56.

Albaros, M. (2012). Kepemimpinan pendidikan: Mengembangkan karakter, budaya, dan prestasi sekolah di tengah lingkungan yang terus berubah. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers’ performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19–29.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bush, T. (2020). Leadership and school management: Theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

Kristiawan, M. (2020). Kepemimpinan pendidikan dan peningkatan mutu layanan lembaga pendidikan nonformal. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 45–56.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mulyasana, H. E. (2015). Pendidikan bermutu dan berdaya saing. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rahayu, D. (2022). The role of leadership in improving instructional quality in non-formal education institutions. Jurnal Pendidikan Nonformal, 17(2), 78–89.

Sagala, S. (2015). Manajemen dan kepemimpinan pendidikan pondok pesantren. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 22(2), 205–225.

Spillane, J. P. (2012). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

UNESCO. (2021). Education quality framework: Principles for effective learning environments. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Wahyudi, A. (2021). Leadership practice in training institutions: Its impact on teacher performance. Journal of Educational Practice, 5(3), 112–120.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-02

How to Cite

The Role Of The Head Of The Institution’s Leadership In Improving The Quality Of Education At LKPMr. Einstein. (2026). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 12(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v1i2.9844

Similar Articles

81-90 of 584

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.